Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension (original) (raw)
Related papers
JAMA Neurology
; for the RESCUEicp Trial Collaborators IMPORTANCE Trials often assess primary outcomes of traumatic brain injury at 6 months. Longer-term data are needed to assess outcomes for patients receiving surgical vs medical treatment for traumatic intracranial hypertension. OBJECTIVE To evaluate 24-month outcomes for patients with traumatic intracranial hypertension treated with decompressive craniectomy or standard medical care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prespecified secondary analysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Surgery With Craniectomy for Uncontrollable Elevation of Intracranial Pressure (RESCUEicp) randomized clinical trial data was performed for patients with traumatic intracranial hypertension (>25 mm Hg) from 52 centers in 20 countries. Enrollment occurred between January 2004 and March 2014. Data were analyzed between 2018 and 2021. Eligibility criteria were age 10 to 65 years, traumatic brain injury (confirmed via computed tomography), intracranial pressure monitoring, and sustained and refractory elevated intracranial pressure for 1 to 12 hours despite pressure-controlling measures. Exclusion criteria were bilateral fixed and dilated pupils, bleeding diathesis, or unsurvivable injury. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive a decompressive craniectomy with standard care (surgical group) or to ongoing medical treatment with the option to add barbiturate infusion (medical group). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was measured with the 8-point Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (1 indicates death and 8 denotes upper good recovery), and the 6-to 24-month outcome trajectory was examined. RESULTS This study enrolled 408 patients: 206 in the surgical group and 202 in the medical group. The mean (SD) age was 32.3 (13.2) and 34.8 (13.7) years, respectively, and the study population was predominantly male (165 [81.7%] and 156 [80.0%], respectively). At 24 months, patients in the surgical group had reduced mortality (61 [33.5%] vs 94 [54.0%]; absolute difference, −20.5 [95% CI, −30.8 to −10.2]) and higher rates of vegetative state (absolute difference, 4.3 [95% CI, 0.0 to 8.6]), lower or upper moderate disability (4.7 [−0.9 to 10.3] vs 2.8 [−4.2 to 9.8]), and lower or upper severe disability (2.2 [−5.4 to 9.8] vs 6.5 [1.8 to 11.2]; χ 2 7 = 24.20, P = .001). For every 100 individualstreatedsurgically,21additionalpatientssurvivedat24months;4wereinavegetativestate, 2 had lower and 7 had upper severe disability, and 5 had lower and 3 had upper moderate disability, respectively. Rates of lower and upper good recovery were similar for the surgical and medical groups (20 [11.0%] vs 19 [10.9%]), and significant differences in net improvement (Ն1 grade) were observed between 6 and 24 months (55 [30.0%] vs 25 [14.0%]; χ 2 2 = 13.27, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE At 24 months, patients with surgically treated posttraumatic refractory intracranial hypertension had a sustained reduction in mortality and higher rates of vegetative state, severe disability, and moderate disability. Patients in the surgical group were more likely to improve over time vs patients in the medical group.
Long term outcome in survivors of decompressive craniectomy following severe traumatic brain injury
Asian Journal of Neurosurgery, 2019
Background: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is done for the management of intracranial hypertension due to severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI). Despite DC, a number of patients die and others suffer from severe neurological disability. We conducted this observational study to assess functional outcome as measured by Glasgow outcome scale-extended (GOSE) in survivors of DC. The correlation between various factors at admission and hospital with functional outcome was also obtained. Materials and Methods: Patients (15–65 years) posted for cranioplasty following DC due to sTBI were prospectively enrolled. Demographic profile, clinical data, and GOSE were noted at the time of admission for cranioplasty from the patient or nearest relative or both. Retrospective data noted from hospital records included admission Marshalls grading, Glasgow coma score (GCS), motor response, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and timing of DC at the time of initial admission following sTBI. Results: A total of 8...
Journal of Trauma Management & Outcomes, 2012
The choice of optimal treatment in traumatic brain injured (TBI) patients is a challenge. The aim of this study was to verify the neurological outcome of severe TBI patients treated with decompressive craniectomy (early < 24 h, late > 24 h), compared to conservative treatment, in hospital and after 6-months. Methods: A total of 186 TBI patients admitted to the ICU of the Emergency Department of a tertiary referral center (Careggi Teaching Hospital, Florence, Italy) from 2005 through 2009 were retrospectively studied. Patients treated with decompressive craniectomy were divided into 2 groups: "early craniectomy group" (patients who underwent to craniectomy within the first 24 hours); and "late craniectomy group" (patients who underwent to craniectomy later than the first 24 hours). As a control group, patients whose intracranial hypertension was successfully controlled by medical treatment were included in the "no craniectomy group".
Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension in Children
Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement, 2021
OBJECTIVES Decompressive craniectomy (DC) for control of refractory intracranial pressure (ICP) elevations remains a controversial procedure because of its invasiveness and lack of clearly defined indications, the absence of an established surgical technique, the variability of its outcomes, and the significant risk of complications. AIM The purpose of this study was to identify factors for unfavorable outcomes after DC in children with a severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS A longitudinal investigation of correlations was carried out in 64 children (mean age ± 4.8 years) with severe TBI and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 6 ± 2 on admission. The follow-up period was 6 months. RESULTS There was good recovery (with a Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score of 4-5) in 45.3% of cases, severe disability in 31.0% of cases (with a GOS score of 3); and a GOS score of 1-2 in 23.4% of cases. Twelve patients (18.7%) died. Unfavorable prognostic signs were a GCS score < 5 (P = 0.0003)...
The Scientific World Journal, 2014
Background. Decompressive craniectomy can be proposed in the management of severe traumatic brain injury. Current studies report mixed results, preventing any clear conclusions on the place of decompressive craniectomy in traumatology. Methods. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the results of all decompressive craniectomies performed between 2005 and 2011 for refractory intracranial hypertension after severe traumatic brain injury. Sixty patients were included. Clinical parameters (Glasgow scale, pupillary examination) and radiological findings (Marshall CT scale) were analysed. Complications, clinical outcome, and early and long-term Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) were evaluated after surgery. Finally, the predictive value of preoperative parameters to guide the clinician's decision to perform craniectomy was studied. Results. Craniectomy was unilateral in 58 cases and the mean bone flap area was 100 cm 2 . Surgical complications were observed in 6.7% of cases. Mean followup was 30 months and a favourable outcome was obtained in 50% of cases. The initial Glasgow Scale was the only statistically significant predictive factor for long-term outcome. Conclusion. Despite the discordant results in the literature, this study demonstrates that decompressive craniectomy is useful for the management of refractory intracranial hypertension after severe traumatic brain injury.
Brain Injury, 2011
Objective: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a controversial therapeutic strategy. The long-term functional recovery and health status in a sample of decompressive craniectomized TBI are reported. Methods: Patients with TBI who underwent DC were retrospectively investigated. Patients with cerebral haemorrhage (CH) and DC were considered as control group. In all survival patients admitted to a neuro-rehabilitation setting, the modified Rankin (mRS), Glasgow Outcome scale (GOS) and Barthel Scales (BS) were administered at admission, discharge, 1 year and follow-up. The quality-of-life was evaluated with the SF-36 questionnaire at follow-up (41.1 AE 16.6 months). Results: Seventy (33 F, 37 M, mean age ¼ 46.8, SD ¼ 18.8) patients were enrolled: 46 (20 F, 26 M) subjects with TBI and 24 (13 F, 11 M) with CH. After surgery, 11 (23.9%) and 10 (41.6%) subjects in the TBI and CH group, respectively, died. The mean Barthel scores were 4.0 (SD ¼ 5.9), 60.9 (SD ¼ 37.5), 63.7 (SD ¼ 35.1) and 67.3 (SD ¼ 38.2) (p < 0.001) and median GOS was 3, 4, 4 and 4 at admission, discharge, 1 year and follow-up, respectively, in TBI patients. Seventeen (36.9%) patients with TBI and four (16.6%) with CH made a full recovery. The SF-36 questionnaire showed significant abnormalities in all domains of health status in both groups. Conclusion: Craniectomized patients with TBI achieved good long-term outcome, although they experienced significant difficulties in health status.
Surgical neurology international, 2017
The role of decompressive craniectomy in treating raised intracranial pressure (ICP) after traumatic brain injuries (TBI) is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the differences in prognosis of patients initially treated by decompressive craniectomy, craniotomy, or conservatively. We conducted a single-center retrospective study on adult blunt TBI patients admitted to a neurosurgical intensive care unit during 2009-2012. Patients were divided into three groups based on their initial treatment - decompressive craniectomy, craniotomy, and conservative. Primary outcome was 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) dichotomized to favorable outcome (independent) and unfavorable outcome (dependent). The association between initial treatment and outcome was assessed using a logistic regression model adjusting for case-mix using known predictors of outcome. Of the 822 included patients, 58 patients were in the craniectomy group, 401 patients in the craniotomy group, and 363 patient...