Method of mapping interdisciplinary research and practice at the intersection of biology and design (original) (raw)
Related papers
Design Journal, 2022
All things bio: a conceptual domain-based approach to mapping practice within the landscape of biologically informed disciplines The research presented in this paper tackles the problem of terminological disharmony within biologically informed disciplines (BID). Lexical semantic theories and methods are applied to corpus-based investigations to assess the scope of BID terminology. The results are analysed using statistical and qualitative methods and mapped against known academic domains. The resulting map is evaluated via the analysis and consequent positioning of biologically informed textile research. The findings suggest that the experimental framework embodies an alternative approach to mapping practice within BID landscape that overrides the need for broad, generic terms. Instead presents the work within an established network of theories and concepts with transparent interdisciplinary connections.
The Design Journal
All things bio: a conceptual domain-based approach to mapping practice within the landscape of biologically informed disciplines The research presented in this paper tackles the problem of terminological disharmony within biologically informed disciplines (BID). Lexical semantic theories and methods are applied to corpus-based investigations to assess the scope of BID terminology. The results are analysed using statistical and qualitative methods and mapped against known academic domains. The resulting map is evaluated via the analysis and consequent positioning of biologically informed textile research. The findings suggest that the experimental framework embodies an alternative approach to mapping practice within BID landscape that overrides the need for broad, generic terms. Instead presents the work within an established network of theories and concepts with transparent interdisciplinary connections.
Interdisciplinarity and Collaboration - A Study Focusing on Experienced Biodesign Practitioners
Human Dynamics and Design for the Development of Contemporary Societies
Biodesign is an emerging area in the design field that addresses ecological concerns by working with or learning from organic processes found in living systems. Therefore, biodesign leans on knowledge acquired from other fields, especially sciences. A direct interdisciplinary collaboration between scientists and designers happens very often in biodesign. This paper describes the findings of interviews exploring how biodesigners collaborate with scientists in their activities. The authors conducted semi-structured interviews with ten experienced biodesigners from Europe and South America. After collected, the information of the different interviewees was synthetized and compared, and a thematic analysis was made. The paper identifies and reflects on the designers’ methods to collaboration. It also shows the impact of such partnerships, their relevance to the design field and the specific contribution design brings to science. In addition to the expected impact of science in the desig...
On “Design”: Groundwork for the Study on the Semantics of the Word “Design”
ABSTRACT: This working paper aims to enounce a reflection on the semantics of the word “design” and its consequences in theory and practice. In this sense, I develop a brief study on the historical development of the semantic of design, attending to sudden burst of clades (branches), of new design (or based design) disciplines, and its influence to this theme, with the analogy to evolution and its taxonomic methods of classification. In the end I present future orientations to this study and its future aims.
Transdisciplinary Design Practices in Education: A Complex Search for Innovation in Nature
DS 95: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2019), University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. 12th -13th September 2019, 2019
Working across, between or even beyond established disciplines necessitates effective collaboration, and there are well acknowledged models of associating business and science. Evidence suggests a worldwide increase of cross-disciplinary working as partnerships transcend the confines of predefined and historical silos. However, associations between design, engineering and many branches of life science, lags. While there is increasing interest in bioinspired design, formalised methods are not, as yet, well established, adopted in industry or part of design curricula. Biomimicry as a route to innovation is currently thought to rely on the collaboration between the diverse disciplines of Biology, Design and Engineering in order to be successful. However, current academic research into multidisciplinary collaboration within Engineering and Product Design education appears limited. This study describes the findings of a small-scale research project exploring the attitudes of professionals in relevant fields regarding interdisciplinary collaboration with a specific focus on biomimicry. The work compares current views on collaborative work in biomimicry with the opinions of an expert panel. Two rounds of questionnaires utilising the Delphi method were used to gain insights from an anonymised panel of experts. The research concluded that while biologist/designer collaboration can spark imagination and enthusiasm, it is a challenging process and its efficacy will depend upon understanding and motivation from the onset. The discussion and conclusions focus on the need for more efficient methods to encourage successful collaboration across life sciences and the impact on design education at HE and beyond. Importantly it draws attention to possible attitudes of indifference towards inter and transdisciplinary partnerships.
Pesquisa Acadêmica em áreas de Prática Projetual Academic Research in areas of Design Practice
2007
Research funding bodies and higher level education institutes with an interest in academic research strive to define what research in design areas is, and how it can be identified and evaluated. It is common that the academic community adopts a traditional definition of research, usually one that has its origins in the scientific model of research. This means that the traditional scientific model of research is generally regarded as the dominant one in the academic arena. However, it can be anticipated that a scientific model might not offer the ideal structure for defining what is research in the humanities (cf. Gibbons et al, 1994).
Textile Theory: do we need it?
The Seventh ICDHS Conference Design and Craft: a History of Convergences and Divergences, edited by Javier Gimeno-Martinez & Fredie Floré, 2010
Textile Theory: do we need it? Textiles are ubiquitous, covering our bodies, adorning our homes and structuring many of the networks that make up contemporary communication. Considering this ubiquity, it is surprising that textile theory continues to be an under-explored area of academic inquiry. Where critical writing does exist about textiles, it tends to emerge from a variety of disciplines, deploying a range of critical approaches. This paper proposes a discussion of my interest in mainstream journalism and fiction as tools for discussion about contemporary textile practice. The American Janet Koplos has written: “If I were looking for a “better” crafts criticism, I would not be looking for theorizing borrowed from literature or other fields. I would be wishing not for more jargon for the right ordinary language to do the trick. I would not be hoping for critical infallibility. I would simply want better writing, showing thought and care.” My interest in fiction is less about “theorizing borrowed from literature” as Koplos warns, than it is a search for writing about textiles that shows “thought and care”, is unselfconscious, and free from the often unhelpful parameters of academic regulations. In this paper, I propose a discussion of three types of critical writing about contemporary textile practice: 1) my experience as a freelance writer for a number of non-academic textile publications 2) my ongoing interest in the relationship between fiction as a form of critical writing about craft 3) my current research editing a reader of critical writing about textiles. Each provides there own potentials, as well as pitfalls in the contribution they can make to design criticism today. But together these three approaches may begin to suggest a new more adaptable and accessible identity for the lost profession of the design critic.