Comparing two business modelling approaches in the language action perspective (original) (raw)
Related papers
Using a language action framework to extend organisational process modelling
2003
contact tel: 0117 344 3165 fax: 0117 344 3155 keywords: language action, conversations for action, role activity diagramming, organizational process modelling stream: developing the IS discipline topic: theoretical underpinning of information systems alternate stream: co-ordination topic: systems development Full paper. 3700 words. Fig 1 is a Visio diagram. Figs 2,3,4 are Powerpoint diagrams.
Encyclopedia of Information Communication Technology
The effective use of information and communication technology, or ICT (Barua, Kriebel, & Mukhopadhyay, 1995; Burn & Szeto, 2000; Mahmood & Mann, 2005; Mukhopadhyay, Kekre, & Kalathur, 1995; Sircar, Turnbow, & Bordoloi, 2000; Zammuto, 1982), requires a careful design of information systems and the business processes they support from a communicative perspective (language-action perspective). The literature on language action provides a broad spectrum of frameworks for modeling business processes, for example, business action theory (BAT; Goldkuhl, 1996, 1998; Goldkuhl & Lind, 2004), dynamic essential modeling of organizations (DEMO; Dietz, 1999; Dietz & Habing, 2004; Liu, Sun, Barjis, & Dietz, 2003; van Reijswoud, 1996; van Reijswoud & Dietz, 1999), action workflow (Denning & Medina-Mora, 1995; Kethers & Schoop, 2000; Medina-Mora, Winograd, Flores, & Flores, 1992), action-based modeling (Lehtinen & Lyytinen, 1986), and conversation for action (Winograd & Flores, 1986). Among these fr...
Supporting Interactions Between Organizations with Language-Action Models
2006
A trading partner agreement can be used to regulate the cooperation of organizations. It is typically written in natural language which gives rise to misunderstandings when partners interpret it differently. In addition it is often compiled in an unsystematic way so that we might easily overlook a situation the contract should have covered. It is therefore desirable to have a method that can support the design of such an agreement in a controlled and structured fashion. We suggest an approach to this problem that is based on the Language-Action Perspective on organizations.
The Communicative Action Paradigm for Business Modelling - A Research Agenda
1998
The communicative action paradigm for research and practice in business process and information systems modelling and design has showed to be promising. The paper presents a proposed research agenda for performing research on business modelling and related issues according to the communicative action papradigm. Sixteen research issues are described and justified. These research questions can be grouped into three areas: 1) conceptual issues, 2) modelling and design issues and 3) meta level issues. The formulated research agenda is one result from a collaboration between two research groups (VITS from Sweden and DEMO from the Netherlands).
Towards a Language for Business Action Theory
2006
Abstract Business Action Theory is an established framework for modeling business processes from an action perspective. We develop the outline of a language that is consistent with this theory and show how it can be applied to analyse the commitments that are made in the course of a business process.
Business Action and Information Modeling - The Task of the New Millennium
Information Modeling in the New Millennium
In this chapter, we discuss the importance of considering the action character of information when modeling information in business processes. The Language Action Perspective (LAP) is described and proposed as the perspective of choice for information modeling – now and for the future. It is emphasized that two of the most important research areas in the new millennium are to further develop LAP and to operationalize it into systems development methods. Furthermore, the generic business framework of Business Action Theory (BAT) and the requirements engineering method VIBA/SIMM (Versatile Information and Business Analysis according to the Situation adaptable work and Information Modelling Method), as representatives of LAP, are both described and positioned within LAP. This positioning is achieved by elaborating different LAP approaches and their relationships to BAT and VIBA/SIMM.
Executives are experts in managing their business systems, much in the same way Formula One drivers are experts in driving their cars. However knowing the behaviour of cars doesn't tell one how they are constructed and could be improved with new technology. The same holds true for Reengineering Business Systems through Information Technology. If management wishes to redefine the organisation, technical skills and knowledge of reengineering information systems are required to realise these objectives. Therefore Reengineering the Organisation will have to integrate a technical and a strategic management approach. In this article the Theory of DEMO is presented as a fundamental new perspective for Reengineering Organisations through IT.
Nowadays, there are many languages for business modeling, such as UML, BPMN and EPBE, which are well suited to describe, in a generic way, business views that stakeholders consider relevant. However, these languages don't take advantage of the concepts, business-specific, identified during the Information Architecture design. In business usermodels, those concepts are usually only present as element names, and thus the modeling tool does not support the semantics associated with those business concepts.