Hybrid Emerging Threats and Information Warfare: The Story of the Cyber-AI Deception Machine (original) (raw)

Abstract

Across the world, at any given moment, there are pervasive cognitive-emotional conflicts being waged for the control of populations' thoughts, emotions, and attitudes. These battles of influence do not tend to occur in wartime, but rather in peacetime, infiltrating homes and smart cities. They sow disinformation, affective manipulation, and forgeries as new means of undermining social cohesion and trust. They exacerbate societal tensions and amplify public polarization. They increasingly condition and limit notions of self-determination and could continue to do so with the future generations to come. The rise of cognitive-emotional conflicts and the subsequent "trust-deficit disorder" they unleash is born out of the entanglement of technology, data, and geopolitics. The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) with other emerging technologies creates the potential for deception and subversive attacks that manipulate populations' perceptions. In the near future, what will matter is not who "wins" new territories, but who controls the data and wins the trust, the hearts, and the minds of citizens within any given country or polity. Cyberspace has become not only a new domain of fierce competition over information, business, and strategic technological operations, but also a new battlefield, in ways that blur the line between war and peace and make each of us a potential

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (66)

  1. Accenture website. n.d.. Available at https://www.accenture.com/us-en/service-open-to-disrupt.
  2. Ahiataku, S. 2018. Engaging young innovators in Kumasi with innovation clinic. Global Lab Network; 3 March. https://glabghana.wordpress.com.
  3. Alfifi, M., et al. 2018. Measuring the impact of ISIS social media strategy. http://snap.stanford.edu/ mis2/files/MIS2_paper_23.pdf.
  4. Applegate, S.D. 2013. The dawn of kinetic cyber. 5th International Conference on Cyber Conflict; K. Podins, J. Stinissen, M. Maybaum (Eds.). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ document/6568376.
  5. BBC. 2019. Heathrow airport drone sighting halts departures. BBC News; 8 January. https://www. bbc.com/news/uk-46803713. Also see "Gatwick and Heathrow buying anti-drone equipment." BBC News; 4 January. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-46754489.
  6. Bellingcat. 2018. Chemical weapons and absurdity: The disinformation campaign against the white helmets. A joint report in collaboration with Newsy; 18 December.
  7. Bing, C., and J. Schectman. 2019. Inside the UAE's secret hacking team of American Mercenaries. Reuters; 30 January. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-spying-raven/.
  8. Bradshaw, S., and P.N. Howard. 2018. Challenging truth and trust: A global inventory of organized social media manipulation. Computational Propaganda Research Project. https://comprop.oii. ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/93/2018/07/ct2018.pdf.
  9. Brundage, M., et al. 2018. The malicious use of artificial intelligence: Forecasting, pre- vention, and mitigation. University of Oxford. February: p. 44. https://arxiv.org/ pdf/1802.07228.pdf; and, Press, G. 2018. The AI cybersecurity arms-race: The bad guys are way ahead. Forbes; 26 April. https://www.forbes.com/sites/gilpress/2018/04/26/ the-ai-cybersecurity-arms-race-the-bad-guys-are-way-ahead/#3fc3ac28148e
  10. Choudhary, V. 2019. Does international humanitarian law respond adequately to information war- fare? Groningen Journal of International Law, Blog; 21 March. https://grojil.org/2019/03/21/ the-truth-under-siege-does-international-humanitarian-law-respond-adequately-to-informa- tion-warfare/ Council of Europe. 2018. A.4. in Council of Europe, Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights. 2018. Legal challenges related to the hybrid war and human rights obligations. 14 March. http://website-pace.net/documents/19838/4246196/20180314-HybridWar-EN. pdf/3387f663-0e5d-407e-a90b-9e5880474589
  11. DarkTrace. n.d. DarkTrace's website: https://www.darktrace.com/technology/. "The Threat Visualizer is Darktrace's real-time, 3D threat notification interface. As well as displaying threat alerts, the Threat Visualizer provides a graphical overview of the day-to-day activity of your network(s), which is easy to use, and accessible for both security specialists and business exec- utives. Using cutting-edge visualization techniques, the Threat Visualizer user interface auto- matically alerts analysts to significant incidents and threats within their environments, enabling analysts to proactively investigate specific areas of the infrastructure."
  12. DiResta, R., et al. 2018. The disinformation report. New Knowledge and the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee: p. 50. https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/4326998/ira-report-rebrand\_ FinalJ14.pdf.
  13. Douek. 2018. Douek E. 2018. Facebook's role in the genocide in Myanmar: New report- ing complicates the narrative. Lawfare; 22 October. https://www.lawfareblog.com/ facebooks-role-genocide-myanmar-new-reporting-complicates-narrative.
  14. Dunlap, G., and E. Pauwels. 2017. The intelligent and connected Bio-Labs of the Future: Promise and Peril in the Fourth industrial revolution. Wilson Center Policy Briefs (October): pp. 4-6. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/dunlap\_pauwels\_intelligent\_connected\_bio- labs_of_future.pdf.
  15. Dvorsky, G. 2017. Hackers have already started to weaponize artificial intelligence. Gizmodo 11 September. https://gizmodo.com/hackers-have-already-started-to-weaponize-artificial- in-1797688425.
  16. E-ISAC. 2016. Analysis of the cyber attack on the Ukrainian Power Grid. Defense Use Case; 18 March. https://www.nerc.com/pa/CI/ESISAC/Documents/E-ISAC\_SANS\_Ukraine\_ DUC_18Mar2016.pdf.
  17. Eubanks, N. 2017. The trust cost of cybercrime for business. Forbes; 13 July. https://www.forbes. com/sites/theyec/2017/07/13/the-true-cost-of-cybercrime-for-businesses/#38953fec4947.
  18. Firestone, K. 2018. 2018 manufacturing outlook and 3D-printing's impact. manufacturing.net; 16 January. https://www.manufacturing.net/blog/2018/01/2018-manufacturing-outlook-and- 3d-printings-impact.
  19. Fox, D. 2016. What sparked the Cambrian explosion? Nature; 16 February. https://www.nature. com/news/what-sparked-the-cambrian-explosion-1.19379.
  20. Gavrilovic, A. 2018. [WebDebate summary] Algorithmic diplomacy: Better geopolitical analysis? Concerns about human rights? DiploFoundation; 12 June. https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/ webdebate-summary-algorithmic-diplomacy-better-geopolitical-analysis-concerns-about- human.
  21. Granville, K. 2018. Facebook and Cambridge analytica: What you need to know as fallout widens. The New York Times; 19 March. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/19/technology/facebook- cambridge-analytica-explained.html.
  22. Gleiser, M. 2018. Biometric data and the rise of digital dictatorship. NPR; 28 February. https://www.npr. org/sections/13.7/2018/02/28/589477976/biometric-data-and-the-rise-of-digital-dictatorship.
  23. Gwynne, P., and G. Heebner. 2018. Laboratory technology trends: Lab automation and tobotics, the Brave New World of 24/7 Research. Science; 18 January. http://www.sciencemag.org/site/ products/robotfinal.xhtml.
  24. Hern, A. 2015. Anonymous 'at war' with ISIS, hacktivist group confirms. The Guardian; 7 November. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/nov/17/anonymous-war-isis- hacktivist-group-confirms.
  25. ---. 2018. Cambridge Analytica: How did it turn clicks into votes? The Guardian; 6 May. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/may/06/cambridge-analytica-how-turn-clicks- into-votes-christopher-wylie.
  26. HIC. 2018. U.S. house intelligence committee. https://investigaterussia.org/media/2018-04-27/ house-intelligence-gop-releases-russia-report -https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/ hpsci_-_declassified_committee_report_redacted_final_redacted.pdf.
  27. Human Rights Council. 2018. Report of the independent international fact-finding mis- sion on Myanmar: p. 14. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/FFM- Myanmar/A_HRC_39_64.pdf.
  28. ICRC. 2017a. International Committee of the Red Cross. 2017. Experts discuss new technolo- gies in warfare and international humanitarian law. 22 December. https://www.icrc.org/en/ document/experts-discuss-new-technologies-warfare-and-international-humanitarian-law.
  29. ---. 2017b. International Committee of the Red Cross. 2013. Cyber warfare and inter- national humanitarian law: the ICRC's position. p. 2. https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/ files/2013/130621-cyber-warfare-q-and-a-eng.pdf.
  30. Ienca, M., and R. Andorno. 2017. Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13 (5). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC5447561/.
  31. India Times. 2018. Soon WhatsApp will only let you forward 5 messages at once, as it tries to wrestle with rumours. India Times; 20 July. https://www.indiatimes.com/technology/news/ whatsapp-will-only-let-you-forward-5-messages-in-india-as-a-way-to-restrict-spread-of- rumours-349697.html.
  32. Iwanek K. 2018. WhatsApp, fake news? The internet and risks of misinformation in India. The Diplomat; 30 July. https://thediplomat.com/2018/07/whatsapp-fake-news- the-internet-and-risks-of-misinformation-in-india/.
  33. Iyyer, M., et al. 2014. Political ideology detection using recursive neural netoworks. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: pp. 1113-1122. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P14-1105.
  34. Kiseleva, M., and A. Coleman. 2018. Russian TV airs video game as Syria war footage. BBC News; 26 February. https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-news-from-elsewhere-43198324.
  35. Kleber, S. 2018. 3 ways AI is getting more emotional. Harvard Business Review; 31 July. https:// hbr.org/2018/07/3-ways-ai-is-getting-more-emotional.
  36. Lentzos, F. 2018. The Russian disinformation attack that poses a biological danger. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists; 19 November. https://thebulletin.org/2018/11/ the-russian-disinformation-attack-that-poses-a-biological-danger/.
  37. Maan, A. 2018. Narrative warfare. RealClear Defense; 27 February. https://www.realcleardefense. com/articles/2018/02/27/narrative_warfare_113118.html.
  38. Marwick, A., and R. Lewis. 2017. Media manipulation and disinformation online. Data & Society. https://centerformediajustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/DataAndSociety\_ MediaManipulationAndDisinformationOnline.pdf. Also see: Polonski V. 2017. "Artificial Intelligence Has the Power to Destroy or Save Democracy." Council on Foreign Relations;
  39. Mayer, M. 2018. Artificial intelligence and cyber power from a strategic perspective. IFS Insights; April. https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2497514/IFS%20
  40. Insights_4_2018_Mayer.pdf.
  41. Miles, T. 2018. U.N. investigators cite Facebook role in Myanmar crisis. Reuters; 12 March. Mindstrong website. n.d. Mindstrong health's digital biomarkers, see Mindstrong's website avail- able at: https://mindstronghealth.com/science/.
  42. Mozur, P. 2018. Mozur P. 2018. A genocide incited on Facebook, with posts from Myanmar's military. The New York Times; 15 October. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/15/technology/myan- mar-facebook-genocide.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage.
  43. Nicola, A.C. 2018. Taming the trolls: The Need for an international legal framework to regu- late State Use of Disinformation on Social Media. The Georgetown Law Journal Online 107: 36-62. https://georgetownlawjournal.org/articles/296/taming-trolls-need-for/pdf.
  44. Pauwels, E. 2018. China is pushing hard to overtake Silicon Valley and win the biotech race, and gain control of the world's biological data, South China Morning Post, November 22, 2018.
  45. P&S Market Research. 2017. Artificial Intelligence (AI) in cyber security market. https://www. psmarketresearch.com/market-analysis/artificial-intelligence-in-cyber-security-market.
  46. Rai, S. 2018. How Facebook uses 'WhatsApp phones' to tap next emerging market. The Economic Times; 3 December. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/world-news/ how-facebook-uses-whatsapp-phones-to-tap-next-emerging-market/articleshow/66914406. cms. Robertson, I. 2016). Kremlin falls for its own fake satellite imagery. The Daily Beast; 4 March. https://www.thedailybeast.com/kremlin-falls-for-its-own-fake-satellite-imagery. Pauwels, E. 2018. China pins its hopes on beating US in race for bio-intelligence supremacy, South China Morning Post; 27 November. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/2174815/ china-pins-its-hopes-beating-us-race-bio-intelligence-supremacy.
  47. Robinson, G., et al. 2019. Bots and the ballot box: Is Facebook prepared for Asia's elec- tions? Nikkei Asian Review; 30 January. https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Cover-Story/ Bots-and-the-ballot-box-Is-Facebook-prepared-for-Asia-s-elections.
  48. Signe, L., and K. Signe 2018. Global cybercrimes and weak cybersecurity threaten busi- nesses in Africa. Brookings Institute; 20 May. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/ africa-in-focus/2018/05/30/global-cybercrimes-and-weak-cybersecurity-threaten-busi- nesses-in-africa/.
  49. Sputnik News. 2018. US, UK and France prepare new strike against Syria -Russian MoD. Sputnik News; 25 August. https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201808251067461189- us-uk-france-syria-new-strike-russia/.
  50. Stecklow, S. 2018. Why Facebook is losing the war on hate speech in Myanmar. Reuters; 15 August. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/myanmar-facebook-hate/.
  51. Tallinn Manual. 2017a. Tallinn manual on the international law applicable to cyber warfare. Cambridge University Press, 2013. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/tallinn-man- ual-on-the-international-law-applicable-to-cyber-warfare/50C5BFF166A7FED75B4EA6 43AC677DAE.
  52. The Economist. 2016. China's digital dictatorship; Big data and government. 421(9020);
  53. 17 December. https://wrlc-gm.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=proquest 1849561391&context=PC&vid=01WRLC_GML:01WRLC_GML&search_scope=MyInst_ and_CI&tab=Everything&lang=en. Also see: The Syria Campaign. 2017. The Syria Campaign. 2017. Killing the Truth. https://thesyriacam- paign.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/KillingtheTruth.pdf.
  54. Turgeman, A. 2018. Machine Learning and Behavioral Biometrics: A Match Made in Heaven." Forbes; 18 January. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2018/01/18/ machine-learning-and-behavioral-biometrics-a-match-made-in-heaven/#3b5a038e3306.
  55. UN Secretary General. 2018. UN Secretary General's Address to the General Assembly, New York, 25 September 2018. https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2018-09-25/ secretary-generals-address-general-assembly-delivered-trilingual.
  56. Villasenor, J. 2018. Artificial Intelligence and the future of geopolitics. Brookings Institute; 14 November. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2018/11/14/artificial- intelligence-and-the-future-of-geopolitics/.
  57. Volodzko, D. 2019. Is South Korea sliding toward digital dictatorship? Forbes; 25 February. https:// www.forbes.com/sites/davidvolodzko/2019/02/25/is-south-korea-sliding-toward-digital-dictat orship/#61a2b37648e2.
  58. Wagner, D. 2016. Expert commentary: The growing threat of cyber-attacks on criti- cal infrastructure." IRMI; 2016. https://www.irmi.com/articles/expert-commentary/ cyber-attack-critical-infrastructure.
  59. Walker, S. 2017. Russia's 'irrefutable evidence' of US help for ISIS appears to be video game still. The Guardian; 14 November. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/nov/14/ russia-us-isis-syria-video-game-still.
  60. Ward, A. 2018. ISIS's use of social media still poses a threat to stability in the Middle East and Africa. RAND; December. https://www.rand.org/blog/2018/12/isiss-use-of-social-media- still-poses-a-threat-to-stability.html.
  61. Watson, B. 2017. The drones of ISIS. Defense One; 12 January.
  62. Wei, H., et al. 2016. Beyond the words: Predicting user personality from heterogeneous infor- mation. Microsoft, Micrsoft Research, Tsinghua University; February. https://www.microsoft. com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/WSDM_personality.pdf.
  63. Wells II, L. 2017. Cognitive-emotional conflict: Adversary will and social resilience. Prism: National Defense University; No. 2. https://cco.ndu.edu/Portals/96/Documents/prism/prism\_7- 2/2-Cognitive-Emotional_Conflict.pdf?ver=2017-12-21-110638-877.
  64. Wooley, S.C., and Howard, P.N. 2017. Computational propaganda worldwide: Executive sum- mary. Computational Propaganda Research Project. https://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/ working-papers/computational-propaganda-worldwide-executive-summary/.
  65. Wrona, K. 2017. Cyber warfare in smart environments. In Defence future technologies: What we see on the horizon, Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft: pp. 93-96. https://deftech.ch/What- We-See-On-The-Horizon/armasuisseW%2BT_Defence-Future-Technologies-What-We-See- On-The-Horizon-2017_HD.pdf.
  66. Ziff, Benjamine (Deputy Assistant Secretary). 2015. Testimony before the SFRC Europe Subcommittee. U.S. Senate; 3 November. https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/ doc/110315_Ziff_Testimony.pdf.