Is it safe to use a ureteral access sheath in an unstented ureter? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Predicting an Effective Ureteral Access Sheath Insertion: A Bicenter Prospective Study
Journal of Endourology, 2014
Introduction: The use of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) may provide significant advantages, particularly, in the treatment of a large renal stone burden. However, in some patients, the passage of a UAS up the ureter is impossible. We prospectively evaluated the ability to insert a 14F UAS and analyzed the possible predictors for an effective insertion. Patients and Methods: In a bicenter prospective study, 248 consecutive patients undergoing ureteroscopy and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) were recruited. In each case, we attempted initially to pass a 14F Flexor-Cook UAS. If passage was difficult, gradual dilation using semirigid ureteral dilators (Cook Medical) was performed. Patients were categorized into three groups: effective passage, with and without dilation, and failure to pass the UAS. Age, gender, body-mass index (BMI), an indwelling Double-J stent, and a history of previous ureteroscopy or Double-J stent were all analyzed, as possible predictors for an effective UAS insertion. Results: In 22% of the patients, we could not pass a 14F UAS. Of the preoperative parameters that were examined, we found three independent predictors for an effective 14F UAS insertion: age (odds ratio: 1.5 and 95% CI [1.3, 1.9]), previous same-side procedures (odds ratio: 9.7 and 95% CI [8.3, 14.5]), and an indwelling Double-J stent (odds ratio: 21.73 and 95% CI [20, 30]). The gender, BMI, and side of surgery did not predict the success rate. Conclusions: Insertion of a 14F UAS before RIRS may fail in approximately one-fifth of the patients. An indwelling Double-J stent, a history of previous ureteroscopy or Double-J stent, and older age are all significant predictors for an effective 14F UAS insertion.
Comparison of commonly utilized ureteral access sheaths: A prospective randomized trial
Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia
Objective: We aimed to evaluate and compare the functional characteristics, safety profile and effectiveness of two commonly used ureteral access sheaths (UAS) during flexible ureteroscopy. Methods: After institutional review board approval, patients with proximal ureteral or kidney stones requiring flexible ureteroscopy and UAS were prospectively randomized to group I or group II according to the type of access sheath used. Primary outcome was incidence of intraoperative complications. Results: Eighty-eight patients were enrolled in the study, 44 patients in each group. Sheath size 12/14 FR was used in both cohorts. Median (IQR) stone size was 10 mm (7-13.5) and 10.5 mm (7.37-14) in group I and II respectively (p = 0.915). Nineteen and twenty patients, in group I and II respectively, were pre-stented. Subjective resistance with insertion of the UAS was observed in 9 and 11 patients in group I and II respectively (p = 0.61) while failed insertion was encountered in one patient in gr...
World Journal of Urology, 2019
Purpose To compare the outcomes (stone free rate and complications) of renal stone treatment with and without the use of ureteral access sheath (UAS). The worldwide use of UAS has risen over the last decade; however, questions still remain on the safety and outcomes with its use. We wanted to look at the role of UAS for treatment of consecutive renal stones over a 7-year period. Methods The outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and stone treatment (FURS) for renal stones with and without the use of UAS was prospectively compared from March 2012 to July 2018. Patients were divided into two groups: group-1 where UAS was used for stone treatment and group-2 where a UAS was not used. Data were collected prospectively on consecutive patients for demographics, stone size, location and number, pre and post-operative stent usage, operative time duration, stone free rate (SFR), length of stay and complications. Results During the study period, 338 patients underwent FURS for renal stones, of which a UAS was used for 203 (60%) patients. The mean age of patients was 56 years (range 2-89 years) with a male:female ratio of 204:134. The mean cumulative stone size and the mean number of stones was 16.5 ± 10.8 mm and 11.37 ± 8.08 mm (P < 0.001), and 2.17 ± 1.99 and 1.66 ± 1.50 (P = 0.009) for groups 1 and 2 respectively. The pre and post-operative stent insertion rates were similar in the two groups. The procedural time was longer in group-1 (54.8 ± 25.8 min) compared to group-2 (41.3 ± 22.2 min) (P < 0.001). The SFR for group-1 (88%) was slightly lower than group-2 (94%) although this was not statistically significant (P = 0.07). There were no intra-operative complications in either of the groups. Post-operative complications were seen in eight patients in group-1 (7 Clavien I/II and 1 Clavien IVa) and two patients in group-2 (Clavien I) (P = 0.19). Conclusion The use of UAS for renal stones is safe with no intra-operative complications noted in our series. Good stone-free rates were obtained for large and multiple renal stones with a small risk of minor complications post-operatively.
Assessment of stricture formation with the ureteral access sheath
Urology, 2003
To analyze the long-term incidence of ureteral stricture formation in a series of patients in whom a new-generation ureteral access sheath was used. A new generation of ureteral access sheaths has been developed to facilitate ureteroscopic procedures. However, some have questioned their safety and whether the device might cause significant ureteral trauma. Between September 1999 and July 2001, 150 consecutive ureteroscopic procedures with adjunctive use of an access sheath were performed. A retrospective chart review to April 2002 was done. Of the 150 patients, 130 underwent ureteroscopy for ureteral stones. Patients who underwent endoureterotomy or treatment of transitional cell carcinoma were excluded from this analysis. Sixty-two patients had follow-up greater than 3 months and were included in the analysis. Overall, 71 ureteroscopic procedures were performed, with 9 patients undergoing multiple procedures. Ninety-two percent of the patients had pathologic findings above the ilia...
We aimed to compare different treatment approaches in patients with failed ureteral access sheath placement during first flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS) session. Patients with kidney stones measuring 1-2 cm, presented to our urology clinic between April 2019 and April 2021, were included in the study for evaluation. Patients were randomized into two groups, in case of a failed ureteral access sheath placement during the first f-URS session. In group 1, ureteral JJ stent was placed for dilation and second session of f-URS was planned 4-6 weeks later. In group 2, mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) was performed in the same session. Pre-operative demographic data, operative and post-operative characteristics including complications and success rates were compared. Patients were assessed by Short-Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires to compare overall life quality after each procedure. Twenty-four patients were included in each group. Pre-operative demographic data and stone character...
Journal of Endourology, 2016
Objective: To investigate the effectivity of 4.5 F Ultra-thin Ureteroscope (UT-URS) without any need for active or passive dilation in the treatment of adult patient population in whom ureteral orifices cannot be engaged using conventional URS. Method: Among a total of 512 adult patients who had undergone URS between April 2012, and November 2015 in our department for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes, 43 (8.4 %) patients required ureteral dilation because we couldn't engage ureteral orifice. In adult patients in whom we couldn't engage ureteral orifice with 7.5 F, and 8 F semirigid URS, we tried to complete the operation using 4.5F UT-URS without resorting to dilation. Age, and gender of the patients, indication for operation, stone size, and location, Operative times, laterality of stone(s), and stone-free rates, length of hospital stay, and complications were recorded. Result: Mean age of the patients was 34.5±11.2 (21-66 years) years. The patients had undergone operations for ureteral stone (n=39), unexplained hydronephrosis (n=2), and ureteral stenosis (n=2). Mean stone size was 8.2±2.3 (4-18) mm. Mean operative time was 64.2±13.5 minutes. Thirty seven of 39 patients complete stone-free rate (94.8 %) was achieved. Mean length of hospital stay was 8.9±5.8 hours. Conclusion: It has been demonstrated that in adult patient population in whom ureteral orifices cannot be engaged using conventional URS, ureteral access could be achieved with 4.5 F UT-URS without any need for dilation. At the same time, use of 4.5 F UT-URS resulted in an acceptable treatment success, and lower complication rates in most of these patients without the need for a second session.
Central European journal of urology, 2017
Use of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) within flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) for the management of kidney and ureteral stones has shown improvements in its effectiveness, but it is also associated with increased risk of ureteral injury. Use of ureteral stent (US) after fURS is recommended by some authors, because of its role in reducing postoperative pain and preventing complications. Our objective is to determine if postoperative stenting is necessary in pre-stented patients that underwent fURS using UAS. A retrospective history review of patients who underwent fURS using UAS at our hospital between July 1(st) 2013 and May 31(st) 2016 was performed. Only pre-stented patients were included. All procedures were performed using the same UAS (Boston Navigator TM., 11-13 Fr.). Patients were separated according to the use or not of postoperative US. The same US (26 cm 6 Fr percuflex, Boston Scienfic) was used for all stented patients. Clinical parameters, stone demographics, operative time ...
Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery, 2018
BACKGROUND: Ureteral access sheaths (UASs) are commonly used in retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS). Despite their advantages, there is a risk of ureteral trauma during their placement and subsequent stricture following surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the UAS force of insertion (FOI) during placement and its impact on ureteral trauma. METHODS: Seven female patients who underwent RIRS for kidney stones were included in the study. A digital force gauge (Chatillon DFX II; Ametek Test and Calibration Instruments, Largo, Florida, USA) was connected to the distal end of the UAS and the UAS FOI was continuously measured during insertion. UASs of different sizes were used and ureteral injury was evaluated under direct vision with the Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS) score. RESULTS: Five pre-stented patients and 2 non-stented patients were included in the study. The size of the UASs used in non-stented patients was 9.5/11.5-F and 10/12-F, whereas one 11/13-F and four 12/14-F sheaths were used in the pre-stented patients. The highest maximal UAS FOI observed was 5.9 Newton (N) in a pre-stented patient with a 12/14-F UAS, where a second attempt was performed after initial failure. The lowest maximal UAS FOI was 0.91 N in a non-stented patient using a 9.5/11.5-F UAS. A semirigid ureteroscopy with a 7.8-F sheath was performed in this patient prior UAS placement. The PULS score was 1 in the 2 non-stented patients and 0 in all of the pre-stented patients. CONCLUSION: In this small cohort, a preoperative JJ stent seemed to protect the ureter, even with larger diameter UASs of 12/14-F. Non-stented RIRS with a UAS is possible, but may cause low-grade ureteral trauma.
Urology, 2005
Objectives. To evaluate the effect of ureteral access sheaths (UASs) on stone-free rates (SFRs) during ureteroscopic treatment of renal calculi. Several advantages of UASs during flexible ureteroscopy have been documented. However, no study has evaluated their impact on SFRs. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed all ureteroscopic cases for the management of renal stones performed at our Stone Center. Data were stratified according to the use or lack of use of the UAS. The groups were stratified by stone location within the kidney. Stone-free status was determined at 2 months postoperatively by either intravenous urography with tomograms or noncontrast renal computed tomography in patients with contrast allergies. Results. A total of 256 ureteroscopic procedures for the removal of renal calculi were performed between 1997 and 2003 (173 with UAS and 83 without). The groups were similar in age, sex, and stone burden. Stents were placed in nearly 80% of patients. The lower renal pole represented the most common presenting location. Stone displacement with a ureteroscopic basket for efficient fragmentation was necessary in 34%. The overall SFR in the UAS group and non-UAS group was 79% and 67%, respectively (P ϭ 0.042). The SFRs were improved for calculi in all portions of the kidney. Conclusions. In addition to facilitating ureteroscopic access, reducing costs, and lowering intrarenal pressures, the results of the current study suggest that UASs improve SFRs during the management of renal calculi. It is now our current practice to use the UAS routinely during ureteroscopic treatment of renal and upper ureteral calculi. UROLOGY 66: 252-255, 2005.
Journal of Endourology
Introduction: Ureteral access sheaths (UASs) are frequently used during ureteroscopy (URS), but their use is not without potential risk. We investigated patterns of UAS use and associated outcomes across practices in Michigan within a quality improvement collaborative. Methods: The Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) Reducing Operative Complications from Kidney Stones (ROCKS) initiative maintains a web-based, prospective clinical registry of patients undergoing URS for urinary stone disease (USD). We analyzed all patients undergoing primary URS for renal and ureteral stones from June 2016 to July 2018 in the ROCKS registry. We determined rates of UAS usage across practices and associated outcomes, including 30-day emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalization, as well as stone-free rates. Using multivariate logistical regression, we determined the predictors of UAS use as well as outcomes, including stone-free rates, ED visits, and hospitalizations, associated with UAS use. Results: Of the 5316 URS procedures identified, UASs were used in 1969 (37.7%) cases. Stones were significantly larger and more likely to be located in the kidney in cases with UAS use. UAS use during URS varied greatly across practices (1.9%-96%, p < 0.05). After adjusting for clinical and surgical risk factors, UAS use significantly increased the odds of postoperative ED visits (odds ratio [OR] = 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.93, p < 0.05) and hospitalization (OR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.22-2.56, p < 0.05) as well as decreased the odds of being stone free (OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.57-0.99, p < 0.05). Conclusions: In the current study, UAS use during URS for USD was not associated with an increased likelihood of being stone free; moreover, it increased the odds of a postoperative ED visit and or hospitalization. Our findings demonstrate that UAS use is not without risk and should be employed judiciously.