The 2008 Elections In The United States And Discourse Theory: Can Obama’s Victory Be Explained Through Poststructuralist Discourse Analysis? (original) (raw)
Related papers
A Critical Discourse Analysis of Barack Obama " s Speeches
The Critical Discourse Analysis is often applied to analyze political discourse including the public speech, in which the speaker wins favorite response from the audience. This paper, based on Critical Discourse Analysis theory and Systematic Functional Linguistics, analyzes Barack Obama's presidential speeches mainly from the point of transitivity and modality, in which we can learn the language how to serve the ideology and power. Moreover, we can have a better understanding of the political purpose of these speeches.
FROM CANDIDATE TO PRESIDENT OBAMA’S DISCOURSE TWO YEARS LATER
The article explores Barack Obama’s most notable speeches after becoming president. The authors intend to write a sequel to their 2009 paper Yes We Can: A New American Identity in the Speeches of Barack Obama, which looked at Obama’s campaign discourse, and investigate if his rhetoric has changed in the first half of his mandate.
Critical Discourse Analysis of Obama's Political Discourse
This paper examines the persuasive strategies of President Obama's public speaking as well as the covert ideology of the same, enshrined in his inaugural address. Our analysis is grounded in Norman Fairclough's assumptions in critical discourse analysis, claiming that "ideologies reside in texts" that "it is not possible to 'read off' ideologies from texts" and that "texts are open to diverse interpretations" .The selected corpus' ideological and persuasive components are assessed, thus revealing Obama's persuasive strategies.
Rhetorical and metatextual features in political discourse: the case of Obama's speech on race
Elia Estudios De Linguistica Inglesa Aplicada, 2011
El objetivo de este artículo es llevar a cabo un análisis de las características gramaticales y metatextuales en el famoso discurso de Obama sobre la raza del año 2008. Este discurso fue pronunciado en un momento crítico de su campaña y su mensaje podía significar seguir con opciones de convertirse en el futuro Presidente o, por el contrario, perder cualquier credibilidad en el electorado. En este discurso él no solo tiene que decir su opinión sobre quien fuera su asesor espiritual durante varias décadas, el Reverendo Wright y sus polémicas palabras sino, además, su propia opinión del tema. Con este trabajo intento concluir con las razones por las que los discursos de Obama durante la campaña fueron tan aplaudidos por su contenido y los recursos gramaticales utilizados convirtiéndolos en mensajes bien construidos que hace que se consideren ejemplos de buenos discursos. Palabras clave: Características gramaticales metatextuales, discurso político The aim of this paper is to analyse the grammatical and metatextual features in Obama's famous speech on race given in 2008. It was delivered at a critical moment of his campaign and his message Estudios de lingüística inglesa aplicada Conchi Hernández-Guerra ELIA 11, 2011, pp. 119-146 could determine whether he would maintain the option of running for the Presidency of the country or, on the contrary, reduce his credibility with the voters. In this speech he has to discuss not only his opinion of his spiritual leader, the Reverend Wright, over several decades and the latter's polemical words but also give his own opinion about the subject. With this paper I try to consider why Obama's speeches in the campaign are so celebrated for their content and for the grammatical resources used to compose a well-combined message which is recognized as an example of excellent oratory.
2014
Drawing on overarching methodological frameworks of Hallidayan grammatical metaphor, Fairclough's perspective on critical discourse analysis and rhetoric, this study attempts to posit a novel, integrated and practical approach to political, the media, advertisement and other discourses. To this end and based on the proposed approach, it aims to critically and eclectically exemplify and dissect three speeches delivered by Mr. Barack Obama, former president of the US, to first manifest the integrated approach practicality and adeptness through analysis; then by virtue of analysis to unveil how language is manipulated and distorted by orators in order to convey seamlessly intended messages and political creeds to the audience. Surveying recent annals of literature, to date no one has conducted an integrated study applying these disciplines in an individual paper and this study as a trial one can be useful for upcoming research. The analysis depicts practicality and efficiency of the integrated approach and displays that the speeches abound with nominalizations, modal verbs, parallelisms and antitheses. Furthermore, there are some three-part listing, the use of passivization, quotations and modality metaphors. Therefore, a tendency to utilize more nominalizations, parallelism and other devices by the speaker can be a fundamental reason for making his political language more powerful, impressive, persuasive and ambiguous as well.
Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 2013
A political discourse contains some features that must be constant in them to be recognized and understood by the audience as such but, at the same time, must fulfill the purpose of transmitting the message aimed in that venue with a personal and original style. This is commonly done through layers of direct or subtle content. One of the most important political orators in the twentieth century is undoubtedly President Barack Obama. Even his detractors recognize the high level of his speeches. The aim of this paper is to do a comprehensive analysis of the speech uttered by the President of the United States at Strasbourg, France in a very delicate political moment to reveal the rhetorical and intertextual means used to fulfill the purpose. The reason for his visit to Europe in 2009 was to explain the needs for the collaboration in the Afghan war in a moment in which Europe was against this participation.
2020
This paper examines the art of linguistic spin in three popular speeches given by Barack Obama during October 2, 2002 to February 5, 2008. Obama's linguistic spin has been approached through the model of transitivity systems proposed by Halliday. The analysis and interpretation reveal the way he became successful in persuading the people gather around him. These linguistic features have been taken as tools for analysis as these relate closely to the ideational function of language, quite suitable for the analysis and interpretation of a political discourse since political discourse also deals with the ideational function. The results of the study show that Obama uses material processes of action and event as well as mental process of affection to physically gather the people around him. He uses relational processes as well to create his positive image in the minds of people. He seems much interested in using circumstance of location, both spatial and temporal, and circumstance of reason to make his account objective and reliable.
2011
This paper examines the art of linguistic spin in three popular speeches given by Barack Obama during October 2, 2002 to February 5, 2008. Obama's linguistic spin has been approached through the model of transitivity systems proposed by Halliday. The analysis and interpretation reveal the way he became successful in persuading the people gather around him. These linguistic features have been taken as tools for analysis as these relate closely to the ideational function of language, quite suitable for the analysis and interpretation of a political discourse since political discourse also deals with the ideational function. The results of the study show that Obama uses material processes of action and event as well as mental process of affection to physically gather the people around him. He uses relational processes as well to create his positive image in the minds of people. He seems much interested in using circumstance of location, both spatial and temporal, and circumstance o...
Discourse Analysis of the Political Speeches
2020
Political Discourse Analysis" or "PDA" plays crucial roles aiming to embrace audience's attention and motivation. By means of political discourse, the constructed contexts revealed the current information of matters purposively however the PDA isn't the merely methods of how to comprehend political language being communicated. This study aims to explore the US political speeches by two historical orators. The aim of the report is to analyze the selected political speeches by Martin Luther King, and the president of the USA, Barack Obama. The research questions are: 1) what are lexical features emerged from PDA and 2) What kinds of powers are reflected from the US political discourses. The result of the descriptive analysis divulges the similarity and diversity of the linguistic elements proposed through the three linguistic aspects: 1] cohesion, 2] pragmatic, and 3] power. The important textual examination in theses selected works is the benefit for the variety of crucial linguistic elements interpreted and explained systematically. It is said that PDA directly proclaims various dimensions of political discourse.