A Close Reading of the Technoscientific Transformations and Blurring of the Boundaries between Humanity, Animality, and Monstrosity in Four Contemporary Science Fiction Novels (original) (raw)
Related papers
Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 2022
This article reads two narratives of catastrophe, Octavia Butler’s “Speech Sounds” (1983) and Ted Chiang’s “The Great Silence” (2015), in an attempt to explore how their concern with disaster destabilizes the binary human/nonhuman. Conjuring up visions of transformation and extinction before and after catastrophe, the stories interrogate humanist accounts of subjectivity through their focus on language and consciousness, prompting us to rethink the ontological divide between the human and the animal. This interrogation is carried out not only at the level of thematics, but also at a formal level, through the techniques of defamiliarization and extrapolation as well as through the choice of narrative voice and focalization. Thus, the two stories engage with some of the key issues addressed by the discourses originating from the fields of animal studies and critical posthumanism, which are currently gaining momentum in philosophy and literary criticism in the context of the Posthuman turn. As will be contended, the stories send a powerful message about the boundary between self and other, highlighting the necessity of a shift toward a posthumanist ethics of affinity.
New Horizons in English Studies, 2020
The so-called animal turn in literature has fostered the evolution of animal studies, a discipline aimed at interrogating the ontological, ethical, and metaphysical implications of animal depictions. Animal studies deals with representation and agency in literature, and its insights have fundamental implications for understanding the conception and progression of human-animal interactions. Considering questions raised by animal studies in the context of literary depictions of animals in science fiction, this article threads John Berger’s characterization of the present as a time of radical marginalization of animals in his essay “Why Look at Animals?” through two highly influential science fiction texts: H. G. Wells’s The Island of Doctor Moreau and Philip K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?. Applying Berger’s reasoning to these two novels raises issues of personhood, criteria for ontological demarcation, and the dynamics of power, providing an opportunity to clarify, mod...
Human, super-human, anti-human: The posthuman deep future in evolutionary science fiction
World literature studies, 2021
The subject of creative evolution1 in recent science fiction is mostly presented in the near future with “cyberware” and “bioware” as basic tools for enhancing the body and the mind.* This individualistic and hedonistic rendition of transhumanist ideals, often accompanied by a dystopian take on the socio-economic consequences of techno-enhancements, contradicts the original transhumanist agenda set by Julian Huxley, the founder of the movement, for whom the main goal was “a betterment” of all humankind (1957). it also stands in contrast to current discussions about the possible future within posthumanist and anthropocene studies. By questioning the central position of humans on a symbolic, biological, and planetary level, the very position of humans among other species, and in nature itself, is being redefined. Principal questions arise: “What does it mean to be human?”, “What are special and truly unique human traits?”, and “Which of them make Homo sapiens stronger and which make H...
2018
We now live in a world filled to capacity with advancing technologies which have massive impacts on our lives and causes us to become dependent on them day by day. Science Fiction, as a literary genre, has always gone with in tandem with technological advances hand in hand. A movement called transhumanism exists which aims to make humans immortal and transform them into less vulnerable living machines. Two significant concepts in this movement are transhuman and posthuman which are applied as conceptual frameworks in this study to analyse the technological transformation of humans in four selected 21st century Science Fiction novels, namely Mindscan (2005) by Robert J. Sawyer (b.1960), Machine Man (2011) by Max Barry (b.1973), Amped (2012) by Daniel H. Wilson (b.1978), and The Transhumanist Wager (2013) by Zoltan Istvan (b.1973). As for the relationship between these two concepts, transhuman is defined in this study as a modified form of human by which new human is still biological,...
The Primitive, Technology, Horror: A Posthuman Biology
Recent works have explored the concept of posthumanism as a radical decentring of the human, humanism and the humanities in the wake of the complexificaiton of technology and systems, and new insight into nonhuman life (Pettman, 2011; Wolfe, 2009). In this article, we argue that posthumanism is not just an epistemology (Wolfe, 2009), but an aesthetic that blends three elements – the primitive, technology and horror. The interrelation of these three elements produces an aesthetic sensibility, that says three things about non-humanist conceptions of life. First, we draw attention to metamorphosis as an engine that encourages the viewer to recognise life not as being, but as perpetual becoming. However, as an antidote to the liberatory promises of ‘flow’, we specifically argue for a distinction between morphing and mutating, showing how each articulates opposing fantasies of posthumanism. Second, the concept of primal technology is introduced, which injects the humanist understanding of technology with an alternative, subterranean and posthuman supplement. Third, proto-atavism introduces the concept that multiple paradigms of life exist on the peripheries of humanist life. Ancient and future evolutionary traits exist in the present – both in the aesthetic imagination and in everyday life. Ultimately, we work towards a more wide-ranging idea – a posthuman biology – an ethical imperative which reminds us that, in a technological age, life is no longer containable in ‘simple’ life.
Figurations of Posthumanity in Contemporary Science/Fiction – all too human(ist)? (2005)
Revista canaria de estudios ingleses , 2005
Introducing the terms "science/fiction" and "imagineering", the essay aims to move beyond the "two cultures" divide and emphasises instead the interdependency between science and literature or, more specifically, between "real science" and "science fiction". It argues that technoscientific visions are indebted to narrative imaginings and that the promises of technoscience, in turn, influence individual and collective fantasies. The analytical focus is on imagineerings of the posthuman body or subject in various types of science/fiction. In order to challenge the orthodoxy of posthumanism's progressive trajectory, these figurations will be scrutinised in view of underlying liberal-humanist and, hence, androcentric, ethnocentric and anthropocentric assumptions.