Technology and Total Mobilization in Weimar-era Tensions (original) (raw)
2020, Totalitarian and 20th Century Sudies
The present article will examine the role of technology in the "mobilization" of society in the 1930s with regard to the intellectual achievements of thinkers from the socalled conservative revolution. The issue of the relationship between technology and the nascent state will be presented using the works of the German writer Ernst Jünger-in particular his most important treatise, Der Arbeiter. Herrschaft und Gestalt. In his descriptions of the observed political and social changes, Jünger diagnosed the birth of a new order that broke down boundaries between the "mechanical" and the "organic," and, above all, shattered the principles of the old liberal order. One of the most important authors of the socalled conservative revolution, he captured the profound changes in a world in which the necessity of forced change, e.g. through technology, did not eliminate the space for human freedom. In other words, his concept of "total mobilization" did not predetermine a totalitarian future, but neither did it exclude it; while the form of the changes was dictated by the Gestalt, the Form of Being, its content remained a matter of human choice. Jünger's considerations will be confronted with those of other authors, such as Walter Benjamin, Werner Sombart or nationalsocialist writers, which describe the emergence of a new form of state and society, as well as the role of technology in this process.
Related papers
Ernst Cassirer on Form and Technology, 2012
When you read the planned fourth volume of Ernst Cassirer's Philosophy of Symbolic Forms (Philosophie der symbolischen Formen IV ((, written around V 1928-29, but only published as the first volume of his Nachlass in 1995), you find an acute diagnosis of the philosophical situation in Germany and indeed the whole of Europe at the time. The main opposition to Cassirer's own position and the broad neo-Kantian tradition to which he belongs is taken to be the Lebensphilosophie, vitalism-here analysed and attacked in its different shapes in Klages, Scheler, Bergson and Heidegger. At the famous Davos confrontation between Cassirer and Heidegger in 1929, this opposition between the tempered rationalism of neo-Kantianism and the decisionist irrationalism of vitalism disguised as phenomenology naturally forms the axis of the discussion: the mature Bildungsbürger Cassirer bases his lecture on his recently developed doc-r trine of 'symbolic forms'-a sweeping generalization of the neo-Kantian emphasis on the philosophy of science to cover also language, myth, the arts and so on-while the young rebel Heidegger places himself on the side of life, with his blending of phenomenology with philosophy of life in his doctrine of the hard destiny of the existence of Dasein which is able to realize this destiny only in certain 'Spitzenaugenblicke' in life. Not long after this meeting, Cassirer expands his doctrine of symbolic forms to cover technology, in his innovative piece about the philosophy of technology presented in the long 1930 essay 'Form und Technik' ('Form and Technology'). Heidegger's mature philosophy of technology, of 'das Gestell' ('the Enframing'), had to wait until after the war-but one of the main influences of that philosophy, Ernst Jünger's book-length essay Der Arbeiter: Herrschaft und Gestalt (t The Worker: Dominion and Gestalt) was also t
Writing as a »Continuation of War by Other Means«: Ernst Jünger in Weimar Germany
2017
, Ernst Jünger wrote to his brother Friedrich Georg: "Wir müssen uns […] bemühen, die literarische Tätigkeit als Kriegsmittel zu betrachten." This project analyzes the result of said activity: viz. text understood as a means of war. That is to say, it does not aim at answering questions regarding Jünger's political stance as it is mostly the case with scholarly literature on the subject matter at hand, but instead, it addresses a lacuna in the relevant scholarship by systematically examining the textual material as a subversive means of action that allows Jünger for the continuation of war. The examination at hand therfore begins with an analysis of Jünger's Kriegstagebuch, in order to fathom the basis on which he will translate, transform, and instrumentalize the "Sprache der Materialschlacht" as a literary means of expression. Subsequently, it turns to the textual strategies that Jünger employs in his literature, which ought to facilitate the initiation of those who did not directly participate in the Great War to the circle of the 'Frontsoldaten.' Following this, the analysis of his Politische Publizistik shows that Jünger is continuously striving for a dynamic modern nationalism that always already aims at protruding beyond the borders of the state. And lastly, an examination of Der Arbeiter will show that Jünger conceptually dissolves those borders, by heralding the planetary era of the worker based on a new concept of language that stems from the CHAPTER I »MICH REIZT DIE WILDE SCHÖNHEIT DER GEFAHR«-Baring the Roots of Ernst Jünger's Aggressive Aesthetic .
Ernst Jünger, total mobilisation and the work of war
Organization, 2017
This review article explores three interconnected texts written in the 1920s and 1930s by the German intellectual Ernst Jünger: Copse 125, Total Mobilisation and The Worker. Dominion and Form. They contain his original analyses of the relationship between war, destruction, organisation and technology. Jünger argued that entering the realm of total organisation, that is, organisation which claims its ground to be scientific, calculated, planned, rationally-administered and technological, destruction is subtly appropriated into, and thought of, as a process of production. Jünger understood war as an increasingly 'necessary' and permanent requirement of the politics of peace and freedom. He anticipated the transformation of destruction into a major field of experimentation with, and through, complex state and private organisational networks (civilian, military and corporate), and into a prime arena of scientific, technological and managerial development. He analysed the emergence of new political discourses and systems whose common ground was to invoke permanent insecurity, risks and dangers and claim the need to manage the peaceful existence of liberal societies.
Karsten Uhl, Technology in Modern German History: 1800 to the Present, New York: Bloomsbury 2022.
2022
People often associate postwar Germany with technology and with its products of mass consumption, such as luxury cars. Even pop music, most notably Kraftwerk (literally 'power station') with songs such as Autobahn, Radioactivity or We are the Robots, disseminates the stereotype of a close link between German culture and technology. Technology in Modern German History explores various forms of technology in 200 years of German history and explains how technology has been fundamental to the shaping of modern Germany. The book investigates the role technology played in transforming Germany's culture, society and politics during the 19th and 20th centuries. Key topics covered include the different stages of industrialization, the growth of networked cities, and the triumph of a teleological narrative of technology as progress. Moreover, it provides a critical revision of the history of high technology which reveals how high-tech euphoria determined certain paths in history regardless of whether the respective technology proved to be successful. In its second part, the volume introduces new avenues in scholarship. Karsten Uhl examines neglected areas, such as rural technologies or the often-overlooked importance of everyday technologies: How did consumers or workers use new technologies? How did they appropriate and modify them? Lastly, the book considers the final decades of the 20th century and asks if they provided a significant new quality of technological change: To what degree and effects did computerization transform professional and private life in Germany? In culture and politics, reinforced by the German variety of environmentalism, the idea of progress was challenged, as the once prevailing vision of progress gave way to new apprehensions of uncertainty evident to this day.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.