Byzantine Commentaries on Ancient Greek Texts, 12th-15th Centuries (original) (raw)
2022
This is the first volume to explore the commentaries on ancient texts produced and circulating in Byzantium. It adopts a broad chronological perspective (from the twelfth to the fifteenth century) and examines different types of commentaries on ancient poetry and prose within the context of the study and teaching of grammar, rhetoric, philosophy and science. By discussing the exegetical literature of the Byzantines as embedded in the socio-cultural context of the Komnenian and Palaiologan periods, the book analyses the frameworks and networks of knowledge transfer, patronage and identity building that motivated the Byzantine engagement with the ancient intellectual and literary tradition.
Related papers
Aspects of the Byzantine Literary Appropriation of Classical Culture
Phronema 36:2, 2021
The purpose of this article is to outline how certain figures of the Byzantine ecclesial tradition appropriated (not merely preserved) the philosophical and literary output of ancient Greece and Rome, chiefly to articulate holy mysteries crucial for our salvation. Subsequently, it will examine how Sts Justin Martyr, Basil the Great, Gregory the Theologian, John Chrysostom, and Theodore the Studite industriously adapted elements of Classical philosophy, mythology, oratory, poetry, and epistolography to make the message of the Gospel more palatable to their audiences, including potential converts. More precisely, it will discuss the literary and cultural renaissance during which Byzantium emerged before evaluating: (i) Justin's positive appraisal of the Greco-Roman philosophical traditions, as suggested by his articulation of the 'logos spermatikos' doctrine during the violent suppression of Christianity by Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius; (ii) the Cappadocians' defence of the Church's share in the Classical inheritance in response to Julian the Apostate; (iii) Chrysostom's role in the transmission of rhetoric and the significance of Libanius the Sophist in this regard; and (iv) the Studite's revival of epigrams and the art of letter writing amidst the iconoclastic controversy instigated by Leo V. The article will therefore highlight key methods used by the Church Fathers to support the new pragmatic paradigms that the Orthodox faith brought to society.
The present paper proposes a new periodization model for the history of Byzantine literature between the 11th and the 15th century. The paper examines first the use of the historical model in the periodization schemata of various overviews of Byzantine literature along with the essentialist and teleological concepts inherent in this model. Two further sections present the arguments concerning the insignificance of 1204 and 1453 for a literary history of Byzantium because both dates did not leave a visible imprint on the way people wrote after the disasters had occured, while their presence as historical markers of an abrupt end obscures the continuities and the important changes that took place around them. In two last sections the paper offers two new boundaries that are not instantaneous moments in history but fluid and broad segments of time in its unbroken stream. The years around 1050 and 1350 are marked by a series of changes in the way logoi were perceived both in school and in actual practice, and it is, therefore, proposed that Byzantine literature from the eleventh century onwards is shaped by two fluid periods: 1050-1350 and 1350-1500.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.