Reanimation of elbow extension with intercostal nerves transfers in total brachial plexus palsies (original) (raw)
Related papers
2007
Restoration of elbow flexion is the first goal in brachial plexus injuries. The current procedures using nerve grafts and nerve transfers authorize more extensive repairs, with different possible targets: shoulder, elbow extension, and hand. Elbow extension is important to stabilize the elbow without the contralateral hand and allows achieving a useful grasp. The transfer of the intercostal nerves to the nerve of the long head of the triceps may restore this function in brachial plexus palsies. Furthermore, in case of C5 to C7 palsy, this transfer spares the radial nerve and gives a chance to spontaneous triceps recovery by the reinnervation from C8 root. Moreover, in case of absence or insufficient (M0 to M2 according to Medical Research Council scoring) recovery of elbow flexion strength by nerve surgery, the reinnervated triceps can be transferred. We present the technique of intercostal nerve transfer to the long head of the triceps branch to restore elbow extension in brachial plexus palsy. Results concerning 10 patients are presented.
Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia: Brazilian Neurosurgery
Objective To present the functional outcomes of distal nerve transfer techniques for restoration of elbow flexion after upper brachial plexus injury. Method The files of 78 adult patients with C5, C6, ± C7 lesions were reviewed. The attempt to restore elbow flexion was made by intraplexus distal nerve transfers using a fascicle of the ulnar nerve (group A, n = 43), or a fascicle of the median nerve (group B, n = 16) or a combination of both (group C, n = 19). The result of the treatment was defined based on the British Medical Research Council grading system: muscle strength < M3 was considered a poor result. Results The global incidence of good/excellent results with these nerve transfers was 80.7%, and for different surgical techniques (groups A, B, C), it was 86%, 56.2% and 100% respectively. Patients submitted to ulnar nerve transfer or double transfer (ulnar + median fascicles transfer) had a better outcome than those submitted to median nerve transfer alone (p < 0.05). T...
Journal of Neurosurgery, 2013
Object Recent advancements in operative treatment of the brachial plexus authorized more extensive repairs and, currently, elbow extension can be included in the rank of desirable functions to be restored. This study aims to describe the author's experience in using the medial pectoral nerve for reinnervation of the triceps brachii in patients sustaining C5–7 palsies of the brachial plexus. Methods This is a retrospective study of the outcomes regarding recovery of elbow extension in 12 patients who underwent transfer of the medial pectoral nerve to the radial nerve or to the branch of the long head of the triceps. Results The radial nerve was targeted in 3 patients, and the branch to the long head of the triceps was targeted in 9. Grafts were used in 6 patients. Outcomes assessed as Medical Research Council Grades M4 and M3 for elbow extension were noted in 7 (58%) and 5 (42%) patients, respectively. Conclusions The medial pectoral nerve is a reliable donor for elbow extension ...
Injury, 2019
Elbow flexion is the first goal in upper partial brachial plexus palsy treatment. However, elbow extension is essential for daily living activities. To recover this function, one fascicle of ulnar nerve can be transferred to the branch of the long head of the triceps, but this procedure has been previously published in only two patients. The goal of our study is to assess a larger series of transfers of one fascicle of ulnar nerve to the branch of the long head of the triceps to help patients recover elbow extension. Ten male patients with C5, C6 and C7 brachial plexus injuries underwent operation. For shoulder recovery, we transferred the spinal accessory nerve and rhomboid nerve. For elbow flexion, one fascicle of median nerve was transferred to the nerve of the biceps. For elbow extension, we transferred one fascicle of ulnar nerve to the branch of the long head of the triceps. Tendon transfers were performed for wrist and finger extension. Nine patients recovered M4 elbow flexion and extension. One patient had M3 elbow extension and flexion. Average active shoulder elevation was 85 °and average active shoulder external rotation was 65 °All patients recovered finger and wrist extension. The classical techniques of grafts or phrenic or intercostal nerve transfers to recover elbow extension are not always reliable, according to the literature. Because the harvested ulnar nerve motor fascicle is close to the branch of the long head of the triceps, the recovery time for this procedure is shorter than that of other described nerve transfers. The isolated recovery of the reinnervated long head of the triceps muscle excludes spontaneous recovery occasionally noted in upper root plexus injuries. The transfer of one fascicle of ulnar nerve to the branch of the long head of the triceps is reliable for active elbow extension recovery in C5, C6 and C7 brachial plexus palsies.
Microsurgery, 2019
Posttraumatic brachial plexus (BP) palsy was used to be treated by reconstruction with nerve grafts. For the last two decades, nerve transfers have gained popularity and believed to be more effective than nerve grafting. The aim of this systematic review was to compare elbow flexion restoration with nerve transfers or nerve grafting after traumatic BP injury. Methods: PRISMA-IPD structure was used for 52 studies included. Patients were allocated as C5-C6 (n = 285), C5-C6-C7 (n = 150), and total BP injury (n = 245) groups. In each group, two treatment modalities were compared, and effects of age and preoperative interval were analyzed. Results: In C5-C6 injuries, 93.1% of nerve transfer patients achieved elbow flexion force ≥M3, which was significantly better when compared to 69.2% of nerve graft patients (p < 0.001). For improved outcomes of nerve transfer patients, shorter preoperative interval was a significant factor in all injury patterns (p < 0.001 for C5-C6 injuries and total BP injuries, p = 0.018 for C5-C6-C7 injuries), and young age was a significant factor in total BP injury pattern (p = 0.022). Conclusions: Our analyses showed that nerve transfers appear superior to nerve graftings especially in patients with a C5-C6 injury. Unnecessary delays in surgery must be prevented, and younger patients may have more chance for better recovery.
Nerve Transfers for Restoring Elbow Flexion in Brachial Plexus Palsy
Brachial Plexus Injury [Working Title], 2021
Nerve transfers (NT) consist in sectioning a donor nerve and connecting it to the distal stump of a recipient unrepairable nerve. For elbow flexion restoration in brachial plexus palsy (BPP) we used different NT: 1) GF motor Ulnar Nerve to Biceps nerve (Oberlin technique), 2) Double fascicular median/ulnar to biceps/brachialis nerve transfer (Mackinnon), 3) InterCostal Nerves (ICN) to MCN (+/− nerve graft), 4) Medial Pectoral Nerve (MPN) to MCN, 5) ThoracoDorsal Nerve (TDN) to MCN, 6) Spinal Accessory Nerve (SAN) to MCN transfer, 7) Phrenic Nerve (PhN) to MCN, 8) Cervical Plexus C3-C4 to MCN and 9) Contralateral C7 (CC7). I want to present my personal experience using the phrenic nerve (PhN), the intercostal nerves (ICN) and Oberlin’s technique. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the results of this procedure in BPP. NT is an important goal in BPP. ICN transfer into the nerve of biceps for elbow flexion recovery is a reliable procedure in BPP. ICN transfer for tricep...
Nerve Transfers for Restoration of Elbow Flexion following Adult Brachial Plexus Injury
2017
Restoration of elbow flexion is a fundamental functional requirement following adult brachial plexus injury. Nerve transfer offers advantages over grafting and has shown better motor recovery. Contemporary literature regarding elbow flexion reconstruction is reviewed and compared. Intraplexal expendable nerve donors for C5, C6, C7 injuries allow nerve regeneration closer to the end organ and hence improved outcomes. A strategic approach using intraplexal donors for elbow restoration allows reservation of extraplexal donors for transfer to reconstruct shoulder function.
Techniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery, 2007
In C5, C6, or C5-to-C7 root injuries, many surgical procedures have been proposed to restore active elbow flexion. Nerve grafts or nerve transfers are the main techniques being carried out. The transfer of ulnar nerve fascicles to the biceps branch of the musculocutaneous nerve is currently proposed to restore active elbow flexion. Recovery of biceps muscle function is generally sufficient to obtain elbow flexion. However, the strength of elbow flexion is sometimes weak because the brachialis muscle is not reinnervated. Therefore, the transfer of 1 fascicle of the median nerve to the brachialis branch of the musculocutaneous nerve may be proposed to improve strength of the elbow flexion. We describe the technique of this double transfer to restore elbow flexion. The results concerning 5 patients are presented.
Nerve Transfer to the Triceps After Brachial Plexus Injury: Report of Four Cases
The Journal of Hand Surgery, 2011
These case reports review the clinical outcomes of 4 patients who underwent nerve transfer to a triceps motor branch of the radial nerve. Mean follow-up was 26 Ϯ 15 months. Two patients had a transfer using an ulnar nerve fascicle to the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle, yielding a motor recovery of grade M5 elbow extension strength in one case and M4ϩ in the other. In 1 patient, a thoracodorsal nerve branch was used as the donor; this patient recovered M4 strength. One patient had a transfer using a radial nerve fascicle to the extensor carpi radialis longus muscle and recovered M5 strength. These outcomes indicate that expendable fascicles of the ulnar, thoracodorsal, and radial nerves are viable donors in the surgical reconstruction of elbow extension.
Motor nerve transfers for restoration of upper arm function in adult brachial plexus injuries
2022
Introduction: Nerve transfers are the only surgical option for reconstruction of directly irreparable injuries of the brachial plexus. In the recent years, there has been a trend toward the increased use of nerve transfers, with the introduction of new methods and novel indications. Patients with total brachial plexus palsy generally have poor outcomes due to the limited number of donor nerves. On the contrary, patients with partial injuries involving the C5, C6, and sometimes C7 spinal nerves have favorable outcomes in a large majority of cases. In both situations, restoration of elbow flexion and shoulder functions are the main priorities. The purpose of this review article to characterize the advantages, problems and controversies of nerve transfers. Methods: PubMed/Medline database was searched for English-language original research and series of adult patients who received nerve transfers for functional restoration of the upper arm, performed within one year after injury and with minimum follow-up of one year. Literature search for outcome analysis was limited to articles published after 1990, amounting to 45 systematic reviews / meta-analyses of the most common nerve transfers (intercostal, spinal accessory, fascicular, and collateral branches of the brachial plexus). Analysis of clinical outcomes was based on Medical Research Council (MRC) grading system for muscle strength, and grades M3 or more were considered as useful functional recovery. Results: A total of 70 articles were included. Generally, intraplexal nerve transfers resulted in a higher rate and better quality of recovery compared to extraspinal transfers. Grades M3 or higher were obtained in 72% of the intercostal and 73% of the spinal accessory nerve transfers for restoration of elbow flexion, and in 56% vs. 98% of transfers for restoration of shoulder function. Among intraplexal nerve transfers, elbow flexion was restored in 84% to 91% of the medial pectoral, 100% of the thoracodorsal, and 94% to 100% of the single or double fascicular nerve transfers. Shoulder function was restored in 81,8% of the medial pectoral, 86% to 93% of the thoracodorsal, and 100% of the triceps branch nerve transfers. Dual nerve transfer (simultaneous reinnervation of the suprascapular and axillary nerves), resulted in 100% rate of recovery. Conclusion: Double fascicular transfer for restoration of elbow flexion and dual nerve transfer for restoration of shoulder function resulted in the most favorable results relative to other transfers, especially regarding quality of recovery. Medial pectoral and thoracodorsal nerve transfers were reasonable alternatives for restoration of both functions.