Toward Standardization of Trabeculectomy : The EXPRESS Device in Clinical Practice (original) (raw)
This monograph is based on a symposium about the EXPRESS Glaucoma Filtration Device (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX; Figure 1) that was held during the American Glaucoma Society meeting in Dana Point, California, in March of this year. The purpose of the symposium was to feature advances in glaucoma surgery that may benefit glaucoma patients because, ultimately, what is good for our patients is good for us. I feel that the EXPRESS device is one of the more exciting of these advances, because it has the potential to standardize filtration in glaucomatous eyes. The EXPRESS Glaucoma Filtration Device is indicated to reduce IOP in glaucoma patients where medical and conventional surgical treatments have failed. It is my pleasure to work with Marlene Moster, MD, who participated in the device's clinical trials and has excellent data. I think you will find the information presented herein quite interesting and useful for your practice.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Survey of Ophthalmology, 2015
Glaucoma filtration surgery is performed to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients for whom maximal tolerable pharmacologic IOP-lowering therapy and/or laser surgery fail to lower IOP sufficiently and/or fail to prevent optic nerve damage or visual field deterioration. For decades, the most widely utilized procedure for glaucoma filtration surgery has been trabeculectomy. Although this approach reliably provides long-term IOP reduction in many patients, the postoperative complication rate is high. This has driven the development of alternative approaches to reduce IOP surgically. The EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device was developed to mimic IOP control by trabeculectomy and to have a better safety profile. This non-valved, medical-grade stainless steel device diverts aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to an intrascleral space. Despite the widespread use of the EX-PRESS device, only a few studies compare its efficacy and safety with that of trabeculectomy. We analyze available data regarding the safety and efficacy of the EX-PRESS device, particularly in comparison with trabeculectomy.
Advances in the Surgical Management of Glaucoma—The Role of the EX-PRESS® Glaucoma Filtration Device
US Ophthalmic Review, 2012
By reducing intraocular pressure (IOP), we aim to arrest the glaucomatous process. Our strategies include medical, laser, and surgical techniques. Trabeculectomy is the gold standard drainage surgery to achieve this; as there can be a high degree of variability in the procedure and its success depends on bleb creation, with the challenges of wound healing modulation, results remain unpredictable. Several devices are being assessed to try to achieve ‘minimally invasive glaucoma surgery’. While results will take some years to evaluate rigorously, it seems IOP levels by these means lie in the mid-teens. These minimally invasive glaucoma surgery techniques therefore would appear to be destined for patients whose glaucomatous damage is relatively mild to moderate and whose target IOPs fall into this range. To simultaneously achieve lower IOPs for patients with more advanced visual loss, efforts have been made to ‘fine-tune’ trabeculectomy. Use of the EX-PRESS® Glaucoma Filtration Device ...
Evaluation of ExPress glaucoma filtration device in Indian patients with advanced glaucoma
Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2015
ExPress glaucoma filtration device (GFD) has recently become available in India as a surgical option for glaucoma patients. We retrospectively evaluated the outcome of ExPress GFD in 12 eyes with advanced glaucoma with intraocular pressures (IOPs) not controlled on maximal tolerable medical therapy. The mean preoperative IOP of 29.58 ± 7.13 mmHg decreased to 17.0 ± 2.67 and 17.40 ± 0.89 mmHg at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Absolute success (IOP ≤ 18 mmHg, with no additional glaucoma medications) was achieved in eight cases (66.7%) and qualified success (IOP ≤ 18 mmHg, with additional glaucoma medications) in two cases (16.7%) at 1-year after surgery. Early intervention was needed in 4 patients; two underwent anterior chamber reformation while the other two required needling. Two patients required resurgery. There was no significant change in the best corrected visual acuity postoperatively (P = 0.37). ExPress GFD does not seem to offer a benefit over standard trabeculectomy in pat...
Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) Is a Poor Substitute for Trabeculectomy"—The Great Debate
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Surgical treatment for glaucoma has undergone a dramatic change over the last decade. Trabeculectomy has been the main surgical procedure worldwide for almost 50 years. However, there is a growth in development of new novel devices and surgical techniques designed to lower intraocular pressure in a less invasive fashion. The term minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has been coined and is the subject of investment, debate and, increasingly, research. The position of MIGS in the glaucoma treatment paradigm is yet to be clearly defined and its ability to replace conventional filtration surgery remains debatable. In this paper two glaucoma specialists were invited to debate the motion that ''MIGS is a poor substitute for trabeculectomy''.
Clinical results with the Trabectome, a novel surgical device for treatment of open-angle glaucoma
Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, 2006
To describe treatment outcomes after Trabectome surgery in an initial series of 101 patients with open-angle glaucoma. A 19-gauge microelectrosurgical device enabled ab interno removal of a strip of trabecular meshwork and inner wall of Schlemm's canal under gonioscopic control with continual infusion and foot-pedal control of aspiration and electrosurgery. A smooth, pointed ceramic-coated insulating footplate was inserted into Schlemm's canal to act as a guide within the canal and to protect adjacent structures from mechanical or heat injury during ablation of a 30- to 90-degree arc of angle tissue. Mean preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) in the initial 101 patients was 27.6 +/- 7.2 mm Hg. Thirty months postoperatively, mean IOP was 16.3 +/- 3.3 mm Hg (n = 11). The mean percentage drop over the whole course of follow-up was 40%. At all times postoperatively, the absolute and percent decrease in IOP from preoperative levels were statistically significant (paired t test,...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.