The March 1999 and June 2003 CAP reforms: Main provisions (original) (raw)
Related papers
IMPORTANCE OF CAP REFORMS FOR THE DUTCH AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN 2000-2020
2008
Since 2000, the two important reforms of The EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) took place. The Agenda 2000 Berlin Agreement of March 1999 aimed to increase EU agriculture market orientation and focuses on the grain, oilseed, dairy and the beef sectors. It reduced intervention prices in these sectors and lowered the set-aside requirements for crops and by implementation of non-crop specific compensatory payments. The core of The Luxembourg Agreement from June 2003 was an acceleration of decoupling of farm support initiated by the Agenda 2000 complementary payment. It introduces a system of direct payments (known as single payment scheme - SPS), which are no longer linked to the production (decoupling). This CAP reform also includes commodity specific measures, especially in dairy sector. The Luxemburg Agreement links the direct payments to farmers with farm management practices which maintain environmental and other requirements set at EU and national levels (‘Cross-compliance’). T...
From One Common Agricultural Policy Reform to the Next. Price cuts and cost control (IP927a)
The prices of the main agricultural products continue to fall in constant Euros, because of technical progress and the increasing internationalisation of certain markets. In 2001, for many farm products the production priceis lower than the cost. In this situation of falling prices, the Common Agricultural Policy, reformed in 1993 and again in 2000, guarantees the net margin for some products while at the same time adjusting the volume of production. Other products do not benefit from any aid payments and thus show net margins which fluctuate much more widely. Résumé : Les prix des principaux produits agricoles ne cessent de baisser en euros constants, du fait de l’internationalisation croissante de certains marchés et du progrès technique. En 2001, pour de nombreux produits agricoles, le prix à la production est inférieur au coût. Face à la baisse des prix, la politique agricole commune, réformée en 1993 puis en 2000, garantit pour certains produits la marge nette tout en ajustant ...
Forum for Social Economics, 2023
The purpose of this article is to study the development of EU agricultural policies from a historical reconstruction perspective. The 1957 Treaty of Rome, the basis of today’s European Union, gave birth to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) in order to coordinate production across different European countries, to ensure food self-sufficiency and the certainty of supply to member states. Over time, several choices, as well as certain subsidies and policies (e.g. milk quotas) have been called into question as part of the liberalisation of the common agricultural market. Others persist, but continue to favour the unequal management of funds in favour of large companies specialised in intensive agriculture and livestock farming. These choices represent a loss in terms of both biodiversity and traditional farming knowledge and know-how. The decisive changes of the CAP at the institutional level have transformed the socio-economic as well as geographical landscape of Europe. It should be added that with the current crises—the COVID-19 pandemic, the war in Ukraine, and the ecological crises—the entire model is being called into question. Consequently, this article, after providing a brief overview, aims to reconstruct the common agricultural policies. It then provides an explanatory framework in quantitative terms of the French and Italian agricultural sectors to highlight what are, in the authors’ opinion, the limits of the CAP, even in the face of the crises mentioned above.
THE IMPACT OF CAP REFORM ON ROMANIAN AGRICULTURE
2008
The paper attempts to evaluate, on the basis of two scenarios (moderate and radical), the effects of CAP reforming compared to the situation of current CAP scenario and its effects upon welfare. Direct payments for the large farms, some of them operating on thousands of hectares, cannot contribute to the objective of supporting farmers’ incomes. The solution for the modernization
Consequences of 2003 cap reform for dutch agriculture
Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2005
This paper examines the medium term consequences of the Luxembourg CAP reform agreement in June 2003 for Dutch agriculture. Under this agreement, the EC has proposed to reduce the amount of support to EU agriculture that is coupled to agricultural production and to replace it through decoupled payments. The Netherlands has chosen for fully decoupled direct payments for crops, sucker cows, bulls and ewe premiums, while it holds the slaughter premiums for calves and adult cattle coupled. As the effect of this policy measures will largely depend on the extent that the decoupled support will influence the behavior of the farmers regarding their real production decisions, we have experimented with different ‘behavioral repercussion’ levels for decoupled payments. By evaluating the effects of these experiments on farmer’s income levels, we could determine a kind of “optimal” farmers’ behavior as the result of decupling of payments. The CAP impact is measured against the baseline scenario,...
The mid-term CAP reform (June 2003) and French cereal farms in the intermediate regions
2004
Using a regional model optimizing farmers' agricultural income subject to a set of constraints, while also simulating the evolution of farming structures in the period 2002-2012, the impacts of the Luxembourg compromise on farm incomes and agricultural structures, the cropping pattern and agricultural decline (idle land) are here analysed with regard to cereal production in intermediate regions. Simulations show little risk of agriculture decline: a loss of 8% farms if cereal prices drop considerably, to 81€ by 2012. A recoupling of 25% of the aids makes this decline disappear in this price scenario, which supposes a drop in the intervention price. Following the Luxembourg compromise, the maintenance of the intervention price should impede such a fall in prices and so naturally slow down the decline. While the final "Fischler" proposals (scenario 1) would have entailed major drops in farm incomes per hectare and farm, the Luxembourg compromise (scenario 2) should allow...
The Impact of the CAP on Agriculture and Rural Areas of EU Member States
Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 2015
The article presents the main aspects of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) while also exploring the contextual parameters and impact on agriculture and rural areas of the European Union (EU) member states. CAP is one of the most important policies of the EU, having for decades occupied the major share of the region’s budget and had profound effects on farm structures, agricultural employment and rural areas, as well as wider economic, social, political, environmental and cultural implications, for old and new member states. The article is organized in five sections. The introductory section offers a brief account of the basic dimensions of the newly reformed CAP, which suggest how the CAP is destined to evolve in the near future. The next section is dedicated to the analysis of farm structures, agricultural and regional employment, agricultural incomes and regional development. The third section deals with the evolution of the CAP objectives, as well as the drivers connected to the recent CAP reforms. Next, there is a comprehensive presentation of the CAP impact on agriculture and rural areas of the member states. Finally, a number of conclusions are drawn regarding the path dependency of the CAP and its continued inefficiency on lowering social and spatial inequalities in rural areas.
Cap Reform Policy Alternatives and Farm Decisions'Optimization-The Case of Slovenia
2007
The 2003 reform of Common agricultural policy to be implemented in Slovenia in 2007 could have significant impact on the economic position of some agricultural sectors in Slovenia. Out of economics sight one can expect a drastic impact especially in sectors like beef, where percentage of pre-reform production coupled direct payments was very high-up to 70 % of gross margin achieved. This leads farmers to seek new production plans. For this purpose detailed specified static linear programming model has been developed and applied to the hypothetical agricultural holdings in order to find optimal production plans by maximizing total gross margins. Model results confirm that the reform should have unfavourable impacts on farms with intensive production practice, especially those with high livestock density. Obtained results indicate that the negative impacts can be mitigated by combining different production activities and technologies under given constraints on resources available. Model results also confirm the growing importance of CAP rural development payments, among them particularly inclusion into agri-environmental measures.