Beyond Sustainability Reporting: Integrated Reporting is Practiced, Required & More Would Be Better (original) (raw)

Abstract

Ninety-five percent of the Global Fortune 250, along with thousands of other companies worldwide, voluntarily report on their environmental, societal, and economic impacts. The practice is variously known as sustainability reporting, corporate responsibility (CR) reporting, corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting, citizenship reporting, environmental, societal, and governance (ESG) reporting, or triple bottom line (TBL) reporting. A growing number of countries now mandate or provide guidance related to this practice to some extent. For example, in the United States, * The authors would like to thank Linda Lowson, Esq., Founder and CEO of the Global ESG Regulatory Academy™ and CSR Insight™ LLC, for contributing her findings regarding SEC noncompliance on ESG issue SEC reporting requirements. 1060 2013] BEYOND SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING 1061 the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act explicitly requires publicly traded companies to disclose data related to their supply chains of certain minerals. Should greater disclosures be explicitly and specifically required? Should companies begin greater disclosures for their own benefit? Do the basic principles of existing laws already require a greater amount of disclosure in our current context? If so, what would be gained from greater and more explicit guidance from legislators or regulators such as the SEC? We seek to answer these questions. This article summarizes the history, current state, and motivations and impacts of sustainability reporting and regulation-by-disclosure, along with data on the present needs of investors and recent market trends. It also reviews the definition of materiality under U.S. securities laws and regulations-the key to understanding what data a company must publicly disclose for the benefit of investors. Based on our review of recent history, the current needs of investors, and the definition of materiality, it is clear that existing laws and related rules already require greater disclosure of data on environmental and societal impacts than commonly understood. The article concludes with recommendations for managers, their attorneys, accountants, and policymakers, and provokes further questions for constructive scholarship in the fields of business and law.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (44)

  1. KPMG INT'L SURVEY 2011, supra note 11, at 16.
  2. GRI, Sustainability Reporting 10 Years On 1, available at https://web.archive.org/web/ 20100107174557/http://www.globalreporting.org/NR/rdonlyres/430EBB4E-9AAD-4CA1-9478- FBE7862F5C23/0/Sustainability_Reporting_10years.pdf (last visited Jan. 28, 2014). 16. Id. at 2.
  3. Id.
  4. GRI and UN Global Compact Forge New Alliance, UN GLOBAL COMPACT WEBSITE, June 24, 2010, http://www.unglobalcompact.org/news/50-06-24-2010 (last visited Jan. 11, 2014).
  5. KPMG INT'L SURVEY 2011, supra note 11, at 23. KPMG's description is that integrated reporting "has exploded onto the CR agenda." Id.
  6. INT'L INTEGRATED REPORTING COMMITTEE, http://www.theiirc.org/ (last visited Jan. 11, 2014).
  7. Id.
  8. Schapiro, Statement Before Open Commission, supra note 47.
  9. Nickolas M. Boecher, SEC Interpretive Guidance for Climate-Related Disclosures, Fea- ture, 10 SUSTAINABLE DEV. L. & POL'Y 43, 43 (2010).
  10. Michael J. Viscuso, Note, Scrubbing the Books Green: A Temporal Evaluation of Corpo- rate Environmental Disclosure Requirements, 32 DEL. J. CORP. L. 879, 891 (2007).
  11. See Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases, 74 Fed. Reg. 56260 (Oct. 30, 2009).
  12. See Press Release, EPA, EPA Finalizes the Nation's First Greenhouse Gas Reporting System/Monitoring to begin in 2010 (Sept. 22, 2009), available at http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/ admpress.nsf/d985312f6895893b852574ac005f1e40/194e412153fcffea8525763900530d75!Open Document.
  13. Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, 74 Fed. Reg. 66496 (Dec. 15, 2009). The Clean Air Act is codified at U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. 55. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. No.
  14. -203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010) [hereinafter The Dodd-Frank Act]. For an overview and discus- sion of the law, see David M. Lynn, The Dodd-Frank Act's Specialized Corporate Disclosure: Using the Securities Laws to Address Public Policy Issues, 6 J. BUS. & TECH. L. 327 (2011). See Emily Veale, Is There Blood On Your Hands-Free Device?: Examining Legislative Approaches to the Conflict Minerals Problem in the Democratic Republic of Congo, 21 CARDOZO J. INT'L & COMP. L. 503, 544 (2013).
  15. Jeffrey M. McFarland, Warming Up to Climate Change Risk Disclosure, 14 FORDHAM J. CORP. & FIN. L. 281, 285-92 (2009).
  16. See CHRIS HIBBIT, LIMPERG INSTITUUT, EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURE AND REPORTING BY LARGE EUROPEAN COMPANIES 36 (2004) (citing British Petroleum's 1998 report to the SEC on potential impacts of the Kyoto Protocol).
  17. For a proposal to "globalize" the SEC disclosure rules, see Patricia Romano, Sustainable Development: A Strategy That Reflects the Effects of Globalization on the International Power Structure, 23 HOUS. J. INT'L L. 91, 108 (2000). For potential recourse to the Aarhus Convention see Nikzad Oraee-Mirzamani & Zen Makuch, Corporate Environmental Disclosure Law, Fiduci- ary Duties and the Aarhus Convention, 20 EUR. ENERGY & ENVTL. L. REV. 18-22 (2010).
  18. CARBON DISCLOSURE PROJECT, ARE UK COMPANIES PREPARED FOR THE INTERNATIONAL IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE? 6 (2013), available at http://www.pwc.co.uk/en\_UK/uk/assets/ pdf/cdp-ftse350-climate-change-2013.pdf (last visited Jan. 19, 2014).
  19. UNEP FIN. INITIATIVE, UNITED NATIONS PRINCIPLES FOR RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT AN- NUAL REPORT 2012, 4, available at http://www.unpri.org/viewer/?file=files/Annual%20report%20 2012.pdf (last visited Jan. 19, 2014). 74. Id. at 24.
  20. Jeroen Derwall et al., The Eco-Efficiency Premium Puzzle, 61 FIN. ANALYST J. 3, 3 (2005).
  21. SOC. INV. FORUM, 2010 REPORT ON SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE INVESTING TRENDS IN THE UNITED STATES 10 (2010); see also Socially Responsible Investing Facts, US SIF, https://web.arch ive.org/web/20111011143540/http://ussif.org/resources/sriguide/srifacts.cfm (last visited Feb. 12, 2014). US SIF, 2012 TRENDS REPORT (2012).
  22. Avery Fellow, Investors Demand Climate-Risk Disclosure in 2013 Proxies, BLOOMBERG, Feb. 25, 2013, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-25/investors-demand-climate-risk-dis closure-in-2013-proxies.html.
  23. KPMG, KPMG INTERNATIONAL SURVEY OF CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORTING
  24. Id. Sustainability reporting, for example, helps managers identify and eliminate waste and track the returns on investments in efficiency and improved products and services. See Adam J. Sulkowski, There's Gold in Them Thar Brownfields: The Legal Framework of Brownfield Rede- velopment and Some Tips for Getting Started, 39 REAL EST. L.J. 100, 111-12 (2010).
  25. For comparative overviews, see U.N. Econ. Comm'n for Europe, Supporting Frameworks for Corporate Environmental Reporting, U.N. Doc. ECE/CEP/AC.10/2009/7 (June 19, 2009), and TAREQ EMTAIRAH, INT'L INST. FOR INDUS. ENVTL. ECON., CORPORATE ENVIRON- MENTAL REPORTING: REVIEW OF POLICY ACTION IN EUROPE 2 (2002). See also Thomas P. Lyon & John W. Maxwell, Greenwash: Corporate Environmental Disclosure Under Threat of Audit, 20 J. ECON. & MGMT. STRATEGY 3-4 (2011). However, the French rules have been criticized as rela- tively lacking in environmental disclosure requirements, and no penalties have been established for non-compliance. Lucien J. Dhooge, Beyond Volunteerism: Social Disclosure and France's Nouvelles Régulations Économiques, 21 ARIZ. J. INT'L & COMP. L. 441, 445 (2004).
  26. Carlos Noronha, Si Tou, M.I. Cynthia & Jenny J. Guan, Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: An Overview and Comparison with Major Trends, 20 CORP. SOC. RESP. & ENVTL. MGMT. 30 (2012).
  27. Jem Bendell et al., Public Policies for Scaling Corporate Responsibility Standards: Ex- panding Collaborative Governance for Sustainable Development, 2 SUSTAINABILITY ACCT., MGMT. & POL'Y J. 263, 280 (2011).
  28. See Mark D. Abkowitz et al., Environmental Information Disclosure and Stakeholder Involvement: Searching for Common Ground, 6 CORP. ENVTL. STRATEGY 415, 415-16 (1999).
  29. Commission Recommendation 2001/453/EC, on the Recognition, Measurement, and Dis- closure of Environmental Issues in the Annual Accounts and Annual Reports of Companies, 2001 O.J. (L 156) 33 (EC).
  30. Council Directive 2003/51/EC, on the Annual and Consolidated Accounts of Certain Types of Companies, Banks and Other Financial Institutions and Insurance Undertakings, 2003 O.J. (L 178) 16-17 (EC).
  31. See AXEL HESSE, DAS KLIMAWANDELTSICH: INTEGRATION VON KLIMACHANCEN UND - RISIKEN IN DIE FINANZ-BERICHTERSTATTUNG 12 (2d ed. 2004).
  32. See PHILIPPE SANDS, PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW 864 (2d ed. 2003);
  33. Ted L. McDorman, Access to Information Under Article 9 of the OSPAR Convention (Ire- 94. See About UNEP FI, UNEPFI.ORG, http://www.unepfi.org/about/index.html (last visited Jan. 10, 2014); About the PRI Intiative, UNPRI.ORG, http://www.unpri.org/about-pri/about-pri/ (last visited Jan. 10, 2014).
  34. BANK FOR INT'L SETTLEMENTS, INTERNATIONAL CONVERGENCE OF CAPITAL MEASURE AND CAPITAL STANDARDS: A REVISED FRAMEWORK 112 (2006), available at http://www.bis.org/ publ/bcbs128.pdf. On further action by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ("Basel III Framework"), see Kevin Young, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, in HANDBOOK OF TRANSNATIONAL GOVERNANCE: INSTITUTIONS AND INNOVATIONS, supra note 89, at 39-45.
  35. Integrated Reporting, GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE, https://www.globalreporting.org/ information/current-priorities/integrated-reporting/Pages/default.aspx (last visited Jan. 13, 2014).
  36. Sulkowski & White, supra note 36, at 504-05.
  37. Id.
  38. PRICE WATERHOUSE, ACCOUNTING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE: CROSSROADS OF GAAP, ENGINEERING AND GOVERNMENT -SECOND SURVEY OF CORPORATE AMERICA'S AC- COUNTING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS 10-11 (1992).
  39. Case, supra note 8, at 410 (citing to Memorandum from Mary Kay Lynch, Director, EPA Office of Planning and Policy Analysis, and Eric V. Schaeffer, Director, EPA Office of Regula- tory Enforcement, to Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Directors, et al. (Jan. 19, 2001), available at www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/policies/incentives/programs/sec- guidedistributionofnotice.pdf).
  40. See Linda M. Lowson, SEC ESG Noncompliance: Where the Rubber Meets the Road, CSR Insight, 24 J. APPLIED CORP. FIN. 57, 57-64 (2012) ("According to the findings of the landmark CSR Insight™ Study, an estimated 75% of large public company U.S. and non-U.S. SEC filers are in violation of one or more SEC disclosure requirements on ESG issues, causing many SEC filings currently to be materially misleading, inaccurate, or even fraudulent. A second key finding of this study was that this corporate SEC noncompliance on ESG issues triggers serious liabilities and risks not only for the C-Suite, but also for the Board, the Independent Audi- tor, the Asset Manager, and a broad range of capital market transactions.") (quote from unpub- lished portion of the study on file with Governance & Accountability Institute, Inc.).
  41. Kevin L. Doran et al., RECLAIMING TRANSPARENCY IN A CHANGING CLIMATE: TRENDS IN CLIMATE RISK DISCLOSURE BY THE S&P 500 FROM 1995 TO THE PRESENT, CERES 1 (2009), availa- ble at http://www.ceres.org/resources/reports/reclaiming-transparency-in-a-changing-climate-1/ view. 105. Case, supra note 8, at 410-11.
  42. Id. Potentially more worrisome are the illegalities themselves and the admissions by a majority of corporate legal counsels that their corporate clients have been in violation of environ- mental laws. See, e.g., Marianne Lavelle, Environmental Vise: Law, Compliance, NAT'L L.J., Aug. 30, 1993, at S1.
  43. Telephone Interview (May 2006).
  44. Daniel C. Esty, Environmental Protection in the Information Age, 79 N.Y.U. L. REV. 115, 115 (2004).