Leveling the Field: Flipped Instruction as a Tool for Promoting Equity in General Chemistry (original) (raw)

Diversifying Undergraduate Chemistry Course Pathways to Improve Outcomes for At-Risk Students

Journal of Chemical Education, 2020

A lack of preparedness for college-level coursework has been shown to negatively impact student success rates in STEM. Remedial instruction has been the most widespread approach to helping at-risk students attain college-level competencies; however, studies have shown that remediation has had null or negative impacts on degree completion for students placed into these courses. This study examines two decades worth of data from one institution to evaluate the efficacy of course pathway diversification as an alternative model to traditional remediation on general chemistry students' firstand second-semester outcomes. In this approach, students with low mathematics placement exam scores take a separate lecture offering of general chemistry I with a corequisite support course (GCI-S) that is offered in parallel with the mainstream course (GCI-M). The course content across these offerings is the same, and successful students in either course are rejoined in a common general chemistry II course (GCII) in the subsequent semester. Our results indicate that first-semester outcomes for at-risk students have improved markedly since the inception of GCI-S relative to non-at-risk students. However, these improvements are not as apparent in GCII. Additionally, while the achievement gap in first-semester general chemistry outcomes between GCI-S and GCI-M students has improved, corresponding achievement gaps in GCII have worsened. We discuss the implications of our findings in ways that might guide the efforts of others in better supporting our most vulnerable students in chemistry.

Flipped vs. Traditional Classrooms in High School Chemistry: A Case for Emphasizing Quality of Implementation

SITE, 2019

The majority of research on flipped learning has focused on higher education. The purpose of the current study was to compare flipped and traditional approaches to teaching chemistry in secondary school classrooms. Attitudes and learning performance were assessed for 50 grade 11 students (21 male, 29 female) participating in two flipped and two traditional chemistry units over a 12-week period. Students rated learning environment, understanding, and the effectiveness of learning the same for both flipped and traditional teaching approaches. Open-ended comments revealed that students were equally positive about the quality of flipped and traditional teaching approaches. Finally, both flipped and traditional teaching approaches produced significant gains in knowledge and application-based questions. It was concluded that both flipped and traditional approaches to teaching high school chemistry are viable if attention and care are directed toward clear, well-paced explanations, providing a sufficient range of examples, ensuring enough time to apply concepts, and offering support when needed.

Student Experiences and Motivations in a Flipped General Chemistry II Course

2020

Student-centered pedagogies have become increasingly popular in higher education. Research on flipped learning, in particular, has shown that collaborative problem-solving environments are able to better support effective learning than lecture alone. However, the effects of this format on students' interests and motivations in chemistry remain unknown. For this study, students and graduate teaching assistants who participated in a flipped learning, second-semester general chemistry course were selected to participate in a focus group discussion and individual interviews that explored their experiences and perceptions of the features of the course (affordances) that supported and thwarted their sense of motivation.This phenomenographic study mapped eight students' experiences of the course and used qualitative data from interviews with the graduate teaching assistants (TAs) to compare and contrast with students' claims. Self-determination theory was used to frame these ex...

Community College Chemistry Coursetaking and STEM Academic Persistence

Journal of Chemical Education, 2018

Community colleges educate nearly half of all students who complete postsecondary degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. For many matriculated students, chemistry is a required gatekeeping course for postsecondary retention and advancement in STEM majors. This research explored community college student enrollment and performance in introductory chemistry courses for STEM majors, and how chemistry achievement related to student background characteristics and degree persistence. Data included grades, demographics, enrollment patterns, and degree status for 1,690 chemistry students who matriculated at a diverse, suburban community college from 2011 to 2014. Descriptive statistics indicated 32% of students received grades of D, F, or W in introductory chemistry; 49% of these students changed their majors after taking the course, with fourfifths of those degree changers switching to non-STEM fields. Binary logistic regression models revealed that chemistry enrollment was a significant predictor of degree change to non-STEM disciplines, with biology and anatomy/physiology coursetaking predicting STEM persistence. Degree change to non-STEM was predicted by chemistry performance but not by student characteristics including gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. The results indicate that chemistry coursetaking and performance are notable factors affecting student persistence in STEM disciplines, and achievement is largely independent of student background variables. Implications for community college chemistry teaching and STEM academic advisement are discussed.

Investigating Learner Perceptions and Outcomes of the Flipped Classroom in Foundation Chemistry Classes

2018

To compensate for the fast-paced, content-driven nature of the Foundation Chemistry module, which is coupled with wide-ranging learner knowledge and backgrounds, a fully flipped approach was introduced for the topics of qualitative equilibria and quantitative kinetics to assess whether this could improve learners’ understanding and attainment. Statistical analysis of module and exam marks provides some evidence that the fully flipped approach had a positive impact on attainment for the topic of quantitative equilibria, and the learners’ perceptions, as measured through a survey, for this topic confirmed that the flipped model had indeed improved their understanding. However, there is no evidence to suggest any improvement in learner understanding in the more complex topic of quantitative kinetics. After considering both the analysis outcomes and the learner responses to the survey, it is suggested that the flipped methodology be used as part of a mixed methods approach to teaching.

Equity for women and underrepresented minorities in STEM: Graduate experiences and career plans in chemistry

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2021

Recent events prompted scientists in the United States and throughout the world to consider how systematic racism affects the scientific enterprise. This paper provides evidence of inequities related to race–ethnicity and gender in graduate school experiences and career plans of PhD students in the top 100 ranked departments in one science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) discipline, chemistry. Mixed-model regression analyses were used to examine factors that might moderate these differences. The results show that graduate students who identified as a member of a racial/ethnic group traditionally underrepresented in chemistry (underrepresented minorities, URM) were significantly less likely than other students to report that their financial support was sufficient to meet their needs. They were also less likely to report having supportive relationships with peers and postdocs. Women, and especially URM women, were significantly less likely to report supportive relationships ...

Impact of Supplemental Instruction in Entry-Level Chemistry Courses at a Midsized Public University

Journal of Chemical Education, 2011

This paper examines the impact of supplemental instruction (SI)nonremedial workshops that support regularly scheduled courseson four different chemistry courses: General Chemistry I and II, and Organic Chemistry I and II. Differences in how SI impacts student performance in these courses are discussed, particularly in terms of whether students from underrepresented minority groups are affected differently from their peers. We found that SI appears to be most effective in courses at the beginning of the chemistry sequence and least effective in those in which students have already had to demonstrate effectiveness with the material in order to succeed in the course; its impact on performance in General Chemistry I appears to be quite high compared to a negligible impact in Organic Chemistry II. Impacts appear to be due to SI itself rather than the academic fitness of the students who opt to enroll in it. In the four courses examined, SI did not appear to have a different impact on students from underrepresented minority groups than it did on their peers.

A flipped classroom redesign in general chemistry

Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2016

The flipped classroom continues to attract significant attention in higher education. Building upon our recent parallel controlled study of the flipped classroom in a second-term general chemistry course (J. Chem. Educ., 2016, 93, 13–23), here we report on a redesign of the flipped course aimed at scaling up total enrollment while keeping discussion sizes small (i.e., <30 students), and maintaining equivalent contact hour load for faculty and workload for students. To that end, the course format featured lecture contact pushed outside of the classroom in the form of video lectures (mean duration 13 minutes) paired with online homework sets, and three parallel weekly one-hour discussion sections were held in adjoining lab rooms immediately prior to the three-hour laboratory session. As in our previous design, the discussion sections were led by teaching assistants; however, the weekly discussion meeting was shortened from 75 minutes to 50 minutes, and the primary instructor “float...