A study on the accumulation of nine heavy metals in some important fish species from a natural reservoir in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (original) (raw)

Abstract

Concentrations of nine heavy metals (Cr, Cd, Pb, Ni, Cu, Zn, Mn, As, and Fe) in the muscles of four fish species (O. niloticus, C. gariepinus, P. latipinna, and A. d. dispar) collected from the Riyadh River were detected using atomic absorption spectrophotometry in two different seasons in 2012. The concentrations of the studied heavy metals except Cd, Pb, Ni, and Cu in Aphanius d. dispar and Poecilia latipinna were found to be below the safe limits suggested by various authorities. This study also showed that Zn was predominant, while Cr was least accumulated metal in the studied fish muscles. Data demonstrated that there was a significant variation in the heavy-metal concentrations in different fish species in the Riyadh River. Significant positive correlations between heavy-metal concentrations in fish muscles were also found both in pre- and post-monsoon seasons. Metal pollution index was calculated to distinguish polluted from unpolluted ecosystems based upon current knowledge of metal bioavailability, bioconcentration, and bioaccumulation patterns. From the human health point of view, this study showed that there was a possible health risk to consumers due to the intake of Aphanius d. dispar and Poecilia latipinna under the current consumption rate in the country.

Figures (9)

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/ 10. 1080/ 02772248.2014.957485   Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,  and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or  howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arisil out of the use of the Content.

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/ 10. 1080/ 02772248.2014.957485 Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arisil out of the use of the Content.

Table 1. Heavy-metal concentration (mg/kg dry weight) for various fish species from a natural reservoir in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Table 1. Heavy-metal concentration (mg/kg dry weight) for various fish species from a natural reservoir in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Table 2. Comparison of heavy-metal accumulation in fish muscle with reported values from various parts of the world.  Note: ND: not detected; NA: not analyzed. “Values present in the ranges or mean expressed as mg/kg dry weight. >Values present the ranges or mean expressed as mg/kg wet weight.

Table 2. Comparison of heavy-metal accumulation in fish muscle with reported values from various parts of the world. Note: ND: not detected; NA: not analyzed. “Values present in the ranges or mean expressed as mg/kg dry weight. >Values present the ranges or mean expressed as mg/kg wet weight.

Figure 1. Concentration of Cr, Cd, and Pb in white muscle of fishes from a natural reservoir in Riyadh in two different seasons.  Nickel normally occurs at low levels in the environment and produces a variety of pulmo- nary adverse health effects, such as inflammation, fibrosis, emphysema, and tumors (Forti et al. 2011). In this study, the highest amount of Ni was found in P. Jatipinna (7.81 mg/kg) and the lowest amount in C. gariepinus (3.27 mg/kg). The range of Ni concentration in the four species of fish was 3.27—7.81 mg/kg and 2.84—6.11 mg/kg in the pre-monsoon and the post-monsoon, respectively (Figure 2). These values are similar to that reported by Sharif et al. (1993). Ni concentrations in the river water fish except P. /atipinna were below the established safe level of 5.5 mg/kg by the Western Australian Food and Drug Regula- tions (Plaskett and Potter 1979).

Figure 1. Concentration of Cr, Cd, and Pb in white muscle of fishes from a natural reservoir in Riyadh in two different seasons. Nickel normally occurs at low levels in the environment and produces a variety of pulmo- nary adverse health effects, such as inflammation, fibrosis, emphysema, and tumors (Forti et al. 2011). In this study, the highest amount of Ni was found in P. Jatipinna (7.81 mg/kg) and the lowest amount in C. gariepinus (3.27 mg/kg). The range of Ni concentration in the four species of fish was 3.27—7.81 mg/kg and 2.84—6.11 mg/kg in the pre-monsoon and the post-monsoon, respectively (Figure 2). These values are similar to that reported by Sharif et al. (1993). Ni concentrations in the river water fish except P. /atipinna were below the established safe level of 5.5 mg/kg by the Western Australian Food and Drug Regula- tions (Plaskett and Potter 1979).

Figure 2. Concentration of Ni, AS, and Fe in white muscle of fishes from a natural reservoir ir Riyadh in two different seasons.

Figure 2. Concentration of Ni, AS, and Fe in white muscle of fishes from a natural reservoir ir Riyadh in two different seasons.

Zinc is a heavy metal, has a tendency to get bioaccumulated in the fatty tissues of aquatic organisms, including fish, and is known to affect reproductive physiology in fishes. Zinc, an essential micronutrient for both animals and humans, is a cofactor in nearly 300 enzymes in all marine organisms. Zinc toxicity is rare, yet it can be toxic above the limit of 50 mg/kg wet weight in muscle. It appears to have a protective effect against the toxic- ities of both Cd and Pb. Gorell et al. (1997) reported that chronic exposure to Cu and Zn is associated with Parkinson’s disease and these elements might act alone or together over time to initiate the disease (Prasad 1983). Fish are known to have a high threshold level of Zn. The concentration of Zn in the muscles of the sampled fish species in this study ranged from 197.61 to 440.76 mg/kg and 187.51 to 422.61mg/kg as a dry weight basis in the pre-monsoon and the post-monsoon, respectively (Figure 3). The highest amount of Zn was recorded in A. d. dispar (410.71 mg/kg as dry weight) and lowest in C. griepinus (197.61 mg/kg) among the four species of fish in this study. The amount of Zn determined in all the fish samples was below the standard of 1000 mg/kg set by

Zinc is a heavy metal, has a tendency to get bioaccumulated in the fatty tissues of aquatic organisms, including fish, and is known to affect reproductive physiology in fishes. Zinc, an essential micronutrient for both animals and humans, is a cofactor in nearly 300 enzymes in all marine organisms. Zinc toxicity is rare, yet it can be toxic above the limit of 50 mg/kg wet weight in muscle. It appears to have a protective effect against the toxic- ities of both Cd and Pb. Gorell et al. (1997) reported that chronic exposure to Cu and Zn is associated with Parkinson’s disease and these elements might act alone or together over time to initiate the disease (Prasad 1983). Fish are known to have a high threshold level of Zn. The concentration of Zn in the muscles of the sampled fish species in this study ranged from 197.61 to 440.76 mg/kg and 187.51 to 422.61mg/kg as a dry weight basis in the pre-monsoon and the post-monsoon, respectively (Figure 3). The highest amount of Zn was recorded in A. d. dispar (410.71 mg/kg as dry weight) and lowest in C. griepinus (197.61 mg/kg) among the four species of fish in this study. The amount of Zn determined in all the fish samples was below the standard of 1000 mg/kg set by

p: Level of significance. “Season: pre-monsoon. >Fish species: O. niloticus; P. latipinna; C. gariepinus; A. A. dispar.  Table 3. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the effect of inter-season and inter-species on the variation of concentration of various metals in fish muscle.

p: Level of significance. “Season: pre-monsoon. >Fish species: O. niloticus; P. latipinna; C. gariepinus; A. A. dispar. Table 3. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the effect of inter-season and inter-species on the variation of concentration of various metals in fish muscle.

Table 4. Correlation between heavy metals in the fish samples during the two seasons (pre- anc post-monsoon).  of fish muscle burden (Cr, Cd, Pb, Ni, Cu, Zn, Mn, As, and Fe) from the study area (Riyadh River) were selected. Such normalization is used to account for the biological variation in a non-polluted area. Since no significant difference was observed between metal concentration except Cd, Pb, Ni, and Cu in A. d. dispar and O. niloticus in the study area, the sample was pooled so reference values represent the mean of 49 specimens (Table 5). Furthermore, data were logarithmically transformed to achieve normal distribution of the element values and, what is more important, to diminish the more than 1000-fold difference between least and most abundant elements. Without such transfor-  mation, the least abundant elements would be without influence on the results (Julshamn and Grahl-Nielsen 1996).  - ETT 1

Table 4. Correlation between heavy metals in the fish samples during the two seasons (pre- anc post-monsoon). of fish muscle burden (Cr, Cd, Pb, Ni, Cu, Zn, Mn, As, and Fe) from the study area (Riyadh River) were selected. Such normalization is used to account for the biological variation in a non-polluted area. Since no significant difference was observed between metal concentration except Cd, Pb, Ni, and Cu in A. d. dispar and O. niloticus in the study area, the sample was pooled so reference values represent the mean of 49 specimens (Table 5). Furthermore, data were logarithmically transformed to achieve normal distribution of the element values and, what is more important, to diminish the more than 1000-fold difference between least and most abundant elements. Without such transfor- mation, the least abundant elements would be without influence on the results (Julshamn and Grahl-Nielsen 1996). - ETT 1

Note: Reference values mean (n = 49) concentration in pooled sample from Riyadh River.  Table 5. Comparison of the estimated daily intake of heavy metals from fish species studied with the recommended daily dietary intake.

Note: Reference values mean (n = 49) concentration in pooled sample from Riyadh River. Table 5. Comparison of the estimated daily intake of heavy metals from fish species studied with the recommended daily dietary intake.

Key takeaways

sparkles

AI

  1. The study identifies significant metal pollution in four fish species from Riyadh River, particularly Cd, Pb, Ni, and Cu.
  2. A total of nine heavy metals (Cr, Cd, Pb, Ni, Cu, Zn, Mn, As, Fe) were analyzed in fish tissues.
  3. Zn was the most accumulated metal, while Cr showed the least accumulation among the studied species.
  4. The Metal Pollution Index (MPI) of 1.87 indicates that the ecosystem is considered polluted.
  5. Potential health risks exist for consumers of Aphanius d. dispar and Poecilia latipinna due to heavy metal concentrations.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (47)

  1. Ahmad, H.A.H., and S.I. Naim. 2008. "Heavy Metals in Eleven Common Species of Fish from the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea." Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences 1: 13À18.
  2. Akan, J.C., M. Salwa, B.S. Yikala, and Z.M. Chellube. 2012. "Study on the Distribution of Heavy Metals in Different Tissues of Fishes from River Benue in Vinikilang, Adamawa State, Nigeria." British Journal of Applied Science & Technology 2: 311À333.
  3. Amin, M.N., A. Begum, and M.G.K. Mondal. 2011. "Trace Element Concentrations Present in Five Species of Freshwater Fish of Bangladesh." Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 46: 27À32.
  4. ANZFA. 2011. Australian and New Zealand Food Standards Code, Standard 1.4.1 -Contaminants and Natural Toxicants (F2011C00542). Accessed October 12, 2012. http://www.comlaw.gov. au/Details/F2011C00542.
  5. Barlas, N., N. Akbulut, and M. Aydo gan. 2005. "Assessment of Heavy Metal Residues in the Sedi- ment and Water Samples of Uluabat Lake, Turkey." Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 74: 286À293.
  6. Basa, S.P, and R.A. Usha. 2003. "Cadmium Induced Antioxidant Defense Mechanism in Freshwater Teleost Oreochromis mossambicus (Tilapia)." Ecotoxicology Environment Safety 2: 218À221.
  7. Bebbington, G.N., N.J. Mackay, R. Chvojka, R.J. Williams, A. Dunn, and E.H. Auty. 1977. "Heavy Metals, Selenium and Arsenic in Nine Species of Australian Commercial Fish." Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 28: 277À286.
  8. Bowen, H.J.M. 1966. Trace Elements in Biochemistry. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  9. Bruce, A.F., C.F. Rimmon, L.W. Richard, D.W. Robert, and F.G. William. 1975. "Levels of Toxic Metals in Marine Organisms Collected from Southern California Coastal Waters." Environmental Health Perspective 12: 71À76.
  10. Burger, J., and M. Gochfeld. 2005. "Heavy Metals in Commercial Fish in New Jersey." Environ- mental Research 99: 403À412.
  11. Canlı, M, and G. Atlı. 2003. "The Relationships Between Heavy Metal (Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Zn) Levels and the Size of Six Mediterranean Fish Species." Environmental Pollution 121: 129À136.
  12. Carvalho, M.L., S. Santiago, and M.L. Nunes. 2005. "Assessment of the Essential Element and Heavy Metal Content of Edible Fish Muscle." Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 382: 426À432.
  13. Chatterjee, S., B. Chattopadhyay, and S.K. Mukhopadhyay. 2006. "Trace Metal Distribution in Tis- sues of Cichlids (Orechromis niloticus and O. mossambicus) Collected from Wastewater Fed Fishponds in East Calcutta Wetlands a Ramsar Site." Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 36: 119À125.
  14. Chen, C., Y. Qian, Q. Chen, and C. Li. 2011. "Assessment of Daily Intake of Toxic Elements Due to Consumption of Vegetable, Fruits, Meat, and Seafood by Inhabitants of Xiamen." Chinese Journal of Food Science 76: 181À188.
  15. Cheung, K.C., B.H.T. Poon, C.Y. Lan, and M.H. Wong. 2003. "Assessment of Metal and Nutrient Concentration in River Water and Sediment Collected from the Cities in the Pearl River Delta, South China." Chemosphere 52: 1431À1440.
  16. Cliton, H.I., G.U. Ujagwung, and H. Michael. 2008. "Trace Metals in the Tissues and Shells of Tym- panotonus fuscatus var. Radula from the Mangrove Swamps of the Bukuma Oil Field, Niger Delta." European Journal of Scientific Research 24: 468À476.
  17. Cronin, M., I.M. Davies, A. Newton, J.M. Pirie, G. Topping, and S. Swan. 1998. "Trace Metal Con- centrations in Deep Sea Fish from the North Atlantic." Marine Environmental Research 45: 225À238.
  18. De, T.K., M. De, S. Das, R. Ray, and P.B. Ghosh. 2010. "Level of Heavy Metals in Some Edible Marine Fishes of Mangrove Dominated Tropical Estuarine Areas of Hooghly River, North East Coast of Bay of Bengal, India." Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 85: 385À390.
  19. Demirak, A., F. Yilmaz, A. L. Tuna, and N. Ozdemir. 2006. "Heavy Metals in Water, Sediment and Tissues of Leciscus cephalus from a Stream in Southwestern Turkey." Chemosphere 63: 1451À1458.
  20. Dural, M., M.Z.L. Goksu, and A.A. Ozak. 2007. "Investigation of Heavy Metal Levels in Economi- cally Important Fish Species Captured from the Tuzla Lagoon." Food Chemistry 102: 415À421. 14 S. Mahboob et al. Downloaded by [S. Mahboob] at 21:51 11 October 2014 EU Commission Regulation as regards heavy metals. Directive 2001/22/EC, No. 466/2001. EEC as amended by regulation 221/2002/EC.
  21. Forti, E., S. Salovaara, Y. Cetin, A. Bulgheroni, R.W. Pfaller, and P. Prieto. 2011. "In Vitro Evalua- tion of the Toxicity Induced by Nickel Soluble and Particulate forms in Human Airway Epithe- lial Cells." Toxicology in Vitro 25: 454À461.
  22. Gorell, J.M., C.C. Johnson, B.A. Rybicki, E.L. Peterson, G.X. Kortsha, and G.G. Brown. 1997. "Occupational Exposures to Metals as Risk Factors for Parkinson's Disease." Neurology 48: 650À658.
  23. Hanson, N.W. 1973. Official Standardized and Recommended Methods of Analysis. 2nd ed., 270À274 London: The Society for Analytical Chemistry.
  24. Javed, S., and N. Usmani. 2011. "Accumulation of Heavy Metal in Fishes: Human Health Concern." International Journal of Environmental Sciences 2: 659À670.
  25. Jeffree, R.A., M. Warnau, F. Oberhansli, and J.L.Teyssie. 2006. "Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals and Radionuclides from Seawater by Encased Embryos of the Spotted Dogfish Scyliorhinus canicula." Marine Pollution Bulletin 52: 1278À1286.
  26. Jorgensen, L.A., and B. Pedersen. 1994. "Trace Metals in Fish Used for Time Trend Analysis and as Environmental Indicators." Marine Pollution Bulletin 28: 235À243.
  27. Julshamn, K., and O. Grahl-Nielsen. 1996. "Distribution of Trace Elements from Industrial Discharges in the Hardangerfjord, Norway: A Multivariate Data Analysis of Saithe, Flounder and Blue Mussel as Sentinel Organisms." Marine Pollution Bulletin 32: 564À571.
  28. Lakshmanan, R., K. Kesavan, P. Vijayanand, V. Rajaram, and S. Rajagopal. 2009. "Heavy Metals Accumulation in Five Commercially Important Fishes of Parangipettai, Southeast Coast of India." Advanced Journal of Food Science and Technology 1: 63À65.
  29. Nunes, E., A. Cavaco, and C. Carvalho. 2014. "Children's Health Risk and Benefits of Fish Con- sumption: Risk Indices Based on a Diet Diary Follow-up of Two Weeks." Journal of Toxicol- ogy and Environmental Health A 77: 103À114.
  30. Phillips, N.R., M. Stewart, G. Olsen, and C.W. Hickey. 2014. "Human Health Risks of Geother- mally Derived Metals and Other Contaminants in Wild Caught Fish." Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health A 77:346À365.
  31. Pintaeva, E.Ts., S.V. Bazarsadueva, L.D. Radnaeva, E.A. Pertov, and O.G. Smirnova. 2011. "Content and Character of Metal Accumulation in Fish of the Kichera River (a Tributary of Lake of Baikal)." Contemporary Problems of Ecology 4: 64À68.
  32. Plaskett, D., and I.C. Potter. 1979. "Heavy Metal Concentrations in the Muscle Tissue of 12 Species of Teleost from Cockburn Sound, Western Australia." Australian Journal of Marine and Fresh- water Research 30: 607À616.
  33. Prasad, A.S. 1983. "The Role of Zinc in Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease." Clinics in Gastroen- terology 12: 713À741.
  34. Rahman, M.S., A.H. Molla, N. Saha, and A. Rahman. 2012. "Study on Heavy Metals Levels and Its Risk Assessment in Some Edible Fishes from Bangshi River, Dhaka, Bangladesh." Food Chem- istry 134: 1847À1854.
  35. Raphael, E.C., O.C. Augustina, and E.O. Frank. 2011. "Trace Metals Distribution in Fish Tissues, Bottom Sediments and Water from Okumeshi River in Delta State, Nigeria." Environmental Research Journal 5: 6À10.
  36. Reddy, M.S., B. Mehata, S. Dave, M. Joshi, L. Karthikeyan, and V.K.S. Sharma. 2007. "Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals in Some Commercial Fishes and Crabs of the Gulf of Cam- bay, India." Current Science 92: 1489À1491.
  37. Sharif, A.K.M., M. Alamgir, A.I. Mustafa, M.A. Hossain, and M.N. Amin. 1993. "Trace Element Concentrations in Ten Species of Freshwater Fish of Bangladesh." Science of the Total Envi- ronment 138: 117À126.
  38. Shue, M.-F., W.-D. Chen, C.-C. Su, and M.-C. Lu. 2014. "Heavy Metals in Bivalve Mollusks Col- lected from Da-Peng Bay Lagoon in South-Southwestern Taiwan." Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health A 77: 214À222.
  39. Sivaperumal, P., T.V. Sankar, and P.G.V. Nair. 2007. "Heavy Metal Concentrations in Fish, Shell- fish and Fish Products from Internal Markets of India vis-a-vis International Standards." Food Chemistry 102: 612À620.
  40. Teodorovic, N.D., S.B. Maletin, and M.N. Jugovac. 2000. "Metal Pollution Index: Monitoring Based on Trace Metal Accumulation in Fish." TISCIA 32: 55À60.
  41. Turkmen, M., A. Turkmen, Y. Tepe, Y. Tore, and A. Ates. 2009. "Determination of Metals in Fish Species from Aegean and Mediterranean Seas." Food Chemistry 113: 233À237.
  42. Underwood, E.J. 1977. Trace Elements in Human and Animal Nutrition. 4th ed., 258À270. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  43. USFDA. 1993. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance Document for Chromium in Shellfish. Washington, DC: DHHS/PHS/FDA/CFSAN/Office of Seafood.
  44. Vosyliene, M.Z., and A. Jankaite. 2006. "Effect of Heavy Metal Model Mixture on Rainbow Trout Biological Parameters." Ekologija 4: 12À17.
  45. WHO. 1996. Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality. Vol. 2, 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  46. Xie, W.P., K.C. Chen, X.P. Zhu, X.P. Nie, G.M. Zhen, and D.B. Pan. 2010. "Evaluation on Heavy Metal Contents in Water and Fishes Collected from the Waterway in the Pearl River Delta, South China." Journal of Agro-Environment Science 29: 1917À1923.
  47. Ylmaz, A.B., M.K. Sangun, D. Yag, and C. Turan. 2010. "Metals (Major, Essential to Non-essential) Composition of the Different Tissues of Three Demersal Fish Species from Iskenderun Bay, Turkey." Food Chemistry 123: 410À415.