Students’ Perceptual Learning Style Preferences, Their Achievement, and Teachers’ Teaching Styles (With Particular Reference to Tana Beles Girls’ Boarding School, Pawe Woreda) (original) (raw)

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the dominant students' learning styles preferences, their achievement, and teachers' teaching style preferences in Tana Beles Girls' Boarding School. Comparison was made between (i) students' perceptual learning style preferences' and their achievement. (ii) students' learning style preferences with respect to their teachers' teaching style preferences. The teaching styles and learning styles mentioned are based upon Reid (1987) consisting of visual, auditory, tactile, group, and individual. This study is a survey method using 4point Likert Scale questionnaire as the instrument. The obtained Cronbach alpha coefficients were 0.78 and 0.75 for teachers' and students' questionnaires respectively. Comprehensive sample technique was employed in the study. The data were analyzed using SPSS. Mean, standard deviation, ANOVA, Chi-square were used to detect the significances of the data. The result indicated that both students' learning styles and teacher's teaching styles did not match. The majority of students are group learners but the teachers preferred tactile teaching style.. Based on the findings, there were also the relationship between students' learning style preferences and their academic performances. This indicated that teaching styles can make students to promote their own learning success, which include a vast number of teaching techniques so as to make learning easier, fast, more enjoyable, effective, and to increase the performance. In the finding, students whose learning style was tactile scored good result since the teachers also preferred tactile teaching style. In all academic classrooms, no matter what the subject is, there are students with multiple learning styles. Everyday teachers thus should make instructional decisions before, during, and after meeting the students and these decisions should lead the teachers to adapted learning/teaching styles to accommodate all students in the classroom.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (16)

  1. Bada, Z.and Okan, Z. (2000).Students' Language Learning Preferences. Retrieved on Jan.10, 2010 from Journal, Vol.4 No.3 May.Turky: Cukuova University.
  2. Capel, S. et .al (2001).Learning to teach in the Secondary School: A Composition to School experience. Great Britain: Bell and Bain Ltd.
  3. Elliott, N.S. et.al. (2000). Educational Psychology. U. S. A.: McGraw-Hill. Companies Inc.
  4. Felder, R.M. (1996). Matters of styles. American Society for Engineering Education Prism, 6(4), 18-23. Retrieved on Dec.1, 2010 from http://www2.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/LS- Prism.htm.
  5. Gearheart, R.B.et.al. (1988). The Exceptional Student in the Regular Classroom. U .S. A: Merrill Publishing Company.
  6. Hart, S. (1996).Differentiation and the Secondary Curriculum. New York: Routedge.
  7. Hendrich, J. and Strange, T. (1989).Do actions speak louder than words? Effects of the functional use of language on dominate sex role behavior in boys and girls. Norman: Oklahoma University Press.
  8. Lefrancois, R. (2000). Psychology for teaching .U.S.A: Wadsworth, a division of Thomson.
  9. Nunan, D. (2003).Practical English Language Teaching (ed). U. S. A.: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
  10. Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. Retrieved on Jan.10, 2010 from TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 21, No.1.
  11. Riazi, A. and Riasati, J.M. (2007). Language Learning Style Preferences. Students Case Study of Shiraz EFL Institutes: Retrieved on March 29, 2010 from the Asian EFL Journal Quarterly Volume 9, Issue 1.
  12. Severiens, S.A. and Ten Dam, G. (1997).Gender and Gender identity differences in learning styles. Retrieved on Jan. 10, 2010 from Educational Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 1 and 2. http://dare.uva.nl/document/44649.
  13. Shrum, J.L. and Gilsan, E.W. (2000).Teachers hand book: Contextualize Language Instruction. (2 nd ed.).Boston: Heinlein, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
  14. Smih, L. and Renzulli, J. (1984).Learning style Preference: A Practical approach for classroom teacher. Retrieved on Apr. 19, 2010 from. Theory into Practice 23:45-50
  15. Williams, M. and Burden, L.R. (1997).Psychology for Language Teaching. A social constructivist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Zhenhui, R. (2001). Matching teaching styles with learning styles for ESL/EFL instruction. Retrieved on March 29, 2010 from The internet TESL Journal, Vol.VII, No.7