Ideologie und Organisation (original) (raw)
Related papers
If, to speak about organization, we accept the postulate that there are " good reasons " to speak about it, it is then necessary to investigate the universe of ideology and the way by which models plunge their roots in ideology as well as they create a coherent world. Ideology, as justification, produces representations. What is in question here, is the kind of deformation carried by representations. They produce a structure of the world, the validation of which may be an object of science seen as the construction of a truth in a project of "knowledge" of this world. The concept of ideology is particularly difficult. It benefits and suffers from two major influences in its foundations: that of a political perspective with Marx and Engels and that of the sociological reaction (from Max Weber to Raymond Boudon and Pierre Bourdieu). Ideology as an " attractor " raises the question of " ultimate references ".
The definition of organisational culture and its historical origins
History of European Ideas, 1994
THE THEORETICAL GENESIS OF "ORGANISATION" AND "CULTURE" IN KANT It is often somewhat ridiculous to speak of a definition as #redefinition, as if a field of research could be delineated by only one sentence. A sentence is not a language, and particularly in the humanities I do not think that such definitions even have any practical use. Meanwhile there is a paradox between the "anything goes" approach in the search for a concept of what in the eighties became widely and popularly known as "organisational culture", and the peculiar fact that the first conceptualisations of human "organisation" as well as of modern "culture" are to be found in the same work, that is, Immanuel Kant's Kritik der Urteilskraft (1790). That book is one of the most outstanding philosophical monuments in the history of mankind, and is extremely complex. In his little 1783 article, "Answering the question: What is Enlightenment?', Kant was the first to schematise what the neo-Kantian Max Weber later called "the model of bureaucracy". Kant's article displayed, foremost, a model showing the conditions necessary for freedom, justice and public reasoning. Its thoughts would later be turned into a code of "Freedom through Organisation" by Kant's younger contemporaries, the leading ministers Johann Gottlieb Svarez, Klaus von Stein and Klaus von Hardenberg. In The Critique of Judgement we do not find short definitions of "organisation" and "culture" which in any easy way serve the purposes of organisational sociology or historical sociology. Therefore I will first try to construct such workable definitions. In place of a difficult discussion of the validity of Kant's theory of organisation and culture, I will expound some of the central features of its origins, its genesis. My overall point is that the second half of the eighteenth century has been and is still formative not only for theoretical social research but also for the modern mind and organisation. Parameters laid down a long time ago should be reflected upon or even changed when organisations seek to change themselves in light of their supposed culture. The Critique of Judgement has two parts. The first concerns how extremely subjective aesthetic judgements are interwoven in communication (Mitteilung). Kant was the first to distinguish conventional "civilisation" from the more reflective or cultivated "culture", so to speak, in his programme article "Ideen zu
In this piece, the author argues that Organization Studies, like other academic journals, is not a sovereign subject able to chart its own path and make sovereign decisions on its strategy and direction. Instead, the journal is seen as embedded in complex networks of institutions and practices over which the editorial team has limited control; chief among them are the conventions of peer review, the proliferation of academic journals, the escalating pressures on academics to publish and the ceaseless struggle to improve ranking and citations. A useful way of looking at the journal is as a place where, following different institutional practices, ideas arrive, settle and meet each other, sometimes fight it out, or, more often than not decide to coexist in a civilized and polite way. Like the spaces of large cities, journals too become spaces crucial for the formation of individual and group identities, something that is accompanied by much agonizing about quality, acceptance, purity, contamination and even annihilation. The paper concludes with some reflections on the ethic of rational critique, at once the bedrock of academic discourse but also capable of inflicting much damage and of prematurely closing promising lines of inquiry. The author proposes that this ethic must be complemented by an ethic of care which stems from a recognition of fallibility and limits to our rationality. An ethic of care must inform not only the interactions among a journal’s different stakeholders but may spread to an attitude of stakeholders towards the journal itself, an attitude that approaches the journal as a valued intellectual space to be nurtured and cared for. Keywords: journal strategy, academic publishing, academic identity, peer review, ethics of criticism, ethic of care
ASEJ Scientific Journal of Bielsko-Biala School of Finance and Law, 2019
This paper provides an overview of how international organizations were formed, for what purposes and how their structure has been changed. The distinction between formal organizational studies and studies of international organizations is minimal, because both help to widen the idea of creating an original position for better combinations of favorable circumstances or situations in human affairs. The chapter will explain, the origin of the term international organization (OR); historical roots of or studies; and define or; analyze the types of ORs in the contemporary world; reveals the relationship between the international relation (IR) and regime theories application in the OR’s studies; and the impact of the globalization. The chapter also unveils the relationships between organizational sociology and OR and finally it gives a general outline on the application institution theory in the study of OR following a brief summary. Organizations have the ability of inspiring and bringi...
ASEJ Scientific Journal of Bielsko-Biala School of Finance and Law, 2019
This paper provides a pedagogical overview of how international organizations were formed, for what purposes and how their structure has been changed. The distinction between formal organizational studies and studies of international organizations is minimal, because both help to widen the idea of creating an original position for better combinations of favorable circumstances or situations in human affairs. The chapter will explain, the origin of the term international organization (OR); historical roots of or studies; and define or; analyze the types of ORs in the contemporary world; reveals the relationship between the international relation (IR) and regime theories application in the OR’s studies; and the impact of the globalization. The chapter also unveils the relationships between organizational sociology and OR and finally it gives a general outline on the application institution theory in the study of OR following a brief summary. Organizations have the ability of inspiring...
Consider, as a final example, the attitude of contemporary American liberals to the unending hopelessness and misery of the lives of the young blacks in American ciries. Do we say that these people must be helped because they are our fellow human beings? We may, but it is much more persuasive, morally as well as politically, to describe them as our fellow Americans -to insist that it is outrageous that an American should live wichout hope.