British Migrants, Criminality and Deportation: Shaping the Australian Post-war Approach (original) (raw)
Related papers
Australia’s Long History of Immigration, Policing and the Criminal Law
2019
Modern immigration is a highly regulated procedure governing the mobility of peoples between sovereign jurisdictions. This procedure has been progressively refined since the late eighteenth century through mechanisms of government that have frequently deployed the apparatus of criminal law. In this chapter we examine the long history of the intersection of criminal law and policing regimes in the service of immigration control in Australia. We take the Australian case as exemplary rather than exceptional. The particular conditions of British settlement of the convict colonies and the later construction of the White Australia Policy constitute a particular local formation of a more general phenomenon found in the development of modern states. Through a brief history of Australian immigration law and policing we highlight both the long-standing criminalisation of migration regulation breaches, and the persistent governmental concerns with the exclusion of undesirable populations, espe...
Immigration and Criminality: Australia's Post-War Inquiries
The relationship between immigration and crime rates has long been a topic of robust debate in criminology and sociology, especially for scholars of the United States. Researchers in those fields have highlighted divergent factors to explain high arrest rates including the presence of ethnic gangs, media reporting, racial profiling, over-policing of immigrant communities, and wider issues of social dislocation brought about by migration. By contrast, historians have given little consideration to the topic. This lack of historical investigation is particularly curious in studies of Australia's postwar immigration given the political importance of the issue at the time. Immigration and criminality — or more precisely, whether immigrants committed more crime or worse crimes than the Australian-born population — became a prominent topic of media coverage and political interest in the early 1950s. In fact, the question of migrants' criminality was so important that it was the subject of the first research inquiries ever ordered by the Department of Immigration. Our article examines this research, explaining the impetus for the inquiries, their findings, and their historical significance. We conclude by outlining how this topic can illuminate new areas of inquiry in immigration history.
National Security and Immigration in Australia's Twentieth-Century History
Australian Policy and History, 2010
Modern states are founded on security, ideally to protect their citizens from harm and the state itself from threats variously characterised as subversion or open attack. The constitutional powers reserved to the Commonwealth of Australia at Federation included two relating to migration and migrants. The deployment of these powers historically has had the purpose of constructing an ideal settler community, initially of white British stock, more recently of prosperous and harmonious but cosmopolitan character. Those powers have also been at the heart of national defence of Australia’s borders, and thus an instrument of the security apparatus of the Australian state. This paper examines this dimension of the history of security in Australia as an example of the contradictions and complexities of defending the state and its citizens from the hazards of difference, dissent and outright opposition. Starting from the well-known and highly contentious treatment of Dr Mohammed Haneef the paper then considers three earlier cases in the development of this dimension of Australian security, all centred on the immigration power. In 1923 two envoys visiting Australia on behalf of the Irish republican movement were arrested and charged under the Crimes Act before being later deported. Their case became a significant legal test of the Commonwealth’s immigration power. Its genesis and significance has been little appreciated, especially in its international context and the history of Australia’s status as a Dominion of the British Empire. I will consider this case in the context of the extent of state obligations to the security interests of other states. In a much better known example in 1934, the Czech-born cosmopolitan intellectual Egon Kisch was famously the subject of a protracted and mishandled attempt by the Australian government to prevent him visiting the country to speak at an anti-war and anti-Fascist congress. Australian security interest was prompted by information that Kisch was a Communist, and the event at which he was to speak a front for the Stalinist Comintern. But the domestic negotiation of the security interest involved proved difficult to resolve in the face of profound political divisions in the 1930s. The outcome was ignominy for the government, and a stimulus to the development of a civil liberties movement with a profound antagonism to the security agencies. My third example of the hazards of border management as an instrument of national security draws from the unhappy history of the White Australia Policy. During the 1920s and 1930s the representatives of the Chinese government in Australia conducted a successful campaign to ease the discriminatory management of Chinese passenger movement between the two countries. The objective was achieved in the face of policy commitment to the White Australia Policy, by a diplomatic campaign of quiet persistence, appealing to international norms to respect the dignity of those travelling between countries. The course of this campaign and its outcome suggests another dimension to the politics of security exercised as something other than crude force or secretive surveillance – its necessary attention to the management of both domestic and international relations.
“The Interconnectedness of British and Australian Immigration Controls in the 20th Century”
The International History Review, 2021
The histories of immigration control in Britain and Australia in the twentieth century are often contrasted, with Britain imposing few formal restrictions on Commonwealth migration until the 1960s and Australia slowly weakening the 'White Australia Policy' throughout the postwar period. However as much as there is a divergence between the two immigration control systems, we argue that there is also a high level of interconnectedness between the British and Australian efforts to control migration across the century. In particular, policymakers in Britain looked to replicate aspects of Australia's strict control system, while many politicians in Australia saw British immigration policy as a warning to the immigration reform. By the end of the century, both countries had established strict border control systems that converged with similar systems across Western Europe and North America.
Border Control and Undesirables in Britain and Australia
Immigrants & Minorities, 40(1-2), 2022
‘Undesirables’ explores the various border control practices employed against migrant communities that have been branded as undesirable by the authorities, including exclusion, deportation, monitoring and detention. The contemporary approaches to undesirable migrant groups have deep historical connections. This special issue offers evidence that current policy and practices are products of a long-term historical recourse. This proposed issue explores how certain migrant groups (on the grounds of race, gender, ethnicity, political ideology, and perceived criminality) were identified as ‘undesirable’ by the authorities of the state and subjected to various border and policing practices. This often involved the exclusion of ‘undesirable’ migrants at the border or the deportation of individuals if found to be ‘undesirable’, but also included the surveillance, arrest and detention of undesirables from migrant groups by police and intelligence agencies once they had settled in the destination country.This special issue shows that border control practices extended far beyond the physical border and that as well as using border practices to reject or expel ‘undesirable’ migrants, the state highly monitored those ‘undesirable’ migrants who had been allowed to enter the country. This builds on Paddy Hillyard’s (1993) theory of the ‘suspect community’, which described the heavy policing of the Irish community in Britain during the 1970s-80s. While some studies have looked at how some community groups have replaced others in the contemporary government’s security agenda (Pantazis and Pemberton 2009), this special issue showcases that the ‘undesirability’ concept has historical origin that still influences current approaches to policies, hence it warrants a more comprehensive investigation and reflection.
Historicising Australian Deportation of Suspect and Undesirable Migrant Communities
International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 2023
The overall aim of the paper is to present evidence on the factors underpinning historical deportation cases, by exploring the reasons, explanations and patterns related to deportation in Australia. The purpose is to consider whether these historical factors are antecedent to current forms of deportation occurring in Australia, and to bring to the fore potential recurring patterns. Deportation is currently conceptualised by border criminologists as a punitive tool of discipline and control, within the realm of penal powers. Some of this work on the ‘deportation regime’ asserts that certain migrants, or groups of migrants, are undesirable: their identity, (not)belonging and punishment have become inherently intertwined, and their mobility has become politicised and criminalised. This article theorises that deportation has been used in Australia, now and in the past, to expel individuals who are viewed as detrimental to the ‘health’ of the host society. The ‘deportation categories’ demonstrate that migrants’ desirability has historically been a temporary condition, shifting over time in line with the state’s requirements. They also demonstrate the historical regime of criminalisation of undesirable others enacted through Australia’s border control regime.
Controlling the ‘alien’ in mid-twentieth century Australia: the origins and fate of a policing role
Policing & Society, 2009
The capacity of police to manage immigrant populations in times of conflict was developed in the course of the twentieth century through a multiplicity of techniques and strategies. Inter-agency and cross-jurisdictional capability for the ends of population surveillance and crime control was historically contingent on institutional initiatives that are rarely explored. An important origin of such capability in Australia was the Conference of Police Commissioners, first held in 1903. Its agenda after the First World War was preoccupied with the management of aliens, the immigrant populations of Australia. This paper explores the institutional and political contexts that shaped the control of ‘aliens’ in Australia’s early and mid-twentieth century with particular interest in the development of policing powers and techniques that operated within and without the crime control and prevention mandates that are most commonly associated with the modern public police. During these decades Australian police leaders, drawing on their own and international experience in two World Wars, expanded their vision of what policing of the alien demanded. By the early post-war years they sought universal surveillance of migrants through the still developing technologies of fingerprint and photographic databases. Their failure to achieve what they demanded at this time was a signal of their subordination in a politics of immigration that prioritised assimilation and integration of large new populations as a national undertaking.
JISPO Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 2018
In 2006, Australia under the Howard government proposed a citizenship test aimed at restricting immigration and toughening citizenship requirements. To understand this proposed citizenship, this essay attempts to analyse the basic ideas of the test by explaining its possible relationship with the Australia's past history and Australia's dependence on the 'superpower' countries in the issue. It explains that the proposed citizenship test reflected John Howard's political brands and manifested his wonderful skills in understanding and exploiting the living fears of 'the other' among Australian people for political gain in the his second term. The huge support for the proposed citizenship test indicated that the fear of 'the other' and 'potential enemies' was still evident among Australian. It also served as evident that multiculturalism was under threat because people considered it as a policy that undermines dominant culture. The article argues that Australia's colonial past still plays a role in people's attitudes and government policies. "The chains of colonial inheritance" has not disappeared in contemporary Australia.
"This article examines the ‘vision splendid’ that existed for Australian migration following World War II. That vision (championed by the then Minister for Immigration, Arthur Calwell) was myopic, but is still pertinent to current debates on Australian Migration, particularly in the way that migrants were placed in categories of the desirable. This paper uses a particular migrant group, the Temple Society (Tempelgesellschaft, also known as the Templers) to illustrate the concerns of 1940s immigration policy. This group had a number of colonies in the British Mandate of Palestine, but were interned in Australia during World War II and underwent postwar investigations by the then newly formed Department of Immigration."