Organizational, Not transactional, Legal Engineers (original) (raw)

The Impact of Law Tech on the Future of Lawyers

Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks, 2021

The future belongs to rapidly evolving technologies. The most fascinating and capable of revolutionising legal industry is likely to be with the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI). It will be the main driver of changes in the legal profession. In the digital world of the future, human lawyers will need to demonstrate emotional intelligence and a deep understanding of how technology can help them to provide better services. These qualities and skills will undoubtedly be just as valuable as formal legal knowledge. The lawyers of tomorrow should focus on cooperating with AI, making sure it is developed and used legally, so as to augment their services rather than fearing being replaced by it. The future partner of law firms may be the leader of a multidisciplinary team of professionals in which AI is substantially used. Legal teams consisting of people and AI could be a dynamic and very effective structure where humans have an important role to play thanks to their unique features and abilities: intellective judgment, empathy, creativity and adaptability.

Legal Professionals of the Future.docx

New Suits, 2019

The paper examines the nature of professionalism and knowledge that underlie the legal profession and others. I argue that despite the huge effects and consequences of automation, lawyers will always have a role as counselor and trusted adviser. This is embedded in the nature of professionalism, which means lawyers' tasks and roles can't be simply decomposed into sets of tasks as put forward by Susskind.

Legal Technology: Assessment of the Legal Tech Industry's Potential

Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2022

The use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in the sector of legal services has resulted in the emergence of a new category of services known as legal technology (legal tech). This article aims at defining the current state of research concerning the matter, confirming its interdisciplinary nature and examining the level of its popularity. The strategy assumed for the article has influenced the order and sequence of the topics covered starting from an introduction to legal technology together with analysis of the context of the definition of the term (legal tech) ("Introduction" section), through a detailed discussion of the methodology of systematic literature review, its results and an appraisal of the popularity of the notions ("Materials and Methods" and "Bibliometric Analysis" sections), the application of the thematic analysis method ("Thematic Analysis of the Reference Repository" section), Google Trends analysis ("Analysis of the Popularity of the Terms 'Legal Technology' or 'Legal Tech' (Google Trends)" section), and finally the conclusions ("Conclusions" section). The research methodology covers a systematic literature review, quantitative bibliometric analysis, the thematic analysis method, and-complementarilypopularity analysis performed using the Google Trends analytical tool. The article confirms the multidisciplinary nature of legal technology as a subject matter, indicating the thematic categories corresponding with the notion under investigation. It contains a description of the geographical segmentation and difference in that regard at a global level. The author has verified the presence of publications on legal technology and shown that the future of the legal services sector lies in an interdisciplinary juxtaposition of the classic legal sciences with entirely new areas, i.e. IT, artificial intelligence, and data analysis.

Digitalization of the Legal Field and the Future of Large Law Firms

Laws

This paper discusses how large law firms should re-organize themselves to maintain a competitive edge in the increasingly digitalized legal field. While providing a brief historical introduction to the rise of large law firms and the challenges posed by the rise of digital capitalism and the gig economy, the paper proposes an original and radical approach to reforming large law firms in the light of the digitalization. Among other things, the paper discusses (I) the partnership as organizational tool for large law firms in an increasingly digital and agile legal field; (II) the importance of multidisciplinary practices and of the relationship between lawyers and non-lawyers within firms; and (III) the centrality of outsourcing strategies to legal tech companies and other actors in order to deliver legal services more effectively and in a more client-oriented manner.

Disruptive Innovation: New Models of Legal Practice

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000

For decades, lawyers have been complaining that they hate working at law firms, and clients have expressed increasing frustration with high legal fees. But complaining is as far as either group went, until recently. This is perhaps the first attempt at a comprehensive review of a wide variety of new business organizations that have arisen in recent years to remedy the market's failure to deliver business organizations responsive to the complaints of either lawyers or of clients. The "New Models of Legal Practice" described here typically offer a new value proposition for lawyers and clients. For lawyers, New Models offer better work-life balance and more control over other aspects of their work lives-in exchange for which lawyers typically shoulder more risk, giving up a guaranteed salary, to be paid instead only for the hours they work. For clients, New Models typically drive down legal fees by sharply diminishing overhead through elimination of expensive real estate and the high cost of training new lawyers, and (again) dispensing with guaranteed salaries.

The Future of the Legal Profession

Monash University Law Review, 2011

The legal profession, if not the world, is in crisis. According to the Chinese, the written character for 'crisis' also denotes danger and opportunity, simultaneously. 1 If crisis brings opportunity, then the profession is at a turning point. 2 It is estimated that 80 per cent of Americans cannot afford a lawyer, resulting in unequal access to justice. 3 At the same time, the number of lawyers has almost tripled in the United States since 1970, 4 contributing to increased economic 1