Ten-day triple therapyversussequential therapyversusconcomitant therapy as first-line treatment forHelicobacter pyloriinfection (original) (raw)
Related papers
Helicobacter, 2013
Background: Increasing clarithromycin resistance reduces Helicobacter pylori eradication rates with conventional triple regimens. We evaluated effectiveness and safety of a 10-day-quadruple nonbismuth containing regimen, as first-line treatment or second-line treatment (after conventional triple) for H. pylori, and assessed impact of antibiotic resistance on treatment success. Materials and methods: Eligible patients had upper GI endoscopy and positive CLO-test, also confirmed by histology and/or culture. The eradication scheme comprised: Esomeprazole 40 mg, Metronidazole 500 mg, Amoxicillin 1000 mg, and Clarithromycin 500 mg, twice daily, for 10 days. Treatment adherence and adverse effects were recorded. Eradication was tested by 13 C-urea breath test or histology. Results: One hundred and ninety out of 198 patients (115M/83F, aged 18-81, mean 52 years, 37% smokers, 27% ulcer disease) who completed the study protocol were evaluated for eradication. Adherence to treatment was 97.7% (95% CI 95.9-99.6). Six (3.2%) patients experienced severe side effects and discontinued treatment. Intention to treat and per protocol analysis in first line was 91.5% (95% CI 86.2-94.8) and 95% (95% CI 90.4-97.4) and in second line was 60.6% (95% CI 43.6-75.3) and 64.5% (95% CI 46.9-78.8), respectively. Antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed in 106 of 124 (85%) patients who gave consent. Among them 42 (40%) harbored clarithromycin resistant strains. Eradication rates were significantly higher in sensitive and single clarithromycin or metronidazole resistant (37/37, 100% and 43/47, 91%) than in dual resistant strains (12/22, 55%) (p < .0001). Specifically, concomitant regimen eradicated 7/10, 70% of dual resistant strains as first-line treatment and 5/12, 42% as second-line treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that dual resistance was the only independent significant predictor of treatment failure. Conclusions: The 10-days "concomitant" regimen is effective and safe firstline H. pylori treatment, in a high clarithromycin resistance area, although dual antibiotic resistance may compromise its effectiveness.
Low Efficacy of Clarithromycin Including Sequential Regimens for Helicobacter Pylori Infection
Helicobacter, 2012
The effective treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is still under investigation after quarter of a century experience with many drugs and regimens. The standard triple regimen has been most recommended treatment in last decade, but the success rate of this therapy has decreased fewer than 80% in many recent studies from different geographical areas . An epidemiological analysis of 94 H. pylori eradication trials with standard triple regimen in last 10 years showed a significant and gradual decrease of success rate down to 60% in Turkey . The ineffectiveness of this standard regimen was related to high clarithromycin resistance in most of the studies .
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology, 2013
Conventional triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication have recently shown a disappointing reduction in effectiveness in many countries. The main reason for failure was found to be bacterial resistance to one of the most commonly used antibiotics, clarithromycin. An additional problem for conventional triple therapy is the high rate of resistance to metronidazole found in Europe, America and Asia. In Italy, in the last 15 years a 2-fold increase in resistance has occurred. A recent study of the whole of Italy included about 20 patients from each region at the first endoscopic diagnosis of H. pylori infection. The most surprising
World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology, 2013
Conventional triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication have recently shown a disappointing reduction in effectiveness in many countries. The main reason for failure was found to be bacterial resistance to one of the most commonly used antibiotics, clarithromycin. An additional problem for conventional triple therapy is the high rate of resistance to metronidazole found in Europe, America and Asia. In Italy, in the last 15 years a 2-fold increase in resistance has occurred. A recent study of the whole of Italy included about 20 patients from each region at the first endoscopic diagnosis of H. pylori infection. The most surprising result was the patchy distribution of resistance, which was almost absent in two regions (one northern and one southern), although the highest prevalence was found in some regions of the South. In the paediatric population we found a 25% prevalence of resistance in a sample of H. pylori positive children observed between 2002 and 2007,...
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2009
Clarithromycin-based triple therapy has been commonly applied as the first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Levofloxacin could serve as an alternative in either first-line or second-line regimens. This study surveyed the prevalence of levofloxacin resistance of H. pylori isolates in naive patients and in patients with a failed clarithromycin-based triple therapy. Methods: The study collected the H. pylori isolates from 180 naive patients and 47 patients with a failed clarithromycin-based triple therapy. Their in vitro antimicrobial resistance was determined by E-test. Results: The naive H. pylori isolates had resistance rates for amoxicillin, levofloxacin, clarithromycin and metronidazole of 0%, 9.4%, 10.6% and 26.7%, respectively. An evolutional increase of the primary levofloxacin resistance was observed in isolates collected after 2004, as compared to isolates collected before 2004 (16.3% vs 3.2%, P = 0.003). There was no evolutional increment of the primary clarithromycin resistance. The clarithromycin resistance elevated significantly after a failed clarithromycin-based triple therapy (78.7% vs 10.6%, P < 0.001). The post-treatment isolates remained to have a levofloxacin resistance rate of near 17%, but the levofloxacin-resistant isolates were correlated with a higher incidence of metronidazole resistance (P = 0.023). No strain was found to be resistant to amoxicillin even after eradication failure. Conclusion: The levofloxacin resistance of naive H. pylori remains less than 10% in Taiwan. With relatively lower resistance to levofloxacin than to metronidazole of the H. pylori isolates collected after a failed clarithromycin-based therapy, proton pump inhibitorlevofloxacin-amoxicillin may be an alternative choice to serve as the second-line therapy.
2000
Our purpose was to define the effect of pretreatment Helicobacter pylori resistance to metronidazole or to clarithromycin on the success of antimicrobial therapy. We used 75 key words to perform a literature search in MEDLINE as well as manual searches to identify clinical treatment trials that provided results in relation to H. pylori susceptibility to metronidazole and clarithromycin or both during the period 1984-1997 (abstracts were not included). Meta-analysis was done with both fixed-and random-effect models; results were shown using Galbraith's radial plots. We identified 49 papers with 65 arms for metronidazole (3594 patients, 2434 harboring H. pylori strains sensitive to metronidazole and 1160 harboring resistant strains). Metronidazole resistance reduced effectiveness by an average of 37.7% (95% CI ϭ 29.6-45.7%). The variability in the risk difference for metronidazole was 122.0 to Ϫ90.6 and the chi-square value for heterogeneity was significant (P Ͻ 0.001). Susceptibility tests for clarithromycin were performed in 12 studies (501 patients, 468 harboring H. pylori strains sensitive to clarithromycin and 33 harboring resistant strains). Clarithromycin resistance reduced effectiveness by an average of 55% (95% CI ϭ 33-78%). We found no common factors that allowed patients to be divided into subgroups with additional factors significantly associated with resistance. In conclusion, metronidazole or clarithromycin pretreatment resistant H. pylori are the main factors responsible for treatment failure with regimens using these compounds. If H. pylori antibiotic resistance continues to increase, pretherapy antibiotic sensitivity testing might become necessary in many regions.
Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2003
Aim: To compare the efficacy of different regimens in patients in whom previous Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy has failed. Methods: In this study named StratHegy patients (n ¼ 287) were randomized to receive one of three empirical triple therapy regimens or a strategy based on antibiotic susceptibility. The empirical regimens were omeprazole, 20 mg b.d., plus amoxicillin, 1000 mg b.d., and clarithromycin, 500 mg b.d., for 7 days (OAC 7), clarithromycin, 500 mg b.d., for 14 days (OAC 14) or metronidazole, 500 mg b.d., for 14 days (OAM 14). In the susceptibility-based strategy, patients with clarithromycin-susceptible strains received OAC 14 , whilst the others received OAM 14. The 13 C-urea breath test was performed before randomization and 4-5 weeks after eradication therapy. Results: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the eradication rates for empirical therapies were as follows: OAC 7 , 47.4% (27/57); OAC 14 , 34.5% (20/58); OAM 14 , 63.2% (36/57); it was 74.3% (84/113) for the susceptibilitybased treatment (P < 0.01 when compared with OAC 7 and OAC 14). In patients receiving clarithromycin, the eradication rates were 80% for clarithromycin-susceptible strains and 16% for clarithromycin-resistant strains; in patients receiving OAM 14 , the eradication rates were 81% for metronidazole-susceptible strains and 59% for metronidazole-resistant strains. Conclusions: Eradication rates of approximately 75% can be achieved with second-line triple therapy based on antibiotic susceptibility testing. If susceptibility testing is not available, OAM 14 is an appropriate alternative.