Post-Critique, Politics, and the Political in Educational Philosophy (original) (raw)
Related papers
Reply: The Alleged (De)Politicization Problem of Post-Critical Pedagogy Reconsidered
This essay tries to intervene in the discussion between Naomi Hodgson on the one hand and Joris Vlieghe and Piotr Zamojski on the other about the meaning and function of the political in and for education. Firstly, it argues against the common charge of essentialism that is brought against ontological philosophies in general and the Heideggerian ontology of Vlieghe and Zamojski in particular. Secondly, the essay suggests the existentialist concept of 'the situation' as a theoretical nodal point that can grasp the inherently quasi-political dimension of pedagogical work and hence provide common ground for the two positions discussed.
Learning and Teaching British Values, 2017
This chapter outlines key features of critical pedagogy such as reflection and critical consciousness. I argue that teachers and students wanting to explore identities, social experiences and belongings would benefit from using critical pedagogy approaches in the classroom. I show that critical pedagogy complements the research methodologies discussed in Chap. 2, and that critical pedagogy is especially important in neoliberal times when the emphasis is on the individual. Education should not be about creating subservient automatons unwilling to rise up to transform the social injustices pervading local, national and globalised spaces. Education needs to inspire and enable students to grow in confidence to critique the oppressive social order. Critical pedagogy can counter-neoliberal ideologies and promote collaboration, collective action, social justice and social change. Keywords Critical pedagogy • Critical consciousness • Social justice Education • Neoliberalism What Is CrItICal Pedagogy? Paulo Freire, often cited as one of the original critical pedagogues, argued for a progressive pedagogy of possibility, with its basis in education for liberation: traditional banking methods of education where teachers-held knowledge which they routinely and uninspiringly transferred to students CHAPTER 3
IN WHICH SENSE, IF ANY, IS EDUCATIONAL THEORY ‘POLITICAL’? A PRAGMATIST PERSPECTIVE
2023
This paper tackles the question of in which sense, if any, educational theory should be considered as 'political'. From a pragmatist perspective it evaluates three meanings of the term: first, the political as an exception, such as Rancière's interruption of the existing order, and second, the political as something that is always already given, such as in Derrida's concept of iteration. Third, the paper turns towards Rorty's plea for understanding philosophy as cultural politics, i.e., as intervention into the ongoing public discourse. It is argued that this third meaning of the term is better suited for understanding the political of educational theory as it is realistically modest and enables o analyze the political effectiveness of educational theory. These considerations are framed by both a reflection on the very possibility of drawing distinctions between theory and politics as well as an outlook on possible consequences following from an understanding of educational theory as cultural politics. In the outlook, the paper asks why we can hardly see any publicly relevant educational theory and provides suggestions for a “caring critique”, a careful attitude towards our own researching practices, situations, and assemblies.
Curriculum, Politics and the Postmodern; or, Beyond the Knowledge Question in Curriculum Inquiry
The question of knowledge has become a major issue in contemporary curriculum debates, world-wide. However it can be argued that this knowledge question has not always been addressed with sufficient flexibility or sophistication. The present chapter draws on poststructuralist theory and philosophy to explore issues of representation, power and democracy in post-reconceptualist curriculum inquiry. In this regard, it seeks to re-affirm the notion of ‘curriculum-as-political text’. It does so with reference to the formal installation since 2011 of a national curriculum in Australia, arguing the need to go beyond knowledge per se and for a re-assessment of the Postmodern, as a matter of crucial explanatory and symbolic significance. What else is at issue in the knowledge question? (NB: This paper was originally published in Portuguese translation in a Brazilian journal.)
MANIFESTATIONS OF THE POST-CRITICAL: FROM SHARED PRINCIPLES TO NEW PEDAGOGICAL PATHS
MANIFESTATIONS OF THE POST-CRITICAL: FROM SHARED PRINCIPLES TO NEW PEDAGOGICAL PATHS, 2020
In this introduction we give an account of the reasons for writing the Manifesto for a Post-Critical Pedagogy. These stem from our experiences in the field of educational research, as well as our work with teachers and future teachers, which we felt increasingly reflected the exhaustion of the critical paradigm in the humanities and social sciences, as discussed by Bruno Latour, Jacques Rancière and others. We summarise the main claims of the Manifesto, i.e. the principles we defend there, and explain why we find it important to do so. We elaborate on what we mean by principles with reference to the concept of «requirements» developed by Isabelle Stengers. We conclude with an overview of the projects that have emerged since the publication of the Manifesto illustrating the various ways in which the post-critical perspective has been taken up in educational research. In particular we highlight how this has been taken up in the development of specifically educational accounts of higher education, teaching, and upbringing.
The school as an arena of political contestation: towards a post-Marxist account of education
The object of this paper is to lay the foundations for a new critical perspective from which social science can research into education. The critical study of education has been dominated by the use of Marxism as a theoretical base upon which theorists can construct their own images of the school. I aim to show initially how such Marxist images of the school are locked into a problematic dualism in Marxist theory between the necessity of economic determinism and the political contingency of class struggle. I argue that the development of Marxist educational theory since the 1970s reveals the inescapable tendency for theorists to fall back on essentialism and determinism at the expense of analysis of the political-contingent nature of educational space. In response, I propose a moving the analysis of education into a post-Marxist terrain, where concepts in Marxism such as ideology, political struggle and hegemony are rearticulated in an anti-essentialist ontology. This involves recapturing the importance of relations of power and domination from within the historical context of political struggles over education at the discursive level. At this level, education is no longer perceived as an already existing structure of the state which is filled with ideology. The discursive formation of education marks the very constitution of educational structures through the process of hegemonic articulation - the attempts of political actors to determine the meaning and form of “education” through particular political discourses. The paper ends on some important implications for methodology, showing how a post-Marxist perspective can be utilised both in the analysis of education policy articulation, as well as in the ethnographic study of its implementation, subjectification and contestation within the education sphere.
Handbuch Bildungs- und Erziehungssoziologie, 2021
Within the last few years, the discourses of authoritarianism and the echoes of a fascist past have moved from the margins to the center of politics across the globe. Increasingly, pedagogy has been implicated in this process by becoming less a practice for freedom than an instrumentalized theory and practice for domination, particularly as the culture of education has been transformed to serve the culture of business or reduced to a regressive form of instrumental rationality. This lecture challenges this reactionary mode of education and pedagogy, particularly in its neoliberal versions, and explores how critical pedagogy might provide the theoretical and practical foundation for rethinking the purpose of education and the nature of politics itself, and how these two realms are inseparable. As a moral and political practice, pedagogy is represents not only a struggle over knowledge and values, but also over agency itself. Central to any viable notion of a critical pedagogy is the understanding that pedagogy is always a deliberate attempt on the part of educators to influence how and what knowledge and subjectivities are produced within particular sets of social relations. In this case, it draws attention to the ways in which knowledge, power, desire, and experience are produced under specific basic conditions of learning and in doing so rejects the notion that teaching is just a method or is removed from matters of values, norms, and power. In addition, central to such a task is rethinking the role of educators as public intellectuals and their responsibility not only to address crucial social problems but also to interrogate critically what it might mean to produce those pedagogical practices and formative cultures that are essential to any substantive democracy. An important issue addressed in this case is that pedagogy is always a moral and political practice and points not only to a struggle over agency and power, but also presupposes discourses of critique and
Teaching as a political act: The role of critical pedagogical practices and curriculum
Human Affairs, 2016
The present paper is an inquiry into the role of the teacher in the context of the dominant Indian value system, an imposed curriculum and teacher-students interactions from the social psychological and critical interdisciplinary perspectives. The role of the school in the present modernist worldview is to frame and impart knowledge which may lead to economic growth. In this context, the role of the teacher is observed as being limited to a bearer of information rather than a leader who visualizes change and develops critical ability among students. Based on the theoretical framework of postformalism and collective/social identity, the current work argues that the role of the teacher is not limited to passively following and communicating mainstream values but involves constructing a new participative identity through critical pedagogical engagement and by acting as an active agent of social change.