Recusatio as Political Theatre: Horace's Letter to Augustus (original) (raw)
Among the most potent devices that Roman emperors had at their disposal to disavow autocratic aims and to put on display the consensus of ruler and ruled was the artful refusal of exceptional powers, or recusatio imperii. The practice had a long history in Rome prior to the reign of Augustus, but it was Augustus especially who, over the course of several decades, perfected the recusatio as a means of performing his ongoing hesitancy towards power. The poets of the Augustan period were similarly well practiced in the art of refusal, writing dozens of poetic recusationes that purported to refuse offers urged upon them by their patrons, or by the greater expectations of the Augustan age, to take on projects that exceeded their powers or the limits of a refined and unassuming style. It is the purpose of this paper to put the one type of refusal side-by-side with the other, in order to show to what extent the refusals of the Augustan poets are informed not just by aesthetic principles that derive, most obviously, from Callimachus, but by the many, high-profile acts of denial that were performed as political art by the emperor himself. The paper thus concerns ‘the culture of refusal’ in ancient Rome, analyzing the kind of cultural work that gets done by saying ‘no’ to big projects and to big powers in ways that are highly stylized, oft-repeated, and encoded as specifically Roman (the mos maiorum). Key texts in this discussion are Augustus’ Res Gestae, and Horace’s epistle to Augustus.
Related papers
Et Sine Auctore Notissimi Uersus: Unauthored Poetry and Rome's Authoritarian Turn
Unspoken Rome. Absence in Latin Literature and its Reception, 2021
This paper engages with the anonymous verses quoted by Suetonius in his Lives of the Caesars. By analyzing several poems concerning Julius Caesar, Augustus and Tiberius, it shows how these powerful men had had to deal with an anonymous (and pseudonymous) anti-propaganda which involves different social backgrounds cooperating together from the stage of composition to that of circulation. The presence of these voices offers a means of testing the authoritarian climate and the different reactions between the three figures of power considered above.
Virtue, Consensus, and Authority without Tradition: Cicero’s De imperio Cn. Pompei
Cicero’s first speech as praetor before a contio meeting, De Imperio Cn. Pompei, gives us a sense of the early stages of the development of imperial metaphor. De imp. Cn. Pomp. is an ingenious attempt at articulating a vocabulary of consensus for its audience, which consisted of a large swath of Roman inhabitants in addition to the reading public cultivated by Cicero. It reveals to us the creation of several different areas of public discourse. Many biographers of Cicero and historians of the Roman republic seek the impulses toward their creation in the socio-economic position of Cicero himself, and in his own original assimilation of Greek rhetorical techniques to Roman circumstances. But this explanation is clearly insufficient to explain the public appeal of the extension of the idea of personal patronage (clientela) into the realm of foreign affairs, for instance, and its institutionalization in the late republic and early empire. Certainly, emphasizing the virtus and auctoritas of Rome as compared with its foreign peers and allies was one important way in which the Roman ruling class could legitimate its own imperialist ideology. But the appeal of the argument was also an eminently popularis one. Metaphorical claims to ancestry and precedent consequently play a prominent role in the opening speech of Cicero’s praetorship: they provide a “pre-text” for Roman imperium as it was embodied by first the late republican warrior-generals, and then the emperor himself. They lay the necessary rhetorical groundwork for linking populist claims to imperial politics. This paper will concentrate on three of these: the relationship of Roma/socius as imitative of the traditional Roman relationship of patronus/cliens; the idea that virtus historically grounds the claim of the Roman people to rule over groups that might alternatively have been imagined as peers or rivals within the world of the Hellenistic Mediterranean; and the idea that there is a kind of auctoritas that belongs to the Roman people as a whole.
Grattius and Augustus: Hunting for an Emperor
Grattius: Hunting an Augustan Poet, 2018
This paper focuses on the poem’s potential for political resonance. It argues that the craft of hunting is, through extensive use of anthropomorphic language, subtly configured to promote Augustan-style leadership and to celebrate the Roman empire, albeit set within a divine framework that plays out the implications of Augustus’ (at times radical) programme of religious reform.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.