The contemporary definition of university social responsibility with quantifiable sustainability (original) (raw)
Related papers
Universities' Social Responsibility (USR) and Sustainable Development: A Conceptual Framework
SSRG International Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 2017
The concept of social responsibility is no longer confined to charitable and voluntary activity, but it is in fact a broader and more comprehensive concept that comprises solutions for societies economic, social and environmental problems. Moreover, sustainable development cannot be achieved in isolation from the close relationship between higher education and its institutions-namely universities-and society. Universities are considered an essential pillar of society, because they play a pivotal role in elevating awareness regarding social responsibility among its students, staff members and other employees, in a manner that makes them behave as societal personalities professing collective views and not opting to adopt individual thinking. Accordingly, this research paper aims to present a conceptual framework clarifying the role of social responsibility of universities in sustainable development. It addresses the concept of social responsibility and its various aspects; the close relationship between it and sustainable development and the role of universities in strengthening this relationship. At the end, the paper provides number of recommendations that guarantee the enhancement of the role of universities in the social responsibility that is anticipated to achieve and support sustainable development effort
Interrelation Between the University's Social Responsibility and Sustainability
EDULEARN proceedings, 2019
Since the 1990s the Russian universities have been under constant reformation-first in a strive to survive, then under the aegis of the Bologna process, later according to the American business model of 'education services providers', with a number of 'big' Russian universities having achieved some serious results and positions in global rankings and two thirds of the total number of Russian universities closed down or taken over by the Ministry's favourites. Like many revolutionary reforms, the higher education reforms in the Russian Federation took little notice of people working for universities doomed to closure or merger, so today, when the Russian government speaks much about sustainability, the situation with two fundamentals of corporate sustainable developmentcorporate social responsibility and wellbeing, arouses my particular research interest. The purpose of the research was to understand and describe the current state of implementation of CSR and wellbeing concepts at universities worldwide and Russian universities in particular and identify the factors hindering successful development of the concepts in the Russian higher education system. The results of the study show that CSR and wellbeing concepts have been understood and implemented differently at different Russian universities due to a number of reasons identified within the research. Based on the findings, recommendations were formulated aimed at facilitating the implementation of the University CSR and wellbeing concepts. The results can be applied to improve the situation with CSR and staff's wellbeing both in Russian and other universities of the world.
University Social Responsibility (USR) in the Global Context
Business and Professional Ethics Journal
Higher education institutions worldwide have begun to embrace sustainability issues and engage their campuses and communities in such efforts, which have led to the development of integrity and ethical values in these organizations and their relationships with stakeholders. This study provides a literary review of the concept of University Social Responsibility (USR) and sustainability programs worldwide, grouped into eight research streams: conceptual framework, strategic planning and USR, educating on USR, spreading USR, reporting and USR, evaluation of USR, barriers and accelerators and case studies. The aforementioned research streams served as a context to explore best practices in sustainability on a global basis.
2019
This article discusses about social responsibility from the point of view of higher education. The university in general is an institution with the highest honor in the academic environment. Then the university becomes the instrument of social climbing for most people in the society of developing countries. University social responsibility (USR) is a principle for social movements, which uses an ethical approach to develop and engage with local and global communities to maintain ecological, environmental, technical, social, and economic development. USR acts is a crucial player for social change because USR implies having an ethical quality policy, which regulates the performance of the university community. USR has an impact not only on universities but also on the global community and society. Keywords: University, Social Responsibility, Community Development
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Responsible higher education institutions have an impact on society and economic, environmental, and social development. These effects define the axes of the socially responsible management of the universities. The concept of university social responsibility (USR) manages these relationships to produce a positive impact on society through higher education, research, and the transfer of knowledge and technology, as well as education for sustainability. For this study, worldwide research into this subject was studied for the period 1970–2019. A bibliometric analysis of 870 articles was made, obtaining results for the scientific productivity of the journals, authors, institutions, and countries contributing to this research. The main category is business, management, and accounting. The most productive journal is the Business and Society Review, while the California Management Review is the most cited. The authors with the most articles are Stavnezer, Luo, and Lanero. The most producti...
A Review Literature on University Social Responsibility Initiatives in the Global Context
Journal of emerging technologies and innovative research, 2019
Social responsibility is gradually considered as an essential aspect of the higher education system, mainly for the universities. Some Universities are addressing important practical issues of the economy towards enhancing skills of young minds, giving them practical orientation, making them conscious of their responsibility towards society and finally leading to community empowerment. The experts from Europe, Africa, North America, Latin America and Asia concluded that the social responsibility of specific universities should be fostered promoting the preparation of specific Social Responsibility programmes at institutional level, including three main dimensions: social, economic and environmental. University Social Responsibility (USR) plays a roadmap which gives a vision to universities for developing solutions of economic, social, and environmental problems in society. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on University Social Responsibility Initiatives in the gl...
In the context of social responsibility, the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility and University Social Responsibility is not a newcomer in the business world. The practice of benevolence, philanthropy, and social duties has been around for as early as medieval European times, especially during Christianity's existence. However, this concept holds no united theoretical meaning, nor commonality in the understanding of the idea. It is still considered an emerging organizational and communication business practice, especially in globalization and corporate sustainability. The way of social responsibility has further evolved into a more proactive role in our society, political spheres, and the planet as a whole. A global community of business organizations has ushered a new era of commitment to corporate sustainability. The international business believes that any corporate sustainability success depends on absolute loyalty on the concept from a corporate organization's top leadership. The triple bottom line approach considers a balance between corporate profitability and the responsibility towards people and the planet's sustainability. Furthermore, the gap between the diversity of communities, its requirements and expectations, and the variations in the business characteristics, organization, and corporate structure in any corporate entity must be considered well. From this, a context of coherence towards a unified theory on CSR and USR should not be impossible to achieve.
Challenges in Teaching According to University Social Responsibility (Usr)
2020
In recent decades, the world has experienced great advances in terms of Corporate Social Responsibility. Educational institutions, especially those of higher education, have recently become interested in this topic as an integral part of society. In Ecuador, after the change of government and the educational transformation, the University Social Responsibility (USR) has been integrated as part of key management indicators. This article is about one of the main elements in education that is teaching. This research starts as a part of a university project that has the purpose of identifying how teaching activities contribute in social responsibility. The research takes place in nine public and private universities which are located in zone three in Ecuador. The data is quantitative and qualitative based on different surveys in a population of 67,167 students, professors, and administrators. As result, there are six challenges for teaching and the USR in Ecuador, from an external persp...
Changes have led higher education institutes to question their traditional roles. Many declarations and frameworks highlight the importance of fulfilling social responsibility of higher education institutes. The study aims at developing a framework of university social responsibility and sustainability (USR&S) with focus on South Valley University (SVU) as a case study of Egyptian Universities. The study used meetings with 12 vice deans of community services and environmental affairs on social responsibility and environmental issues. The proposed framework integrates social responsibility with strategic management through the establishment and maintenance of the vision, mission, values, goals and management systems; elaboration of policies; provision of actions; evaluation of services and development of social collaboration with stakeholders to meet current and future needs of the community and environment. The framework links between different stakeholders internally and externally using communication and reporting tools. The results show that SVU integrates social responsibility and sustainability in its strategic plans. It has policies and actions however fragmented and lack of appropriate structure and budgeting. The proposed framework could be valuable for researchers and decision makers of the Egyptian Universities. The study proposed recommendations and highlighted building on the results and conducting future research.
Revisiting University Social Responsibility
2021
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) as an organisation's collective responsibility for its impact on society has become an established concept in management scholarship since the 1990s. De Bakker, Groenewegen, and den Hond (2005) showcase the variety of institutional responsibilityrelated concepts since 1950, ranging from 1950 to 2002 until they were merged into CSR by Archie Carroll (1991). Since the beginning of the 1990s, CSR has received immense attention from academia, evidenced by a rise in the number of publications in the leading management journals (De Bakker et al., 2005). Nowadays, the concept has departed from an initial definition of an organisation's economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibilities as proposed by Carroll. Moreover, it is no longer considered a voluntary activity, which was a prevalent characteristic in the first decade of the 2000s (Crane, Matten, & Spence, 2008). Rather, the conceptual dimensions of economic, environmental,