In the Shadow of Judicial Supremacy: Putting the Idea of Judicial Dialogue in Its Place (original) (raw)

Dialogue Theory, Judicial Review, and Judicial Supremacy: A Comment on 'Charter Dialogue Revisited'”(2007)

Carissima Mathen

Osgoode Hall LJ

View PDFchevron_right

THE POLITICS OF JUDICIAL DIALOGUE

David S Law

View PDFchevron_right

The legitimacy of judicial review: The limits of dialogue between courts and legislatures

Luc B. Tremblay

International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

The Unfulfilled Potential of the Court and Legislature Dialogue

Grégoire Webber

(2009) 42 Canadian Journal of Political Science 443-465 , 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Dialogue and constitutional duty

Mark Tushnet

Boundaries of State, Boundaries of Rights, 2000

View PDFchevron_right

Judicial Dialogue and Multilevel Protection of Fundamental Rights in Europe

Jizeng Fan

View PDFchevron_right

Between Judicial Review and Legislative Supremacy

Alon Harel, Adam Shinar

View PDFchevron_right

Rights, ‘Dialogue’ and Democratic Objections to Judicial Review

Leighton McDonald

Federal Law Review

View PDFchevron_right

Dialogic constitutionalism and judicial review

Seyla Benhabib

Global Constitutionalism

View PDFchevron_right

Bringing the Outside inside: Macro and Micro Factors to Put the Dialogue among Highest Courts into its Right Context

Carlo Guarnieri

Utrecht Law Review, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

The Judiciary in Public Debates

Rónán Kennedy

Irish Law Times, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

(eds.) Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions

Grégoire Webber

View PDFchevron_right

The Court of Justice's Participation in the Judicial Discourse: Theory and Practice

Christina Eckes

View PDFchevron_right

New challenges for constitutional adjudication in Europe: What role could the ‘dialogue of courts’ play?

Tania Groppi

2018

View PDFchevron_right

The Dialogue of the Constitutional Court with the Ordinary Courts: The Developments in Thirty Years

Airė Keturakienė

View PDFchevron_right

Conceptual Precision and Parliamentary Rights Review: Disambiguating 'Dialogue'

Emmett Macfarlane

View PDFchevron_right

Pushing the boundaries of deliberative constitutionalism. From judicial dialogue to inclusive dialogue

C Ignacio Giuffré

Revus. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law, 2023

View PDFchevron_right

Dialogue, Finality and Legality

Jeff King

Constitutional Dialogue

View PDFchevron_right

Constitutional and Common Law Dialogues between the Supreme Court and Canadian Legislatures

Kent Roach

2001

View PDFchevron_right

The Judiciary in Political Debates: The Sound of Silence?

Rónán Kennedy

2011

View PDFchevron_right

Comparative Judicial Politics

Frances Rosenbluth

View PDFchevron_right

The Hidden Dialogue: When Judicial Competitors Collaborate

filippo fontanelli

Giuseppe Martinico, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Judiciary-Elected Branch Power Relations and the Search for Truth (article)

Cristina Parau

View PDFchevron_right

Conceptual Precision and Parliamentary Systems of Rights: Disambiguating “Dialogue”

Emmett Macfarlane

Revue d'études constitutionnelles, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

The Relevance of the Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint Discourse

Ariel Bendor

Tulsa Law Review, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Jurisdiction and Pluralism. The Temptation of a Reflective Judiciary

mia caielli

2018

View PDFchevron_right

Judicial Review of Parliamentary Rulemaking: A Provisional Case for Restraint

Firoz Cachalia

2016

View PDFchevron_right

In the Region of Middle Axioms: Judicial Dialogue as Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Mid-level Principles

José Juan Moreso

Law and Philosophy, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Unavoidable Judicial Power and Inevitable Charter Controversy

Bruce Ryder

Supreme Court Law Review, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Judges and Policy Making Authority in the United States and the European Union

Antonis Kouroutakis

View PDFchevron_right

Supreme Courts and Judicial Law Making: Constitutional Tribunals and Constitutional Review. By Edward McWhinney [Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 1986, xvi + 305 pp., incl. index, hardbound]

Claude Klein

Israel Law Review, 1987

View PDFchevron_right

Overcoming Judicial Supremacy through Constitutional Amendment: Some Critical Reflections

Mariano C. Melero

Ratio Juris , 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Judicial Review of “Internal Parliamentary Proceedings” The Dialogic and Non-dialogic Approaches

M Jashim Ali Chowdhury

Comparative Constitutional Law and Administrative Law Journal Vol 6 No 1, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Proceduralism and the Epistemic Dilemma of Supreme Courts

Daniele Santoro, Federica Liveriero

View PDFchevron_right

Judicial review and the defence of (democratic) constitutionality: a critique of the argument from disagreement

Lars Vinx

2011

View PDFchevron_right