A Practical Approach for Linearity Assessment of Calibration Curves Under the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) Guidelines for an In-House Validation of Method of Analysis (original) (raw)
Related papers
Calibration and Validation of Analytical Methods - A Sampling of Current Approaches, 2018
Calibration curve is a regression model used to predict the unknown concentrations of analytes of interest based on the response of the instrument to the known standards. Some statistical analyses are required to choose the best model fitting to the experimental data and also evaluate the linearity and homoscedasticity of the calibration curve. Using an internal standard corrects for the loss of analyte during sample preparation and analysis provided that it is selected appropriately. After the best regression model is selected, the analytical method needs to be validated using quality control (QC) samples prepared and stored in the same temperature as intended for the study samples. Most of the international guidelines require that the parameters, including linearity, specificity, selectivity, accuracy, precision, lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), matrix effect and stability, be assessed during validation. Despite the highly regulated area, some challenges still exist regarding the validation of some analytical methods including methods when no analyte-free matrix is available.
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2003
Examination of the requirements of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for evaluating the linearity of an analytical method reveals them to be unsatisfactory, in both the definition of linearity and in the specifications for testing this property of an analytical method. A new definition for linearity is proposed, along with a new method for evaluating this property of an analytical method, one that is consistent with the definition. The method is tested by reevaluating the linearity of data collected from a Near-Infrared method of analysis of pharmaceutical preparations.
Validation of analytical methods and laboratory procedures for chemical measurements
Arhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju, 1998
Method validation is a key element in the establishment of reference methods and in the assessment of a laboratory's competence in producing reliable analytical data. Hence, the scope of the term "method validation" is wide, especially if one bears in mind the role of Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC). The paper puts validation in the context of the process generating chemical information, introduces basic performance parameters included in the validation processes, and evaluates current approaches to the problem. Two cases are presented in more detail: the development of European standard for chlorophenols and its validation by a full scale collaborative trial and the intralaboratory validation of a method for ethylenethiourea by using alternative analytical techniques.
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2004
The implementation of quality systems in analytical laboratories has now, in general, been achieved. While this requirement significantly modified the way that the laboratories were run, it has also improved the quality of the results. The key idea is to use analytical procedures which produce results that fulfil the users’ needs and actually help when making decisions. This paper presents the implications of quality systems on the conception and development of an analytical procedure. It introduces the concept of the lifecycle of a method as a model that can be used to organize the selection, development, validation and routine application of a method. It underlines the importance of method validation, and presents a recent approach based on the accuracy profile to illustrate how validation must be fully integrated into the basic design of the method. Thanks to the β-expectation tolerance interval introduced by Mee (Technometrics (1984) 26(3):251–253), it is possible to unambiguously demonstrate the fitness for purpose of a new method. Remembering that it is also a requirement for accredited laboratories to express the measurement uncertainty, the authors show that uncertainty can be easily related to the trueness and precision of the data collected when building the method accuracy profile.
Some practical examples of method validation in the analytical laboratory
TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 1999
Method validation is a key element in both the elaboration of reference methods and the assessment of a laboratory's competence in producing reliable analytical data. Hence, the scope of the term method validation is wide, especially if one bears in mind that there is or at least should be a close relation between validation, calibration and quality control QA /QC. Moreover, validation should include more than the instrumental step only since the whole cycle from sampling to the ¢nal analytical result is important in the assessment of the validity of an analytical result. In this article validation is put in the context of the process of producing chemical information. Two cases are presented in more detail: the development of a European standard for chlorophenols and its validation by a full scale collaborative trial, and the intralaboratory validation of a method for ethylenethiourea using alternative analytical techniques.
Calibration curves are commonly used for quantitative analysis in analytical chemistry to calculate the concentrations of chemicals in samples. Typically, the concentration of the analyte, the chemical being quantified, is the independent variable and is plotted on the x-axis. The detector response, the reading from the instrument, is the dependent variable and is plotted on the y-axis. A calibration curve is made by plotting the known concentration of analyte versus the detector response. After a calibration curve is made, the unknown concentration of analyte in any sample is calculated from its detector response. Unfortunately, there is no standard procedure for objectively testing the fit of calibration curves in analytical chemistry. For example, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) do not provide guidance for testing the linearity or curvature of calibration curves. Moreover, this important topic is not broached in at least 5 of the leading analytical chemistry textbooks. However, there is a simple and effective way to fix this deficiency. In this paper, the use of polynomial regression to objectively test the fit of calibration curves in drinking water analysis is demonstrated. Polynomial regression was used to test the linearity of a representative calibration curve for the spectrophotometric determination of arsenic in drinking water by the arsenomolybdate method. And polynomial regression was used to test the curvature of a representative calibration curve for the determination of arsenic in drinking water by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy. Microsoft® Excel® 2010 and 2016, MiniTab® 17.2.1, and RStudio® 0.99.441 were used to calculate these calibration curves; in all cases, the calibration curves from these 3 programs agreed with each other to at least 3 significant figures.
Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2012
The calibration of an analytical method is a very important part of its development, and only the proper statistical and chemometric evaluation of the results, together with understanding this process, allows good results. The purpose of this minireview is to call the reader's attention to the major problems in calibration: curvilinearity, heteroscedasticity, presence of outliers, transformation of results, and distribution and autocorrelation of residuals. The common misunderstandings and mistakes are emphasized to inform the reader. Additionally, the computational package “quantchem” for GNU R environment, allowing full and automatic calibration evaluation, is presented.
Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1998
The resistance presented by a particular analytical method or procedure to the generation of biased results when subjected Ž to slight modifications in nominal experimental conditions has traditionally been known as ruggedness from an interlabora-. Ž . tory trial or robustness from an intralaboratory study . This paper develops a protocol for a complete study of robustness, using a simple statistical technique which does not require the performance of ANOVA. The method simply consists of the Ž establishing of a standard calibration and the creation of experimental screening designs saturated fractioned or Plackettw Ž .