Towards a Digital Epistemology (original) (raw)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78724-0

Sign up for access to the world's latest research

checkGet notified about relevant papers

checkSave papers to use in your research

checkJoin the discussion with peers

checkTrack your impact

Abstract

Regarding these commercial rights a non-exclusive license has been granted to the publisher. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Epistemic Processes

Epistemic Processes, 2018

The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Digitalization Cases Vol. 2

Management for Professionals, 2021

The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

The Importance of Being Digital

The Humanities in the Digital: Beyond Critical Digital Humanities

In this chapter, I present the post-authentic framework, a theoretical framework for knowledge creation in the digital, and I introduce two concepts central to the framework, symbiosis and mutualism. In light of the considerations reasoned in Chap. 1, I discuss and question the relevance of notions of authenticity and completeness in relation to digital objects. I take the example of a digital cultural heritage object to highlight how ideas of authenticity and completeness have consequences not only for the production of digital heritage and with respect to heritage values and practices but, more widely, for our understanding of digital objects and knowledge production in a digital society. Finally, I rework such notions using the formation of the digital heritage collection ChroniclItaly 3.0 as an example of how the post-authentic framework can guide the fluid interactions between human and technological processes that are required in the contemporary context of digital knowledge c...

Policy Practice and Digital Science

Public Administration and Information Technology, 2015

The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Digital Enlightenment Yearbook 2014: Introduction

Digital Enlightenment Yearbook 2014, 2014

This is the introduction to the third Digital Enlightenment Yearbook, published by the Digital Enlightenment Forum (http://www.digitalenlightenment.org/), which aims to shed light on today’s rapid technological changes and their impact on society and its governance, taking inspiration from Enlightenment thought as well as from the many transformations and evolutions that have taken place since. This year the focus of the Yearbook is “social networks and social machines, surveillance and empowerment.” In what is now the well-established tradition of the Yearbooks, different stakeholders in society and various disciplinary communities (technology, law, philosophy, sociology, economics, policymaking) bring their very different opinions and perspectives to bear on this topic, forming a basis for inspiring and constructive cross-disciplinary discussions.

Digital Humanities: Historical Epistemology and the Formation of Concepts, in: Infotheca, Journal for Digital Humanities 11/2015 (ISSN: 2217-9461 online edition)

Digital humanities is a transdisciplinary scientific area that can be seen both as a research subject and as a methodological tool. It connects humanities with information and communication sciences, that is, it connects the pragmatic (user and programing) dimension with the media historical dimension of information technologies and their usage. The term digital humanities hasn't been established until the emergence of the Internet and realization of the importance of processing of and research over large data sets. Terms that were used before, such as Humanities Computing and Computer Linguistics haue been replaced with the concept of humanities in the context of not only digital surroundings, but also digital artefacts as subjects of interest for scientists in the broad field of social sciences. In this paper, we outlined not only the history of Digital Humanities, but also the history of the ideas of digitization, i.e. converting data into another formst of presentation, more complex for humans, but easier for machine, Computer processing. It is important to point out that in this nexus of disciplines and scientific areas, avid representatives of digital thought are not in conflict with practitioners of digitization. Both of them, in spite of different traditions, follow the general live of the shared ideology of unfaltering confidence in the scientific truth provided by technology. The aim of this text is to reflect upon that truth from the perspective of socio-cultural historical archaeology of science and media.

Knowledge, People, and Digital Transformation

Contributions to Management Science

The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (149)

  1. Huhtamo, Erkki. (2013). Illusions in Motion: Media Archaeology of the Moving Panorama and Related Spectacles. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  2. Ihde, D. (2002). Bodies in Technology. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.
  3. Ingvarsson, J. (2012). Literature Through Radio: Distance and Silence in The War of the Worlds, 1938/1898. In J. Bruhn, A. Gjelsvik, & E. F. Hanssen (Eds.), Adaptation Studies: New Challenges, New Directions. London: Continuum.
  4. Jockers, M. (2013). Macroanalysis. Digital Methods and Literary History. Urbana/ Chicago/Springfield: University of Illinois Press.
  5. Kittler, F. A. (1990). Discourse Networks 1800/1900 (trans: Metteer, M., & C. Cullens). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  6. Krajewski, M. (2018). The Server. A Media History from the Present to the Baroque (trans: Iurascu, I). New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
  7. Lindhé, C. (2013). 'A Visual Sense Is Born in the Fingertips': Towards a Digital Ekphrasis, Digital Humanities Quarterly, 7(1). http://www.digital-humanities. org/dhq/vol/7/1/000161/000161.html. Accessed May 2020.
  8. Liu, A. (2014). Theses on the Epistemology of the Digital: Advice for the Cambridge Centre for Digital Knowledge. http://liu.english.ucsb.edu/theses-on-the- epistemology-of-the-digital-page/. Accessed Apr 2020.
  9. Liu, A. (2018). Friending the Past: The Sense of History in the Digital Age. Chicago/ London: The University of Chicago Press.
  10. Manning, J. (2002). The Emblem. London: Reaktion Books.
  11. Mazzocchi, P. (2008). Foucault, Benjamin and the Burden of History. Critical Studies in History, 1, 91-109. https://sites.google.com/site/historytheory/ csh1. Accessed May 2020.
  12. Moretti, F. (2013). Distant Reading. London/New York: Verso.
  13. Nietzsche, F. (1909). The Use and Abuse of History. In Thoughts Out of Season, Part II (trans: Collins, A.). Edinburgh/London: T.N. Foulis.
  14. North, M. (2001, December). Virtual Histories: The Year as Literary Period. Modern Language Quarterly, 62(4), 407-424.
  15. O'Gorman, M. (2006). E-Crit: Digital Media, Critical Theory and the Humanities. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  16. O'Gorman, M. (2012). Broken Tools and Misfit Toys: Adventures in Applied Media Theory. Canadian Journal of Communication, 37. https://cjc-online. ca/index.php/journal/article/view/2519/2767. Accessed May 2020.
  17. O'Gorman, M. (2015). Necromedia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  18. Önnerfors, A. (2017). "På Pegasens vingar -den svenska idéhistoriens digitala epistemologi" (On the Wings of the Pegas -The Digital Epistemology of the Swedish History of Ideas). Göteborg: Litteraturbanken. https://litteraturban- k e n . s e / p r e s e n t a t i o n e r / s p e c i a l o m r a d e n / I d e h i s t o r i k e r n . h t m l . Accessed Apr 2020.
  19. Parikka, Jussi. (2012). What is Media Archaeology? Cambridge: Polity. referenCes
  20. Carpenter, J. R. (2016). The Gathering Cloud 2016 [online artwork]. http:// luckysoap.com/thegatheringcloud/. Accessed Apr 2020.
  21. Essvik, O. (2018). The Enemies of Books: A Narrative 2014-2017. Göteborg: Rojal förlag.
  22. Foucault, M. (2002). The Archaeology of Knowledge (trans: Sheridan Smith, A. M.). London: Routledge.
  23. Giroux, A. (1989). A Theoretical and Historical Analysis of Pertinence-and Provenance-Based Concepts of Classification of Archives. Université de Montreal. https://open.librar y.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/831/ items/1.0088686. Accessed Apr 2020.
  24. Hegnhøj, M. (2014). Ella er mit navn vil du købe det?, Novel, Box with Sheets of Paper, and Hole Puncher Clippings. København: Jensen & Dalgaard.
  25. Hegnhøj, M. (2017). En prik og en streg. København: Jensen & Dalgaard.
  26. Heldén, J. (2006). The Prime Directive 2006 [online artwork]. http://www.afsn- itp.dk/galleri/primardirektivet/. Accessed Apr 2020.
  27. Kittler, F. A. (1997). In J. Johnston (Ed.), Literature, Media, Information Systems. Amsterdam: G+B Arts International.
  28. Lamberti, E. (2012). Marshall McLuhan's Mosaic: Probing the Literary Origins of Media Studies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  29. Lewis, C. T., & Short, C. (1849). Harpers' Latin Dictionary: A New Latin Dictionary Founded on the Translation of Freund's Latin-German Lexicon. https://www.latinitium.com/latin-dictionaries. Accessed May 2020.
  30. Lindhé, C. (2013). 'A Visual Sense Is Born in the Fingertips': Towards a Digital Ekphrasis. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 7(1). http://www.digitalhumanities. org/dhq/vol/7/1/000161/000161.html. Accessed Apr 2020.
  31. Liu, A. (2014). Theses on the Epistemology of the Digital: Advice for the Cambridge Centre for Digital Knowledge. http://liu.english.ucsb.edu/theses-on-the- epistemology-of-the-digital-page/. Accessed Apr 2020.
  32. Luther, M. (1522). Martin Luther's Second Invocavit Sermon on the True Way of Reform (Preached in Wittenberg on 10 March 1522). https://-t h e -w o r d -d i d - everything-martin-luthers-second-invocavit-sermon-on-the-true-way-of- reform-preached-in-wittenberg-on-10-march-1522/. Accessed May 2020.
  33. Manning, J. (2002). The Emblem. London: Reaktion.
  34. McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  35. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  36. McLuhan, M. (1967a). The Future of the Future Is the Present. Marshall McLuhan Speaks (web resource). http://www.marshallmcluhanspeaks.com/ prophecies/1967-the-future-of-the-future-is-the-present/. Accessed Apr 2020.
  37. McLuhan, M. (1967b). Media. Människans utbyggnader (trans. to Swedish Matz, R.). Stockholm: PAN/Norstedt.
  38. O'Gorman, M. (2006). E-Crit: Digital Media, Critical Theory and the Humanities. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  39. Järpvall, C. (2016). Pappersarbete: Formandet av och föreställningar om kontors- papper som medium (diss.). Lund: Mediehistoriskt Arkiv 34. http://portal. research.lu.se/portal/files/17063976/Pappersarbete.pdf (accessed July 2020).
  40. Theall, D. F. (1971). The Medium Is the Rear View Mirror. Understanding McLuhan. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
  41. Veel, K. (2009). Narrative Negotiations: Information Structures in Literary Fiction. Dissertation. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
  42. Wägner, E. (2002 [1908]). Stockholm stories: Men and other misfortunes & Stormy corner (trans. and afterword by Cain B. & Sweedler. U.. Bloomington, Indiana: Xlibris Corp.
  43. Wolf, G. (1996). The Wisdom of Saint Marshall, the Holy Fool. Wired, (1). https://www.wired.com/1996/01/saint-marshal/. Accessed Apr 2020.
  44. Burroughs, W. S. (1962). The Invisible Generation. WUSTL Digital Gateway Image Collections & Exhibitions. http://omeka.wustl.edu/omeka/items/ show/9535. Accessed Apr 2020.
  45. Crane, S. A. (2000). Curious Cabinets and Imaginary Museums. In S. A. Crane (Ed.), Museums and Memory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  46. Fleischer, R. (2009). Det postdigitala manifestet. Stockholm: Ink förlag.
  47. Gumbrecht, H. U. (2004). Production of Presence. What Meaning Cannot Convey. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  48. Håkansson, G. (1997). Operation B. Stockholm: Bonnier.
  49. Hansson, G. D. (1996). AB Neandertal. Stockholm: Bonnier.
  50. Hansson, G. D. (2008). Olunn, Lunnebok, Idegransöarna (Mackerell, Book of Puffins, The Yew Islands), Compilation. Stockholm: Bonnier.
  51. Hansson, G. D. (2009). "Över gränsen. Taxus o.a." (Crossing the Border. Taxus and Others). Unpublished manuscript, lecture.
  52. Hejlskov Larsen, S. (1971). Systemdigtningen: modernismens tredje fase. København: Munksgaard.
  53. Jönsson, J. (2012). med.bort.in. Stockholm: Bonnier.
  54. Jönsson, J. (2014). Mot, vidare, mot. Stockholm: Bonnier.
  55. Kelty, C. (2016). Participation. In B. Peters (Ed.), Digital Keywords: A Vocabulary of Information Society & Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  56. Latour, B. (1996). On Actor-Network Theory. A Few Clarifications Plus More Than and Few Complications. (Originally written in 1990, English version 1996). http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/P-67%20ACTOR- NETWORK.pdf. Accessed Apr 2020.
  57. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network- Theory. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
  58. Lindhé, C. (2013). 'A Visual Sense Is Born in the Fingertips': Towards a Digital Ekphrasis. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 7, nr 1. http://www.digitalhuman- ities.org/dhq/vol/7/1/000161/000161.html. Accessed Apr 2020.
  59. Lotass, L. (2001). Aerodynamiska tal. Stockholm: Bonnier.
  60. Lotass, L. (2007). Den vita jorden. Stockholm: Bonnier.
  61. Lotass, L. (2011). Fjärrskrift. Stockholm: Drucksache.
  62. Malmio, K. (2020). Du och jag, jag och du. Flerspråkighet, digitalisering och läsaren i Ralf Andtbackas Wunderkammer. Edda 03/2020.
  63. Marks, L. (2002). Touch: Sensuous Theory and Multisensory Media. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  64. Mauriès, P. (2015). Cabinets of Curiosities. London: Thames & Hudson.
  65. Önnerfors, A. (2017). På Pegasens vingar -den svenska idéhistoriens digitala epis- temologi. Litteraturbanken. https://litteraturbanken.se/presentationer/spe- cialomraden/Idehistorikern.html. Accessed Apr 2020.
  66. Palm, G. (1964). Världen ser dig: Själens furir och andra dikter. Stockholm: Norstedt.
  67. Peters, B. (2016). Digital. In B. Peters (Ed.), Digital Keywords: A Vocabulary of Information Society & Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  68. Pirholt, M. (2010, October 14). Ralf Andtbacka -Wunderkammer. Dikter. Dixikon: mest om uländsk kultur och litteratur. https://www.dixikon.se/ralf- andtbacka-wunderkammer-dikt/. Accessed Apr 2020.
  69. Printz-Påhlson, G. (1966). Gradiva och andra dikter. Stockholm: Bonnier.
  70. Printz-Påhlson, G. (2011). Letters of Blood and Other Works in English. Edited and trans Robert Achambeau. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.
  71. Sandström, I. (2017). Det kommande skallet/The Coming Shall, Box with Booklets. Göteborg: Autor.
  72. Sandström, I. (2019). Tvärsöver otysta tider/Across Unquiet Times. Dissertation. Göteborg: Autor.
  73. Sandström, I. The Pages. Research Project Website. http://www.howeacrossread- ing.imrisandstrom.com/. Accessed Apr 2020.
  74. Schrey, D. (2014). Analogue Nostalgia and the Aesthetics of Remediation. In K. Niemeyer (Ed.), Media and Nostalgia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  75. Stein, G. (1924). If I Told Him: A Completed Portrait of Picasso. https://www. poetryfoundation.org/poems/55215/if-i-told-him-a-completed-portrait-of- picasso. Accessed Apr 2020.
  76. Sypher, W. (1968). Literature and Technology: The Alien Vision. New York: Random House.
  77. Tokarczuk, O. (2017). Flights (trans: Croft, J.). London: Fitzcaraldo Editions.
  78. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: or, Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. digital perspectives on the humanities were relegated to parallel activities that run alongside regular course offerings. In many respects, Jerome McGann's challenge from Radiant Textuality has still not been answered- but we are working on it. references
  79. Atari. (1980). Missile Command. Video game. https://my.ign.com/atari/missile- command (accessed, July 2020).
  80. Badger, G. (1989). Material Witness. Anselm Kiefer at Anthony D'Offay (review). http://www.gerrybadger.com/material-witness-anselm-kiefer-at-anthony- doffay/. Accessed Apr 2020.
  81. Birkerts, S. (1994). The Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reading in an Electronic Age. New York: Faber and Faber.
  82. Bolz, N. (1993). Am Ende der Gutenberg-Galaxis: die neuen Kommunikations verhältnisse. München: Fink.
  83. Brill, K. C., & Luongo, K. N. (2012, March 16). Nuclear Terrorism. A Clear Danger. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/16/opinion/ nuclear-terrorism-a-clear-danger.html. Accessed May 2020.
  84. Burdick, A., Drucker, J., et al. (2012). Digital_Humanities. Cambridge, MA/ London: MIT Press.
  85. Butler, S. (2011). The Matter of the Page. Essays in Search of Ancient and Medieval Authors. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
  86. Christensen, I. (1981). Alfabet: digte. København: Gyldendal 1994.
  87. Drucker, J. (2003, April 25). The Virtual Codex from Page Space to E-space. Lecture at the Syracuse University History of the Book Seminar. http://www.philo- biblon.com/drucker/. Accessed May 2020.
  88. Ekbom, T. (1965). Signalspelet: en prosamaskin. Stockholm: Bonnier. Endtime Ministries, Inc. (2020). https://www.endtime.com/about/. Accessed May 2020.
  89. Gyllensten, L. (1979). "Folkpartiet vid vägskälet" ("The Liberal Party at the Crossroads"). In Kilpp i 70-talet: essäer ("Clippings from the 70s: Essays"). Stockholm: Bonnier 2015 (e-pub).
  90. Hansen, M. (2000). Embodying Technesis: Technology Beyond Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  91. Hayles, N. K. (2004). Print Is Flat, Code Is Deep. The Importance of Media- Specific Analysis. Poetics Today, 25, 1.
  92. Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we Became Posthuman. Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  93. Hayles, N. K. (2008). Electronic Literature: New Horizons for the Literary. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame. Headlong: Surviving the Y2K. (2019). Podcast, for Example on. https://www. stitcher.com/podcast/missing-richard-simmons/headlong-surviving-y2k. Accessed May 2020.
  94. Hejlskov Larsen, S. (1971). Systemdigtningen: modernismens tredje fase. København: Munksgaard.
  95. Heldén, J. (2010a). Entropy Edition, (in English and Swedish). http://www.oei. nu/e/entropi_edition.html. Accessed May 2020.
  96. Heldén, J. (2010b). Entropi and Entropi Edition, Poetry Book with CD-ROM. Stockholm: OEI Editör.
  97. Heldén, J., & Jonsson, H. (2014a). Evolution (online work). http://www.tex- tevolution.net. Accessed May 2020.
  98. Heldén, J., & Jonsson, H. (2014b). Evolution. Stockholm: OEI Editör.
  99. Ingvarsson, J. (1994). En heldag i simulatorn -om den aktiva realismen i Torsten Ekboms En galakväll på operan ("A Day in the Simulator -on the Active Realism in Torsten Ekbom's A Night at the Opera"). Gothenburg: Litteraturvetenskapliga institutionen, Göteborgs universitet.
  100. Jockers, M. (2013). Macroanalysis. Digital Methods and Literary History. Urbana/ Chicago/Springfield: University of Illinois Press.
  101. Kiefer, A. (1985-1989). Zweistromsland (The High Priestess). In the Collections of The Astrup Fearnley Museet, Oslo.
  102. Kubrick, S, dir. (1964). Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb. Columbia Pictures.
  103. Lindhé, C. (2014). Evolution = The Action of Reading. In Heldén/Jonsson, Evolution. Stockholm: OEI Editör.
  104. McGann, J. (2001). Radiant Textuality. Literature After the World Wide Web. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  105. Moberg, V. (1959). "Min syn på socialdemokratin" ("My View of Social Democracy"). In Vintergatan, reprinted in I egen sak: obekväma inlägg i det offentliga samtalet ("Speaking for myself: Inconvenient Posts in Public Conversation"). Stockholm: Ordfront 1984.
  106. Moretti, F. (2013). Distant Reading. London/New York: Verso.
  107. Murakami, J. T., dir. (1986). When the Wind Blows. Meltdown Productions (et .al).
  108. Palm, G. (1964). Världen ser dig: Själens furir och andra dikter. Stockholm: Norstedt.
  109. Parikka, J. (2007). Digital Contagions: A Media Archaeology of Computer Viruses. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
  110. Ritasdatter, L. H. (2016). Endless Endtime: A Complete Index of All Elements Leading to the End of the World (Edition #2). Göteborg: Rojal Förlag.
  111. Ritasdatter, L. H. (2018). Bugs in the War Room. Economies and/of Execution. In S. Pritchard & Tyeľik-Carver (Eds.), DATA browser 06: Executing Practices. http://www.data-browser.net/db06.html. Accessed May 2020.
  112. Rushkoff, D. (2009). Terrorism as Virus. http://www.rushkoff.com/terrorism- as-virus/. Accessed May 2020.
  113. Rustad, H. K. (2013). Digital poesi og materialitet. Materiel forgaengelighed i Johannes Heldéns Entropi. Passage 69 ("Digital Poetry and Materiality. Material Perishability in Johannes Heldén's Entropy")
  114. Schlosser, E. (2013). Command and Control: Nuclear Weapons, the Damascus Accident, and the Illusion of Safety. New York: Penguin Press.
  115. UKON [Ulf Karl Olov Nilsson]. (2005). Block. Symposion: Stehag.
  116. War Games. (1983). Directed by John Badham. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.
  117. Zweite, A. (1989). Anselm Kiefer. The High Priestess. New York & London: Anthony D Offay Gallery. reFerences
  118. Agrell, B. (1993). Romanen som forskningsresa, forskningsresan som roman. Om litterära återbruk och konventionskritik i 1960-talets nya svenska prosa (The Novel as an Expedition, The Expedition as a Novel: On Literary Recycling and Convention Criticism in the New Prose of the Swedish 1960s). Göteborg: Daidalos.
  119. Agrell, B. (1997). "Konsten som grepp -formalistiska strategier och emblematiska tankeformer" (Art as Technique -Formalistic Strategies and Emblematic modes of Thought). In Tidskrift för Litteraturvetenskap 1.
  120. Balsamo, A. (2011). Designing Culture: The Technological Imagination at Work. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  121. Birkerts, S. (1994). The Gutenberg Elegies. The Fate of Reading in an Electronic Age. New York: Faber & Faber..
  122. Bolick, R. (2018). On 'The Book'. MIT Press. https://books-on-books.com/ tag/johannes-helden/. Accessed May 2020.
  123. Boot, P. (2013). Mesotext: Digitised Emblems, Modelled Annotations and Humanities Scholarship. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  124. Bruhn, J. (2010). Heteromediality. In L. Elleström (Ed.), Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  125. Codebò, M. (2010). Narrating from the Archive: Novels, Records, and Bureaucrats in the Modern Age. Madison, NJ.
  126. Daly, P. M. (1979). Emblem Theory: Recent German Contributions to the Characterization of the Emblem Genre. Nendeln, Liechtenstein: KTO Press.
  127. Daly, P. M. (1988). Modern Illustrated Advertising and the Renaissance Emblem. In K. J. Höltgen, P. M. Daly, & W. Lottes (Eds.), Word and Visual Imagination: Studies in the Interaction of English Literature and the Visual Arts. Erlangen: Universitätsbund Erlangen-Nürnberg.
  128. Daly, P. M. (1998). Literature in the Light of the Emblem: Structural Parallels Between the Emblem and Literature in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (2nd ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  129. Fleischer, R. (2013). Sökrutan, flödet och humanioras framtid. In T. Forser & T. Karlsohn (Eds.), Till vilken nytta? En bok om humanioras möjligheter (To What Use? A Book on the Possibilities of the Humanities). Göteborg: Daidalos.
  130. Hayles, N. K. (2012). How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
  131. Ingvarsson, J. (2015). "Göra bruk: texter i arbete," (Make Use: Texts at Work), Universitetet som medium (The University as Medium). In M. Lindström & A. Wickberg (Eds.). Stockholm: Kungliga Biblioteket.
  132. Joyce, M. (1995). Of Two Minds: Hypertext Pedagogy and Poetics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  133. Kelty, C. (2016). Participation. In B. Peters (Ed.), Digital Keywords. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  134. Lindhé, C. (2013). 'A Visual Sense Is Born in the Fingertips': Towards a Digital Ekphrasis. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 7, nr 1. https://www.digitalhuman- ities.org/dhq/vol/7/1/000161/000161.html. Accessed May 2020.
  135. Manning, J. (2002). The Emblem. London: Reaktion.
  136. McLuhan, M. (1968). Casting My Perils Before Swains. In G. E. Stearn (Eds.), McLuhan Hot & Cool: A Primer for the Understanding and a Critical Symposium with a Rebuttal by McLuhan. Harmondsworth: Penguin (first ed. 1967).
  137. Mitchell, W. J. T. (1994). Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
  138. Moretti, F. (2013). Distant Reading. London/New York: Verso.
  139. Nelson, T. (1999). Way Out of the Box. http://ted.hyperland.com/TQdox/zifty. d9-TQframer.html. As at May 2020, link is broken, but quotes found here: https://www.openpolitics.com/links/ted-nelson-way-out-of-the-box/
  140. O'Gorman, M. (2006). E-Crit: Digital Media, Critical Theory and the Humanities. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  141. Piper, A. (2018). Enumerations. Data and Literary Study. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
  142. Postman, N. (1979). Teaching as a Conserving Activity. New York: Delacorte Press.
  143. Schottenius Cullhed, S. (2015). Proba the Prophet: Studies in the Christian Virgilian Cento of Faltonia Betitia Proba. Leiden: Brill.
  144. Shklovsky, V. (1991). Art as Device. In Theory of Prose (trans: Sher, B.). London: Dalkey Archive Press.
  145. Snow, C. P. (2013). The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. Eastford: Martino Fine Books (first ed. 1959).
  146. Sypher, W. (1968). Literature and Technology: The Alien Vision. New York: Random House.
  147. Wark, M. (2007). Gamer Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. See https://www.academia.edu/182788/Gamer\_Theory. Accessed July 2020.
  148. Weilenmann, A., & Larsson, C. (2001). Local Use and Sharing of Mobile Phones. In B. Brown & N. Green (Eds.), Wireless World: Social and Interactional Aspects of the Mobile Age. London: Springer Verlag.
  149. Whitson, R., & Whittaker, J. (Eds.). (2012). William Blake and the Digital Humanities: Collaboration, Participation, and Social Media. London: Routledge Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Literature.

Digital Epistemology: An Introduction

Towards a Digital Epistemology

The notion of digital epistemology as applied in this volume could in some of its applications be understood as an attempt to do digital humanities without being committed to digital tools and objects. This, however, is not a programmatic stance, rather a reminder that the epistemological consequences of digitization can be traced also in texts and artwork that are not "about" digital objects; and without using digital tools to perform the analysis. In this introduction, Cecilia Lindhé (Digital Humanities Quarterly, 7(1).

Digital Libraries for Open Knowledge

Springer eBooks, 2018

The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Digital nominalism. Notes on the ethics of information society in view of the ontology of the digital

The commodification of code demands two preconditions: a belief if the existence of code and a system of ownership for the code. An examination of these preconditions is helpful for resisting the further widening of digital divides. The ontological belief in the relatively independent existence of code is dependent on our understanding of what the “digital” is. Here it is claimed that the digital is not a natural kind, but a concept that is relative to our practices of interpretation. An interpretative system that sees code as something that can or should always be owned implies an increase of social control and threatens vital processes of knowledge creation that are necessary for an open and egalitarian information society. The ontological belief in “digital code” thus provides the backdrop for an ethical view of the information society. Consequently, if we see digital code as an interpretative notion (in the nominalist way), the ethical questions appear in a different light.

Digital Humanism

Digital Humanism

of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Regarding these commercial rights a non-exclusive license has been granted to the publisher. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Towards a Digital Fourth Estate

Žurnalistikos tyrimai

A radio producer asked me four years ago about the difference between data and information in the context of presenting Luciano Floridi's scholarly-amazing book, the Fourth Revolution. Although I have answered the question rightfully, I did not realise that data and information govern our lives to the extent that some of us are oblivious to our ignorance. Before that interview, nearly a year ago, particularly in September 2019, I had participated in an academic conference in the German city of Bonne. I had a golden opportunity to explore a new path of human knowledge. A path on how to approach journalism and media studies in the modern world that is the world of digits, the world of Machine Learning (ML), a world of Artificial Intelligence (AI), a world of visible and invisible agents who communicate, and we may not recognise that they communicate and share data. Al Maaref University conducted its first international conference,

Cited by

Trascender Metodológico: Epistemología, Perspectivas Teóricas y Metodológicas de la Investigación Digital

Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0

En la actualidad, versar sobre los métodos de investigación invita a los expertos a dar una mirada trascendente desde los términos epistemológicos, axiológicos, ontológicos y teleológicos dentro de un paradigma tecnológico que impulsa la era digital en todos los ámbitos. El propósito del presente estudio contemplado bajo el método inductivo, del paradigma humanista, con enfoque cualitativo de diseño narrativo de tópico y tipo documental interpretativo; fue comprender la importancia de los métodos de investigación digitales en el desarrollo de la investigación en línea, bajo la técnica de revisión documental. De modo que, la brecha entre el conocimiento técnico e intencionalidad exige un examen crítico de que las tecnologías digitales deben ser principalmente basados en valores humanos. En atención a lo cual, es vital importancia comprender que la digitalización es solo una arista que no puede existir sin contenido. Por ende, se procede al análisis e interpretación epistemológica, de...