ICT As Generators of a New Paradigm In Architecture–Humanism and Scale (original) (raw)
Related papers
Conference Proceedings. Paradox to Paradigm. Architecture in the Age of Network Society, 2018
Technology advances as 'progress' and efficacy, while danger builds. This danger is conflict in humanity and conflict with nature. This is proposed as similar to architectural value in conflict with the technicist value proxy to question the profession. Network Society as information technology in the space of communication, forming virtual spaces that transform social space is exemplary of this conflict. Architects define the space of Network Society's emerging social order. This emergence is another opportunity to understand the need for and to 'turn' the profession to its original paradigm. Architecture appears as paradox in Machine Ages and its Network Society. It's original superordinate programme is in conflict with its means. Human consciousness has a role that architecture supports. This paper outlines the parameters for the inevitable transition that reveals this role as the conflict in practice turned to means to reveal and become that original paradigm.
" A technological revolution of historic proportions is transforming the fundamental dimensions of human life: time and space. New scientific discoveries and industrial innovations are extending the productive capacity of working hours while superseding spatial distance in the realms of social activity. The unfolding promise of information technology opens up unlimited horizons of creativity and communication, inviting us to the exploration of new domains of experience, from our inner selves to the outer universe, challenging our societies to engage in a process of structural change " As described above by Castells (1999), information technologies are the most important factor that is transforming our current world and shaping our future in relation to the economy, social and cultural life, education, arts, city, nature and so on. Digital technologies are the impulse of what we call information technology today. As a simple definition; digital technologies are about digitalization of the inputs as codes of the binary system and the digital-ized outputs are the abstractions of the real inputs. However, in addition to that scientific definition, digital technologies have created a new social and cultural phenomenon as every technological advance does. The transformation process is continuous and never ending, also the transformations are occurring too fast. The impact of the information technology is very speed and visual, more perceptible than every precedent technology. This is one of the main reasons why it is crucial at every aspect of our lives. " At no period in human culture have men understood the psychic mechanism involved in the invention and technology. Today is the instant speed of electric information that, for the first time permits easy recognition of the patterns and the formal contours of change and development. (McLuhan, 1964) We must first of all understand and behave with respect to the reality that the changes are not only technological and scientific but they are also effective on cultural and social levels. Myron Krueger who is one of the pioneers of Virtual Reality Technology , have mentioned this approach in 1977 ((Rheingold, 1992); " We are incredibly attuned to the idea that the sole purpose of our technology is to solve problems. It also creates concepts and philosophy. We must more fully explore these aspects of our inventions, because the next generation of technology will speak to us, understand us and perceive our behavior. It will enter every home and office and intercede between us and much of the information and experience we receive. The design of such intimate technology is an aesthetic issue as much as an engineering one. " Then, to be able to profit from the advantages of the digital technologies and not being amazed by them unconsciously, we should before all else realize that digital technologies are bringing important and major changes to the society by creating a new kind of organizational structure and an immersive environment of communication all over the world at ABSTRACT: After defining the new state of being and its impacts on architecture, the subject will be studied more specifically, in relation to the architecture. First, the information space concept will be defined. Then, the impacts of the information space will be described as transformations occurring on the structural and conceptual levels of architecture. Impacts of the information space on the city, building and working environment of the architect are transformations occurring on the structural level. New emergent concepts that will be mentioned and discussed are transformations occurring on conceptual level. More; the educational approaches of some universities on " design computing " will be mentioned and Istanbul Technical University " Architectural Design Computing Program " will be introduced. Some creative examples and new interesting approaches on the educational level will also be included. Finally; the new role of the architect and the role of the architectural education in the " information era " will be defined.
Envisioning an Urban Space That Integrates Architecture into an Information Oriented Society
There is an assumption that architecture can provide an evocative vision of an artificial environment using digitized and wireless communication technology. It is a ideal based on perception of virtual space, where distance is minimized through the continual process of breaking barriers in non-visible planes. It is the domain of the mind, in which the object becomes real by individual choice. It is conceived in a plane known as virtual space or cyber space. Marcos Novak describes it as “space created as habitat for our imagination”. What are the new tendencies in Architecture? These are unknown yet. There is an incursion in different areas, it is seen that the scope of architecture includes Transparency, mix media, layering, transarchitecture, and hypersurfaces. It is an expression of high-speed technology in the process of change, pointing to the new frontier of “Space”. My focus is toward the integration
Interaction of Architecture with the Culture of Digital Civilization
Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2022
To this moment, several studies have been conducted on the specifics of the use of digital methods in architecture, however, researchers have yet to evaluate the continuously changing digital formation in architecture and the problems arising in the process of its evolution. The main purpose of this article is to identify and analyze topical issues of digital culture in nonlinear formation. Modern problems of digital shaping arising in the context of digital architecture are analyzed. The concepts of architectural theorists in the field of nonlinear architecture development based on the topic under study are presented. Contradictory aspects of modern design related to the limitations of new technologies and the difficulties of their integration into architectural processes are also presented. The issues of the absence of holism in modern architecture are investigated. In this regard, the problem with lack of integral design approach that would combine existing techniques into a common structure has been analyzed. The aspects of changing the perception of the role of the architect and urban space in the digital age are considered. Identification and analysis of the described problems of introducing digital tools into the structure of architectural shaping is an important step in the further development of the architectural discipline. This is necessary for timely identification of existing difficulties in the design and further evolution of shaping methods.
" AN ERA OF HUMAN-CENTRIC ARCHITECTURE "
In the course of world history, every era is redefined by the chain of movements which always signaled major evolution. These movements have created a new intellectual, cultural, philosophical and revolutionary shift in the development of architectural thinking too. Architectural thinking is one of the powerful tool which leads to the systematic transformation of mental representation of knowledge to imagine actual or possible states of the physical world. It can be a kind of foresight, a way of seeing the possible future, often in service of creating place. It was the beginning of the 20 th century which brought a radical shift in architectural thinking with the rise of industrialization. The industrial revolution became the celebration of an era that brought extraordinary technological progress and benefit to humankind which was far more forceful than imagined. The notion of beauty was theorized as industrial culture having a clear new sense of form and the new practice as a removal of ornamentation. Machine aesthetic took away the aesthetic of art and crafts which belong to human creation. So there occurred an ideological shift of art-centric practice like Art Nouveau into technology centric architecture through modernist movement having surface principles like mass production, machinery and immediacy in the 20 th century. Then, the criticism to the modern architecture began in the 1960 (Wikipedia) on the grounds that it lacked a sense of place, feeling, meaning and connection to the people. As a reaction, the new ideology like phenomenology, Marxism, pragmatism, people participation, etc. got emerged which lead to human-centric approach. So in this early 21 st century the human-centric ideology is trying to create striking footprint as a new movement in architectural thinking which addresses the ground level principles as hidden anxieties of society, social problems, social behaviors, struggle and ethnography as the point to start design. Human-centric approach actually has a long intellectual history. The first approach is believed to be the statement by the Greek Philosopher Protagoras as " Man is the measure of all things, of things that are that they are, and of things that are not that they are not. " (Russell,1959:47) (Krippendorff). The notion of this statement gives us idea that whatever we do everything revolves around human being. So, a Human-centered architectural design is an approach which involves the investigation of all problems, critical analysis of knowledge, iteration of solutions which engages the people as the source of inspiration. Identifying the actual user via interviews, observing the human activities, mapping human patterns and listening to peoples' stories and memories are the main focus in this approach and tends to go back to basic design education, training, and practice with participatory action. Even though, till now technology have largely dominant almost every field while adoption of human-centric approach is slowly taking a leap. So, the understanding is growing to make the most positive impact in user participation by measuring the impact on people, human-centered design is a much more consistent, glorifying means. It was around 1911, Austrian Architect Adolf Loos designed the new office of Goldman and Salatsch in Vienna commonly known as " Looshaus ". It was the beginning of new style which demonstrated a plain façade for the first time and gave a bold rejection of all the historical elements when the art-centric practice was at its extreme height. Just three years before in 1908, his bold idea of ornamentation as a crime was published in an article called " Ornament and crime ". His writing evoked the prevailing practice as old fashioned and not fit to the time and also act as the significant marker for the evolution of new ideas for the major changes especially in the field of art and architecture. It acts as a pioneer framing to define the ideology of modernist movement and machine-centric approach in architecture. Thus, in the early 20 th century, this
The Digital Age & Architecture
The Digital Age & Architecture: An Exploratory Essay I was young when computers started to remodel the world; I remember my mom yelling at me to turn the internet off so she could answer the phone. At that time, I had no idea that a new Digital Paradigm Change was underway, revolutionizing how the world operated. This paradigm change is the biggest since the Industrial Revolution, with digital technologies making advancements all over the world. As part of the Millennial Generation, I grew up with computers, making it hard to think what the world was like before such technology. Learning from a young, I started my Architecture Degree with an astute aptitude in digital technologies.
Recharting The Philosophy of Technology in Contemporary Architecture
SHS Web of Conferences, 2018
Technology is an indispensable aspect of architecture. In fact, it is being an essential part of the human effort in making architecture. Since the early modern era, technology that rapidly change has been seen as the sign of progress, not only pertaining to the technology itself, but also architecture and even civilization. Modern architectural theoreticians, from Sant'Elia to Le Corbusier, enthusiastically embraced the progressive side of technology and engineering. Philosophically, however, modern technology is regarded pessimistically. Heidegger and Jaspers considered technology as the source of alienation to the human being themselves and to the reality they face. To overcome this gap, Alan Drengson, proposed the four philosophy of technology to rechart the variety of tendency towards technology in Western society, consisting of (1) technological anarchy, (2) technophilia, (3) technophobia, and (4) technological appropriateness. In this explanation, he coined the terms "creative philosophy" to include many aspects and ways of thinking which might be incorporated in the creative activities like architectural design. This paper attempts to evaluate the appropriatenes of Drengson's philosophical scheme as a platform for architectural education in Indonesia in general, by relating his framework with the architectural theories and practices in Indonesia. The result of this effort is while the formulation of his scheme is the very inclusive and closely related with creative activity like architectural design, it contains bias of industrial technology appearing in the Asian scene brought by Western European colonials. Discussing philosophy underlying Gandhi's movement in India to reject oppressive technology, we may arrive at the conclusion that the philosopy of non-violence, truth and justice based on the principle of self restrained are relevant to figure out the ideal of appropriate technology in Asia.
Architectural Objectiles – Architecture, form, meaning and experience in the digital era
2007
The ongoing change of technological paradigm has great consequences for the production of architecture. We are moving from the mechanical to the digital, and also from “mass-production” to “mass-customisation”. New technology make long series of identical elements obsolete, industrially produced components can be unique, optimal in the construction. Other possibilities for different architectural expressions open, and for the tectonic aspects of architecture. Digitally governed production could foster new modes of meaning creation. New conceptions and definitions of objects are emerging with parametric design. Non-standard production and culture could change our perception to more of an organic extension of human intelligence. This paper discusses, with architectural examples from Kas Oosterhuis and Lars Spuybroek, the consequences of these technological and conceptual changes for architecture. Will the new technological paradigm foster a closer relation to human experience? Are the...
Theorizing Technology in Architecture and Urbanism
2014
What does technique mean for us as architects? And what does technique cause us to do in our way of working? Does technique make us sighted – or does it make us blinded? In his script The Question concerning Technology (1953) Martin Heidegger inquires the essence and the appreciation of technology. According to the Greek word techne, in Heidegger‘s perception technology is a kind of production within the realm of „bringing-forth“ (poiesis), affected by an attitude of thinking and revealing the essence of a work. In contrast to this, nowadays it seems that the meaning of the word technique is used conversely: the one thing that counts is the answer or the solution, but not the question or the true problem. Technology has to deliver. In this manner it defines more and more today’s architecture – visibly or invisibly. So what is architecture today in the sense of technology – and what might it be in the former sense of techne? How can we be able to bring forth an architectural „work of...