Kova su žodžiais. Czeslawo Miloszo ir Tomo Akviniečio atvejis (original) (raw)

2015

Abstract

Miłosz declares himself as a Roman Catholic and did not want to be called "a Catholics writer". Nevertheless he declares that the best in his poetry comes from Tomas Aquinas philosophy. At the same time poet emphasises opposite of Good and evil as the fundaments of reality. This means that Miłosz do not want to construct a harmony, or theodicy. That is why Miłosz expressed his view not directly but "polyphonically" - using such authors like emmanuel swedenborg, william Blake and simone weil. The recognition of two self-contained origins (Good and evil) puts Miłosz more close to Manichaean doctrine. Nevertheless, Manichaean pessimism is alien to him. Miłosz finds a balance to that pessimistic position in religious thinking of 17th century English poet and mystical writer Thomas Traherne. The background of Traherne's reflection is a notion of "Earth-Paradise". These aspects even more expose conflicting nature of reality. Miłosz’s conception of reality...

Lina Vidauskytė hasn't uploaded this paper.

Let Lina know you want this paper to be uploaded.

Ask for this paper to be uploaded.