Smoking and XPC Gene Polymorphism Interact to Modulate the Risk of Oral Cancer (original) (raw)
Related papers
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2019
Background: Environmental carcinogens cause DNA damages which if not repaired properly, may increase the risk of cancer. The Xerodermapigmentosum group D (XPD) and group G (XPG) genes are essential genes for DNA repair and alteration in DNA repair causes cancer. The present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between XPD and XPG polymorphisms and risk of oral pre cancer and cancer. Methods: Present study genotyped 302 samples of oral diseases and 300 controls for XPD (A/C) and XPG (G/C) polymorphisms with PCR-RFLP method. Results: Our result showed that compared to AA genotype frequency of AC and CC genotype for XPD(A/C) polymorphism were significantly lower among cases than in control and are associated with decreased risk of oral diseases (OR= 0.621 and 0.603 respectively). In contrast with reference to GG genotype the frequency of CC genotype of XPG (G/C) was significantly higher in case than in control population (p value=0.004) and found to increase the risk of oral diseases (OR= 2.077). Particularly C allele for XPD A/C polymorphism was found to be associated with decreased risk of Lichen planus and increased risk of (OR = 0.470 and 1.541 respectively) oral cancer. While C allele of XPG G/C polymorphism significantly increased the risk of Oral Submucous Fibrosis and Leukoplakia (OR= 1.879 and 1.837 respectively) but not of Lichen planus and oral cancer. In combined genotype analysis from the aforesaid polymorphisms presence of C allele for XPD (A/C) polymorphisms were found to decrease the risk of oral diseases. However, the same C allele was observed to increase the chance of having high stage disease (OR= 5.71) with nodal involvement (OR= 6.78) once the cancer been initiated. Conclusion: This work shows association of XPD (A/C), XPG (G/C) polymorphisms with the development of pre oral cancer as well as oral cancer and its clinical courses.
Tobacco consumption in various forms is one of the major risk factor for the development of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Polymorphisms in XRCC1 and XRCC2 genes may alter an individual’s susceptibility to tobacco-related cancers. Here, we have investigated the interaction of XRCC1 (Arg399Gln) and XRCC2 (Arg188His) polymorphism and tobacco exposure in the progression of HNSCC in northeast Indian population. The population-based case–control study includes 110 HNSCC patients and 140 controls. The polymorphisms of XRCC1 and XRCC2 were studied by means of PCR–RFLP, and the results were confirmed by DNA sequencing. Smokers and tobacco-betel quid chewers were significantly higher in cases (P = 0.045 and 0.033). The variant homozygote AA genotype of XRCC1 Arg399Gln and heterozygote GA genotype of XRCC2 Arg188His has an increased risk toward HNSCC (OR 2.43; P = 0.031 and OR 3.29; P < 0.01, respectively). The interaction between tobacco-betel quid chewing and variant genotypes of XRCC1 and XRCC2 resulted in several fold increase the risk of HNSCC, when compared to non-chewers. Heavy smokers carrying XRCC1 AA and XRCC2 GA genotypes had a significantly higher risk of HNSCC compared to never smokers (P = 0.017 and 0.003, respectively). Upon gene–gene interaction analysis, individuals carrying both XRCC1 GA (Arg/Gln) and XRCC2 GA (Arg/His) genotypes had the highest risk of HNSCC (P = 0.001).Our finding suggests that interaction of tobacco and polymorphisms of XRCC1 and XRCC2 increases the risk of HNSCC. Furthermore, cross talk between these two DNA repair genes might modulate susceptibility toward HNSCC.
In the present study, we investigated the effect of the DNA repair gene polymorphisms XPD Asp312Asn (G>A), APE1 Asp148Glu (T>G), and MUTYH Tyr165Cys (G>A) on the risk for head and neck cancer (HNC) in association with tobacco use in a population of Northeast India. The study subjects comprised of 80 HNC patients and 92 healthy controls. Genotyping was performed using amplification refractory mutation system—PCR (ARMS-PCR) for XPD Asp312Asn (G>A) and PCR using confronting two-pair primers (PCR-CTPP) for APE1 Asp148Glu (T>G) and MUTYH Tyr165Cys (G>A). The XPD Asp/Asn genotype increased the risk for HNC by 2-fold (odds ratio, OR=2.072; 95 % CI, 1.025–4.190; p<0.05). Interaction between APE1 Asp/Asp and XPD Asp/Asn as well as MUTYH Tyr/Tyr and XPD Asp/Asn genotypes further increased the risk by 2.9 (OR=2.97; 95 % CI, 1.16–7.61; p<0.05) and 2.3 (OR= 2.37; 95 % CI, 1.11–5.10; p<0.05) folds, respectively. The risk was further increased in heavy smokers with the XPD Asp/Asn genotype and heavy tobacco chewers with XPD Asn/Asn genotype by 7.7-fold (OR=7.749; 95 % CI, 2.53– 23.70; p<0.05) and 10-fold (OR=10; 95 % CI, 1.26–79.13;p<0.05), respectively. We thus conclude that the XPD Asp312Asn and APE1 Asp148Glu polymorphisms increase the risk for HNC in association with smoking and/or tobacco chewing in the population under study.
Current Problems in Cancer, 2019
XRCC1 gene is an integral component of the base excision repair pathway regulating DNA repair, the genetic alterations in which has been documented to be associated with cancers of multiple etiologies. The present study aimed to evaluate the key polymorphisms in XRCC1 gene for its association with pathogenesis of oral cavity cancer (OCC) in Kamrup Urban District of Assam, India. Tissue biopsies (N = 152) clinicopathologically characterized OCCs were collected along with whole blood samples (N = 190) from healthy controls with all clinical and habitual details. A PCR-RFLP approach was used to study the XRCC1 polymorphisms, and statistical associations with pathogenesis were studied with SPSSv13.0 statistical software. The XRCC1 codon 194 polymorphism was significantly associated with the risk of OCC (odds ratio [OR] = 1.878, P = 0.048) and severity (OR = 2.221, P = 0.031). The presence of XRCC1 280 variant genotype increased the risk of OCC in exclusive smokers (OR = 3.818, P = 0.006), exclusive alcoholics (OR = 3.144, P = 0.027), and in exclusive areca nut chewers (OR = 3.055, P = 0.034). Human papilloma virus cases with any other habitual risk factor carrying XRCC1 280 genotype showed 3-fold significantly increased risk compared to controls (OR = 3.341, P = 0.022). The presence of XRCC1 codon 399 polymorphism was also found to be associated with significantly increased risk of oral cavity carcinoma (OR = 1.566, P = 0.049).
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers …, 2005
An individual's susceptibility to oral precancer and cancer depends not only on tobacco exposure but also on the genotypes/haplotypes at susceptible loci. In this hospitalbased case-control study, 310 cancer patients, 197 leukoplakia patients, and 348 controls were studied to determine risk of the disease due to polymorphisms at three sites on XRCC1 and one site on XRCC3. Independently, variant genotypes on these loci did not modulate risk of leukoplakia and cancer except for the XRCC1 (codon 280) risk genotype in exclusive smokeless tobacco users with leukoplakia [odds ratios (OR), 2.4; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.0-5.7]. But variant haplotypes, containing one variant allele, on XRCC1 increased the risk of leukoplakia (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.7). Among stratified samples, mixed tobacco users, carrying variant haplotypes, also had increased risk of both leukoplakia (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.9) and cancer (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.1). In a previous study on this population, it was shown that the GSTM3 (A/A) genotype increased the risk of oral leukoplakia and cancer among smokers, which has also been substantiated in this study with expanded sample sizes. The simultaneous presence of two risk genotypes in smokers, one on each of two loci, GSTM3 and XRCC1 (codon 280), increased the risk of cancer (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.0-5.8). Again, smokers carrying two risk genotypes, one on each of two loci, GSTM3 and XRCC1 (codon 399), were also overrepresented in both leukoplakia and cancer populations (P trend = 0.02 and 0.04, respectively) but enhancement of risks were not observed; probably due to small sample sizes. Therefore, the presence of variant haplotypes on XRCC1 and two risk genotypes, one on each of two loci, GSTM3 and XRCC1, could be useful to determine the leukoplakias that might progress to cancer in a group of patients.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 2005
An individual's susceptibility to oral precancer and cancer depends not only on tobacco exposure but also on the genotypes/haplotypes at susceptible loci. In this hospitalbased case-control study, 310 cancer patients, 197 leukoplakia patients, and 348 controls were studied to determine risk of the disease due to polymorphisms at three sites on XRCC1 and one site on XRCC3. Independently, variant genotypes on these loci did not modulate risk of leukoplakia and cancer except for the XRCC1 (codon 280) risk genotype in exclusive smokeless tobacco users with leukoplakia [odds ratios (OR), 2.4; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.0-5.7]. But variant haplotypes, containing one variant allele, on XRCC1 increased the risk of leukoplakia (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.7). Among stratified samples, mixed tobacco users, carrying variant haplotypes, also had increased risk of both leukoplakia (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.9) and cancer (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.1). In a previous study on this population, it was shown that the GSTM3 (A/A) genotype increased the risk of oral leukoplakia and cancer among smokers, which has also been substantiated in this study with expanded sample sizes. The simultaneous presence of two risk genotypes in smokers, one on each of two loci, GSTM3 and XRCC1 (codon 280), increased the risk of cancer (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.0-5.8). Again, smokers carrying two risk genotypes, one on each of two loci, GSTM3 and XRCC1 (codon 399), were also overrepresented in both leukoplakia and cancer populations (P trend = 0.02 and 0.04, respectively) but enhancement of risks were not observed; probably due to small sample sizes. Therefore, the presence of variant haplotypes on XRCC1 and two risk genotypes, one on each of two loci, GSTM3 and XRCC1, could be useful to determine the leukoplakias that might progress to cancer in a group of patients. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
XRCC1, XRCC3, XPD gene polymorphisms, smoking and 32P-DNA adducts in a sample of healthy subjects
DNA repair genes have an important role in protecting individuals from cancer-causing agents. Polymorphisms in several DNA repair genes have been identified and individuals with non-dramatic reductions in the capacity to repair DNA damage are observed in the population, but the impact of specific genetic variants on repair phenotype and cancer risk has not yet been clarified. In 308 healthy Italian individuals belonging to the prospective European project EPIC, we have investigated the relationship between DNA damage, as measured by 32 P-DNA adduct levels, and three genetic polymorphisms in different repair genes: XRCC1-Arg399Gln (exon 10), XRCC3-Thr241Met (exon 7) and XPD-Lys751Gln (exon 23). DNA adduct levels were measured as relative adduct level (RAL) per 10 9 normal nucleotides by DNA 32 P-post-labelling assay in white blood cells from peripheral blood. Genotyping was performed by PCR-RFLP analysis. The XRCC3-241Met variant was significantly associated with higher DNA adduct levels, whereas XRCC1-399Gln and XPD-751Gln were associated with higher DNA adduct levels only in never-smokers. XRCC3-241Met homozygotes had an average DNA adduct level of 11.44 ⍨ 1.48 (⍨SE) compared with 7.69 ⍨ 0.88 in Thr/Met heterozygotes and 6.94 ⍨ 1.11 in Thr/Thr homozygotes (F ⍧ 3.206, P ⍧ 0.042). Never-smoking XRCC1-399Gln homozygotes had an average DNA adduct level of 15.60 ⍨ 5.42 compared with 6.16 ⍨ 0.97 in Gln/ Arg heterozygotes and 6.78 ⍨ 1.10 in Arg/Arg homozygotes (F ⍧ 5.237, P ⍧ 0.007). A significant odds ratio (3.81, 95% CI 1.02-14.16) to have DNA adduct levels above median value was observed for XPD-751Gln versus XPD-751Lys never-smoking homozygotes after adjustment for several confounders. These data show that all the analysed polymorphisms could result in deficient DNA repair and Abbreviations: BER, base excision repair; EPIC, European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition; NER, nucleotide excision repair; OR, odds ratio; RAL, relative adduct level; SE, standard error; WBC, white blood cells; XPD, xeroderma pigmentosum-D gene; XRCC 1-3, X-ray repair cross complementing groups 1-3.
Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine, 2007
BACKGROUND: Many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been found to be associated with oral cancer but the biological interactions through SNPs are seldom addressed. In this study, we focused on the joint effect for SNP combinations of four DNA repair genes, X-ray repair cross-complementing groups (XRCCs) 1-4, involved in major cancer-related pathways. METHODS: Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping was determined using by polymerase chain reactionrestriction fragment length polymorphism in this study (case = 103, control = 98). Different numbers of combinational SNPs with genotypes called the pseudo-haplotypes from these chromosome-wide genes were used to evaluate their joint effect on oral cancer risk. RESULTS: Except for XRCC2 rs2040639-AG, none of these SNPs was found to individually contribute to oral cancer risk. However, for two combined SNPs, the proportion of subjects with oral cancer was significantly higher in the pseudo-haplotype with AG-CC genotypes in rs2040639-rs861539 (XRCC2-XRCC3) compared with those with non-AG-CC genotypes. Similarly, the pseudo-haplotype of rs2040639-rs861539-rs2075685 (XRCC2-XRCC3-XRCC4) and rs2040639-rs861539-rs2075685-rs1799782 (XRCCs 1-4) with specific genotype pattern (AG-CC-TG and CT-AG-CC-TG) among three and four combinational SNPs were significantly associated with oral cancer. After controlling for age, gender, smoking, drinking, and betel nut chewing, the estimated odds ratio of oral cancer were 2.45, 5.03, and 10.10 for two, three and four specific SNP combinations, respectively, comparing these specific pseudo-haplotypes to their corresponding non-pseudohaplotypes. CONCLUSION: We have identified the potential combined XRCCs 1-4 SNPs with genotypes that were associated with oral cancer risk and may have an impact on identification of a high-risk population.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2005
Tobacco and alcohol consumption are the major risk factors for head and neck cancer, likely due to DNA-damaging processes. Genetic variations in DNA repair genes may affect an individual's susceptibility to head and neck cancer. Pooling data and DNA specimens from three case-control studies in western Washington State, North Carolina, and Puerto Rico, totaling 555 cases (430 whites) and 792 controls (695 whites), we studied the risk of head and neck cancer in relation to common nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms in four DNA repair genes: MGMT (Leu84Phe and Ile143Val), XRCC1 (Arg399Gln), XPD (Lys751Gln), and XRCC3 (Thr241Met). All single-nucleotide polymorphisms were assayed in a single laboratory. Among whites, carriage of the MGMT Phe84 [odds ratio (OR), 0.71; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.51-0.98] or Val143 (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.92) allele was associated with a decreased risk of head and neck cancer; the haplotype distribution for MGMT differed significant...
Toxicological Sciences, 2010
The impact of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the DNA repair gene XPC on DNA repair capacity (DRC) and genotoxicity has not been comprehensively determined. We constructed a comprehensive haplotype map encompassing all common XPC SNPs and evaluated the effect of Bayesian-inferred haplotypes on DNA damage associated with tobacco smoking, using chromosome aberrations (CA) as a biomarker. We also used the mutagen-sensitivity assay, in which mutagen-induced CA in cultured lymphocytes are determined, to evaluate the haplotype effects on DRC. We hypothesized that if certain XPC haplotypes have functional effects, a correlation between these haplotypes and baseline and/or mutagen-induced CA would exist. Using HapMap and single nucleotide polymorphism (dbSNP) databases, we identified 92 SNPs, of which 35 had minor allele frequencies ‡ 0.05. Bayesian inference and subsequent phylogenetic analysis identified 21 unique haplotypes, which segregated into six distinct phylogenetically grouped haplotypes (PGHs A-F). A SNP tagging approach used identified 11 tagSNPs representing these 35 SNPs (r 2 5 0.80). We utilized these tagSNPs to genotype a population of smokers matched to nonsmokers (n 5 123). Haplotypes for each individual were reconstituted and PGH designations were assigned. Relationships between XPC haplotypes and baseline and/or mutagen-induced CA were then evaluated. We observed significant interaction among smoking and PGH-C (p 5 0.046) for baseline CA where baseline CA was 3.5 times higher in smokers compared to nonsmokers. Significant interactions among smoking and PGH-D (p 5 0.023) and PGH-F (p 5 0.007) for mutageninduced CA frequencies were also observed. These data indicate that certain XPC haplotypes significantly alter CA and DRC in smokers and, thus, can contribute to cancer risk.