EASTERN EUROPE: NOT ONE, BUT SEVERAL TRANSITIONS: Dumitru Sandu: Spațiul social al tranziției [The Social Space of Transition], Iasi: Polirom, 1999, 232 pages (original) (raw)
https://doi.org/10.1163/18763308-90000029
Uploaded (2022) | Journal: East Central Europe
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Abstract
AI
The paper reviews Dumitru Sandu's work on the complexities of transitions in Eastern Europe post-communism. It emphasizes that rather than a single transition narrative, multiple, often conflicting transitions exist within the region, influenced by ideological and institutional factors. Sandu's analysis underscores the varying successes and failures of reform efforts across different countries, with a focus on the everyday experiences of individuals navigating these changes.
Related papers
Central and Eastern Europe in Transition
Contemporary Economic Policy, 1992
zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum politicarum (dr. rer. pol.) im Fach Volkswirtschaftslehre eingereicht an der Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät
The Transition in Eastern Europe, Volume 2: Restructuring
When communism fell in 1989, the question for most Eastern European countries was not whether to go to a market economy, but how to get there. Several years later, the difficult process of privatization and restructuring continues to concern the countries of the region. The Transition in Eastern Europe, Volumes 1 and 2 is an analysis of the experiences of various countries making the transition to market economies and examines the most important challenges still in store. Volume 1, Country Studies, gives an in-depth, country-by-country analysis of various reform experiences, including historical backgrounds and discussions of policies and results to date. The countries analyzed are Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, eastern Germany, Slovenia, and Russia. Written by leading economists, some of whom helped shape local and national reforms, this volume identifies common progress, common difficulties, and tentative solutions to the problems of economic transition. Volume 2, Restructuring,...
Advances in Spatial Science, 1999
Eight years after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the Iron Curtain economic and political cleavages are still visible in Europe. With respect to social and economic transition the saliency of the problems seem to increase, as the efforts to solve the problems become the common business of governments and international organizations. Regional economic and political integration have significant impacts on this process, namely through the European Union programs for restructuring and development. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the main problems in the process of transition and reintegration has to so overcome from a theoretical and conceptual point of view. The theoretical anchors political and economic theories of regional integration. After a period with declining attention, regional integration has again become topic in various parts of the world. Concepts of integration are still pivotal in Europe, partly regarding the internal development of the European Union, partly as a framework of cooperation between the EU and the rest of Europe. Based on the analysis of the concepts of Regional Economic Cooperation in Europe, the links between international economic integration and internal development are analyzed. The relationship between macroeconomic integration and the necessary of providing instruments to cover specific areas or sector from significant adverse effects of this process is given special attention in the analysis. This part of the analysis will focus on the needs for restructuring of existing EU-policies to meet the challenges of the next enlargements. The theoretical concepts will be used for a principal evaluation of the needs for a future regional policy for an enlarged community. The process of transition and recovery in East Europe has been challenged not only by the regained influence of traditional political groups in East Europe but also through the reluctance of the EU to open their markets in sectors where the former CMEA-countries are competitive. To avoid further drawbacks it seems necessary to establish a self sustainable economic system able to handle external (i.e. the process of enlargement) as well as internal (i.e. the structural funds) demands for restructuring. The first precondition is the opening of western markets. The second is to provide a reliable regime for development and knowledge transfer. Last but not least, the paper stress' the need to establish a reasonable framework for cooperation until the East and Central Europe can participate on equal terms in the mainstream of European Integration, and to handle the different waves of membership negotiations in a reliable way.
Eastern Europe: The International Context
Journal of Democracy, 2000
The democratic revolutions of 1989 in Central and Eastern Europe have been described as the culmination of the "third wave" of global democratization that began in Spain and Portugal in the mid-1970s. It is indeed tempting to see the disintegration of the Soviet empire as part of a worldwide crumbling of dictatorships. This view certainly influenced how the democratic transition in East-Central Europe has been perceived in the West (as the "end of history") as well as by some of its protagonists. Ten years later, however, despite extensive Western efforts at democracy promotion, the democratic tide has somewhat retreated, leaving a picture of successes in Central Europe (as well as in Latin America and parts of Asia) offset by setbacks in the former Soviet Union and the Balkans (but also in China and most of Africa). In no other region of the world has the impact of international factors on democratization been as apparent as in Central and Eastern Europe. The revolutions of 1989 were characterized by two important features: First, they were made possible by the lifting of the Soviet imperial constraint. The Soviet bloc imploded, rapidly and peacefully. The falling dominoes of Soviet hegemony in East-Central Europe seemed to complete the triumph of the periphery over the center of the empire. To be sure, the roots of the ideological, political, and economic decay of Jacques Rupnik, senior fellow and professor at the Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques in Paris, is author of The Other Europe: The Rise and Fall of Communism in East-Central Europe (1989) and Le Déchirement des nations (1995) and editor of International Perspectives on the Balkans (forthcoming).
20 Years After the Collapse of Communism. Expectations, achievements and disillusions of 1989
2011
Obviously, the Europeanization process has not yet brought the expected “common house of Europe” with all the freedoms and values linked to the symbol of 1989. It is true that Europe has been able to give important support to the transformation processes in Central and Eastern Europe. But it is equally true that the underlying ideas of Europe have not found their way to almost all countries of the former Soviet Union. In this regard Russia stands for an ideologically and power oriented regime, contrasting its authoritarian “model” to the Europeanization process and particularly to all the “coloured” democratic experiments in its neighbourhood. The eastwards movement of experiments with democracy, as it could be observed in the “colour revolutions” in Ukraine and Georgia, is challenged by a westwards movement of the quasiauthoritarian Russian model. The recent repressions in Belarus followed by the rigged elections in December 2010 obviously stand for the westwards move of the Russian model. And it remains to be seen to what extent the achievements of the “colour revolutions” can be at least partially maintained in Ukraine and in Georgia. Freedom is not an uncontested value in the post-Soviet space. But it has been claimed at its periphery where a lot of hybrid and transitional situations can still be observed. Typically countries characterised by transitional or hybrid regimes are oscillating somewhere in a grey zone between the democratic and the authoritarian poles. They may have halted, delayed or impeded their transformation process. In order to prevent the risk of an authoritarian backlash, an European democracy promotion strategy would make sense in those countries that show unclear prospects for democracy. This would be in line with what 1989 was about: overcoming the division of Europe and avoiding new division lines between East and West. It is precisely the challenges of ambiguous transitions that the contributions to the volume try to address from their various regional and disciplinary perspectives. The book is organized into three larger parts, respectively, (1) covering ambiguities of unfinished transformations, (2) attempting to make sense of the past and its implications for the present, and (3) deliberating over values and meanings in changing contexts. They do not assemble the countries regionally, but rather attempt to organize various narratives around problems, as there seem to be three large areas of difficulties experienced along the different paths of transformation.
The Transition Economies: Eastern Europe and Central Asia
2004
After the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, a neoliberal counterrevolution occurred within most of the former Central and Eastern Europe including the former Soviet Union. The countries in this region rejected all hybrid forms of market socialism on the grounds that this so-called ‘third way‘ had proved to be unworkable. Kornai (1986) played a major role in that radical shift of Eastern European elite on the efficiency and reformability of socialist systems.
Eastern Europe in transition, the case of Hungary
Acta Juridica Hungarica, 2012
The result of circumspect and considerate preliminary work, by 1990, the system of public administration characteristic of bourgeois, democratic and constitutional states was established in Hungary. The transformation of public administration is still far from complete, since fundamental reforms encompassing both structural and functional measures, and also the unifi ed regulation of public sector human resources, urgently need to be effectuated. The continuous and rapid transformation exhausted public administration after a period and the reform programs with low effi ciency discredited the ideas promoting the necessity of reforms themselves. Public administration weary of the reforms itself became gradually not supportive of, but passively resistant to the cause of the reforms, which merely reinforced the philosophy of NPM based on a neoliberal conception of the state implying that public administration cannot be reformed from within. In certain cases Hungary was under an excessive illusion concerning both NPM and EAS, it was more responsive to them than the other countries concerned. Today, however, as a party both to the European Union and EAS, Hungary with its specifi c experiences can contribute to the development of European public administration. Currently running complex program of the development of public administration alludes to a more considerate and subtle approach, which related to the consideration of international experiences sets forth that "any solution originating abroad or in the market may be applied exclusively with proper criticism and the examination of its effects.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Related papers
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, 2002
The relatively bloodless economic and political collapse of the former Soviet bloc has been surprising in many respects. The political disaster of the communist empire was deep and spread rapidly to a large number of countries; but it came rather unexpectedly. Post-communist leaders made frequent public statements about their commitment to free-market principles, but transition towards the free-market model kept encountering impediments. Recommendations and suggestions for policymaking have been offered in great quantity by scholars as well as by development experts at think tanks and international agencies, but their policies have produced disappointing results. More generally, despite the huge literature which has been flourishing since the early 1990s, the origins and unfolding of transition remain unclear, and most of the proposed solutions to the economic problems related to "transition" continue to be debated. Part of the problem may be due to the fact that the collapse of the communist empire was not a traditional political crisis. The incumbent rulers were not voted out of power, as in a democracy. But it is also hard to claim that some kind of popular revolt against the communist leaders occurred. In fact, most of those very leaders are still in key positions today, often with substantial and diffused support. This is important, for it reveals some neglected and yet critical features of most Eastern-European transition countries in these years. In particular, these countries have not generated a new cohort of political leaders legitimized by their competence and technical expertise. Strong commitment to freemarket economic principles has not been enough to gather consensus, and may even be counterproductive. And the reluctance to get rid of the old élite demonstrates that personal ties and informal institutional structures have remained of the greatest political importance. In many situations a deep involvement with past planning and political practices is still an asset, both for politicians and for managers, rather than a cause for shame and disgrace. These points are of particular relevance for the law-and-economics interpretation of transition in Eastern Europe, which attributes particular importance to the origins of the crisis. The system of property-rights in a market-economy is the critical issue for understanding the nature of institutional change and the chances for successful transition towards a free-market model. More precisely, the appropriate assessment of the consensus-or lack of it-about the system of property-rights to be employed and about the process through which the new property-rights structure should be defined and monitored, and about the role of government in the process will determine the kind of transition an economy will experience. This is clearly in contrast with the standard view, which takes for granted that the pattern of property rights emblematic of a planned economy have been rejected by the vast majority of the
Central and Eastern Europe in transition: an unfinished process?
European View, Dec. 2014, pg.1-10, DOI: 10.1007/s12290-014-0329-z, Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Since 1989 the former socialist countries of Central and Eastern Europe have been undergoing a transition from a more or less totalitarian political regime, planned economy and socialism towards a democratic regime, market economy and capitalism. This article examines the indicators that are used to measure the success or failure of a transition and compares them to the outcomes of democratic processes and economic performance. Five Central and Eastern European countries are studied: Slovenia, Hungary, Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Poland. The article concludes that the countries that opted for a ‘big-bang’ approach to transition are either completing this process (the Czech Republic and Poland) or are well on track to concluding it (Slovakia), while the countries that missed the moment and opted for a gradualist approach (Hungary and Slovenia) lag behind and may even find stability in a form of deficient democracy.
After Twenty Years – Reasons and Consequences of the Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe
The Majority of the papers in the present volume are the result of a series of seminars which took place between autumn 2007 and spring 2009 at the Department of the History of Eastern Europe at Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, headed by Dr. Tamás Krausz, under the auspices of the doctoral programme entitled ‘The History of Eastern Europe first in a wider historical context and then concentrating on the processes of the past twenty years. "The project helps young researchers to join in with the international debate on their subject matter and to foster the emergence of a common discourse. We believe it is important that the young generation of historians born around or after the transition who did not live through the pre-1989 period as children or young contemporaries should come to play an increasing role in this discourse. A certain distance in time is an important condition for a deeper understanding of the events and processes of the time. Not only do we gain access to the sources for this exciting sequence of historical phenomena – a distance in time also allows the subject matter to shift from the boundary zone between political sciences and history clearly into the sphere of the latter, thus becoming free of daily political interests. We trust that the authors of the present volume will become active participants in shaping this process."
Regional Studies, 2001
Following the collapse of state-socialism a decade ago, Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs) opted for democracy and market economy. There was a widespread belief that transition to a market economy via neo-liberal 'shock therapy' would lead to a quick closure of the wealth gap with the West. A decade later, however, neo-liberal expectations of convergence under market conditions never materialized. Instead, 'New Europe' has been experiencing fragmentation and growing disparity between 'West' and 'East' and also within the 'East' itself. In examining regional patterns, and building on the strengths of institutional and 'radical' approaches, this article challenges neo-liberal accounts of uneven development in Eastern Europe. It argues that diverging economic trajectories should be understood in the light of the structural legacies of both the state-socialist and pre-socialist past and the way these are exposed to, and interact with, international political economy.
The politics of economic reform in Central and Eastern Europe
1992
The unexpected collapse of communism in Central and Eastern Europe in 1989 ushered in a triple transition: political, economic and social. This course deals with the politics and dilemmas of creating a functioning market economy in the context of dramatic political and social change. In order to appreciate the formidable challenges that the newly democratic regimes were facing at the outset of the reform process, the course first analyzes the economic and political nature of the socialist system, its reform attempts, as well as the causes of its final collapse. The seminar then engages prominent interdisciplinary debates concerning optimal way of "building" capitalism, drawing on literatures from political science, economics and sociology. The debates considered pertain to privatization, restructuring, and the role of the state in the economy and in the transition process. While the readings devote much attention to the domestic politics of economic and state reform, the course also examines the central role that the European Union accession process plays in setting the reform agenda. The final part of the course analyzes the social consequences of economic reform and discusses the institutionalization of social space. Course Requirements 1. Class Participation-20% 2. Reader Responses-35%-one page reflection on the readings (10 required), emailed by 3 p.m. the day before class 3. Country outline and 10 min. presentation in week 4 (group project)-10% 4. Final Research Paper (15 p.) or take-home final exam (12 p.)-35% Readings The following books can be purchased at the Yale bookstore (also on reserve at CCL):