The influence of MDT meetings on use of neo-adjuvant therapy, cancer recurrence and surgical resection rates for rectal cancer (original) (raw)
Related papers
The role of the pathologist in rectal cancer diagnosis and staging and surgical quality assessment
Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2010
Since the introduction of the total mesorectal excision by Heald, many changes in the therapeutic management of rectal cancer have been incorporated. The multidisciplinary approach to colorectal cancer, integrated in a team of different specialists, ensures individualised treatment for each patient with rectal cancer. Therefore the role of the pathologist has acquired an important relevance, not only in diagnosing but also managing and evaluating the surgical specimen. The knowledge of preoperative staging, distance between tumour and anal verge or in patients subjected to a neoadjuvant treatment is necessary for the pathologist to make a detailed, accurate and good-quality report. Parameters such as the macroscopic quality of the mesorectum, the status of the circumferential resection margin and the lymph node harvest are considered basic criteria recommended by the current guidelines for the multidisciplinary team audit.
Oncology letters, 2010
The optimal evaluation of patients with clinically suspected recurrence of rectal carcinoma following initial treatment has yet to be determined. We documented the intensity of the extent-of-disease workup conducted by colorectal surgeons when their patients with rectal carcinoma develop clinical evidence of metastases. A custom-designed questionnaire was mailed to all 1,795 members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Subjects were asked which laboratory tests and imaging studies they would order for one of their own generally healthy patients with a suspicious abnormality found during surveillance testing. The tests most frequently recommended were computed tomography and serum carcinoembryonic antigen level. Few tests were recommended by >90% of respondents. There is no consensus among experts in this common situation.
Pathological assessment of the rectal cancer resection specimen
2009
Summary As it greatly reduces local recurrences, total mesorectal excision (TME) became the standard surgical treatment for rectal cancer. Also, the multidisciplinary team approach contributed to an improved outcome of rectal cancer patients. The pathologist has a crucial role in this process as proper pathological assessment of the TME specimen provides important prognostic information for the oncologist and identifies patients that require further therapy. TME resection specimens require a specialized macroscopic handling and pathological workup. The external surface of the TME resection specimen should be carefully inspected and the quality of the mesorectal excision should be assessed. Adequate evaluation of the mesorectal excision requires examination of both the specimen as a whole (fresh) and transverse slides (after fixation). In addition, careful macroscopic and microscopic evaluation of the completeness of tumor resection is required and the distance of the tumor to the ci...
Post-Surgical Imaging Assessment in Rectal Cancer: Normal Findings and Complications
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Rectal cancer (RC) is one of the deadliest malignancies worldwide. Surgery is the most common treatment for RC, performed in 63.2% of patients. The type of surgical approach chosen aims to achieve maximum residual function with the lowest risk of recurrence. The selection is made by a multidisciplinary team that assesses the characteristics of the patient and the tumor. Total mesorectal excision (TME), including both low anterior resection (LAR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR), is still the standard of care for RC. Radical surgery is burdened by a 31% rate of major complications (Clavien–Dindo grade 3–4), such as anastomotic leaks and a risk of a permanent stoma. In recent years, less-invasive techniques, such as local excision, have been tested. These additional procedures could mitigate the morbidity of rectal resection, while providing acceptable oncologic results. The “watch and wait” approach is not a globally accepted model of care but encouraging results on selected grou...
Cancer, 2012
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) therapy may result in significant tumor regression in patients with rectal cancer. Patients who develop complete tumor regression have been managed by treatment strategies that are alternatives to standard total mesorectal excision. Therefore, assessment of tumor response with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) after neoadjuvant treatment may offer relevant information for the selection of patients to receive alternative treatment strategies. METHODS: Patients with clinical T2 (cT2) through cT4NxM0 rectal adenocarcinoma were included prospectively. Neoadjuvant therapy consisted of 54 grays of radiation and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Baseline PET/CT studies were obtained before CRT followed by PET/CT studies at 6 weeks and 12 weeks after the completion of CRT. Clinical assessment was performed at 12 weeks after CRT completion. PET/CT results were compared with clinical and pathologic data. RESULTS: In total, 99 patients were included in the study. Twenty-three patients were complete responders (16 had a complete clinical response, and 7 had a complete pathologic response). The PET/CT response evaluation at 12 weeks indicated that 18 patients had a complete response, and 81 patients had an incomplete response. There were 5 false-negative and 10 false-positive PET/CT results. PET/CT for the detection of residual cancer had 93% sensitivity, 53% specificity, a 73% negative predictive value, an 87% positive predictive value, and 85% accuracy. Clinical assessment alone resulted in an accuracy of 91%. PET/CT information may have detected misdiagnoses made by clinical assessment alone, improving overall accuracy to 96%. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of tumor response at 12 weeks after CRT completion with PET/ CT imaging may provide a useful additional tool with good overall accuracy for the selection of patients who may avoid unnecessary radical resection after achieving a complete clinical response.
Local staging of rectal cancer: A review of imaging
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2011
During the past decades the management of patients with rectal cancer has substantially changed, with a significant reduction in local recurrence rates following the introduction of better imaging, better surgery, and more efficient neoadjuvant therapy. This review discusses the clinically relevant information radiologists should know on staging of rectal cancer patients. The crucial role of the radiologist in patient management is explained. Furthermore, the evidence for the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in staging and restaging of rectal cancer patients as well as the main features that need to be evaluated when interpreting rectal cancer MRI are given. New diagnostic challenges as a result of new treatment options are also discussed.
Pre-operative imaging of rectal cancer and its impact on surgical performance and treatment outcome
European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO), 2005
To discuss the ability of pre-operative MRI to have a beneficial effect on surgical performance and treatment outcome in patients with rectal cancer. A description on how MRI can be used as a tool so select patients for differentiated neoadjuvant treatment, how it can be used as an anatomical road map for the resection of locally advanced cases, and how it can serve as a tool for quality assurance of both the surgical procedure and overall patient management. As an illustration the proportion of microscopically complete resections of the period 1993-1997, when there was no routine pre-operative imaging, is compared to that of the period 1998-2002, when pre-operative MR imaging was standardized. The proportion of R0 resections increased from 92.5 to 97% (p=0.08) and the proportion of resections with a lateral tumour free margin of >1mm increased from 84.4 to 92.1% (p=0.03). The incomplete resections in the first period were mainly due to inadequate surgical management of unsuspected advanced or bulky tumours, whereas in the second period insufficient consideration was given to extensive neoadjuvant treatment when the tumour was close to or invading the mesorectal fascia on MR. There are good indications that in our setting pre-operative MR imaging, along with other improvements in rectal cancer management, had a beneficial effect on patient outcome. Audit and discussion of the incomplete resections can lead to an improved operative and perioperative management.
Macroscopic and Histological Analysis on Endoscopically Resected Rectal Lesions
ABCD, 2023
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is among the most common malignancies worldwide. Colonoscopy is the examination of choice for the prevention of CRC because of its great diagnostic and, especially, therapeutic capacity in relation to adenomatous lesions. AIMS: This study aimed to analyze the prevalence, macroscopic, and histological characteristics of polypoid rectal lesions resected through endoscopic techniques and assess whether endoscopic therapy is safe and efficient for treating lesions located in the rectum. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study with an analysis of the medical records of all patients undergoing resection of rectal polyps. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients with rectal lesions were evaluated, with 59 men and 64 women of mean age 56 years. All patients underwent endoscopic resection: 70% with polypectomy and 30% with wide mucosectomy. Complete colonoscopy with removal of the entire rectal lesion occurred in 91%, while in 5% the preparation was inadequate and poor clinical conditions were an impeditive factor, and in 4% surgical treatment was indicated because there was an infiltrative lesion with central ulceration. Histological evaluation showed adenomas in 3.25%, hyperplasia in 7.32%, and hamartoma in 0.81%; low-grade dysplasia was identified in 34.96%, high-grade dysplasia in 51.22%, and adenocarcinoma in 1.63%, while one case (0.81%) was classified as erosion. CONCLUSIONS: Polyps in the rectum are common and were found in 37% of these colonoscopies. Adenomas with dysplasia were the most common form of Colorectal cancer. Therapeutic colonoscopy proved to be a safe and efficient method for the complete treatment of rectal lesions.
The role of imaging in the pre-operative staging and post-operative follow-up of rectal cancer
The Surgeon, 2008
Developments in rectal cancer imaging have revolutionised the management of this condition. It has become increasingly important for oncologists and surgeons to have a working insight into radiological assessment in order to make informed clinical decisions. In this context, we discuss the role that imaging plays in the pre-operative staging, post-operative follow-up and therapy of this disease including some novel advances in the Ý eld. Rectal cancer outcomes have improved due to modern surgical techniques, namely total mesorectal excision. Meticulous pre-operative assessment remains key. Conventional TNM staging now appears less crucial compared to assessing tumour distance from the potential plane of surgical resection (particularly the circumferential margin bounded by the mesorectal fascia), and this is reliant on high-quality imaging. Those with margin threatening disease can be offered downstaging chemoradiotherapy to facilitate successful resection. Endorectal ultrasound is useful for T staging and CT for detecting metastases. Malignant lymph node identiÝ cation remains a problem and the use of size and morphological criteria may lead to misdiagnosis. In the post-operative setting, intensive follow-up is associated with improved outcomes but there are many variations in protocols. Most modalities struggle to differentiate tumour from reactive or Ý brotic tissue and functional imaging is being investigated as the solution. PET scanning, particularly PET/CT, has been a major recent development. It has superior utility in detecting recurrent disease, including when conventional imaging is negative, detects occult metastases and may signiÝ cantly enhance our ability to deliver accurate radiotherapy. Imaging has also opened up avenues for guided therapies aimed at ablating liver metastases. Radiofrequency ablation, in particular, is being used successfully and can improve survival of stage four patients.