The Rationality of Indonesia Free-Active Politics Facing Chinese Aggressiveness in the Claims of the North Natuna Sea (original) (raw)
Related papers
Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 2021
China's unilateral claim through the nine-dash line map covered part of the Indonesian Exclusive Economic Zone in the North Natuna Sea. This research endeavored to explain Indonesian Defense Diplomacy Strategy in resolving the claim peacefully, by avoiding open military confrontation adhering to the principles of international maritime law UNCLOS 1982. The cooperation between the two countries is much broader and takes into account Indonesia's national interests. Therefore, the researchers offered an approach to avoid conflict through a defense diplomacy strategy that chose to cool down the tensions between the two countries. It was called as cool defense diplomacy.
The Indonesia – China Relations in the Natuna Sea Dispute Resolution: Struggle for Sovereignty
Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 2022
This study aims to analyze the process of resolving the Natuna sea dispute between Indonesia and China to obtain their respective sovereignty. The Natuna Sea is one of the outermost waters in Indonesia, which is unilaterally claimed by China with a nine-dash line claim or the South China Sea. This claim overlaps with Indonesia's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in the Natuna Sea. As a result of this claim, many Chinese fishers are free to go in and out of catching fish in Natuna Waters with illegal fishing status. The method used in this research was qualitative and descriptive research. The data collection technique was based on a literature study and was strengthened by interviewees. The study results show that this dispute resolution process is carried out through two approaches, namely the international law approach and the diplomatic approach. Because through these two approach strategies, this dispute resolution can be achieved very comprehensively. The legal approach was tak...
AN ANALYSIS OF THE SOUTH CHINA SEA CONFLICT: INDONESIA'S PERSPECTIVES, CONTEXTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The South China Sea have been discussing seriously. Historically, the conflict had started from the contested area between France and Japan, until the outcome Second World War-power vacuum. None of the international documents provides clarity of sovereignty in the South China Sea. China, Vietnam, Taiwan, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Brunei Darussalam are those countries who have an overlapping territorial claim that are currently emerging are more due to economic, geostrategic, and domestic politics. As a non-claimant state, Indonesia has a role to facilitate and solving the conflict, because Indonesia's water, the North Natuna Sea, also has an area that is an incision on territorial claims. The alignment of ZEEI and the Nine-Dash Line has economic implications and regional defense setting. This article uses the qualitative analysis method to explore three purposes. First is to explore the historical, philosophy and legal-approach in discussing the background of the conflict. Second is to analyze the attitudes and perspectives of Indonesia's strategic position in the South China Sea. Third is to propose some possible recommendations that Indonesia needed to resolve SCS conflicts with the roles and actions required for international and regional purposes. Indonesia, as a non-claimant state, has a role of diplomacy as a mediator, honest broker, and confidence builder in the handling of the South China Sea conflict.
Journal of Islamic World and Politics, 2021
This article discusses the constructivism approach in describing Indonesia's changing orientation in the North Natuna Sea towards China's claims. In 2013-2014 Natuna was discussed by the central government in Jakarta in economic, cultural, and tourism aspects. In 2015, Natuna was officially reviewed by the Indonesian government from a security perspective. This security perspective is in the context of sovereignty and national security. This article aims to look at the change in Indonesia's direction in positioning the North Natuna Sea after being claimed by China as part of its territory. This article uses the constructivism theory of Alexander Went. Constructivism is a structural theory of the international system which has basic claims: the state is the most principled unit of analysis in international political theory, the key structure in the state system is inter-subjective from matter, and identities and interests are constructed of social structures, formed naturally by themselves. This article shows that Indonesia as an actor in constructivism is able to change its policy orientation through the perception of the challenges faced in the North Natuna Sea. This article uses a qualitative approach with the method of collecting data from a literature study.
Indonesian Foreign Policy Maintaining In Maritime Security Towards China's New Silk Road
Global Political Studies Journal, 2021
Indonesian Maritime Domain has overlapping area with one of the immense project which is China's New Silk Road. Thus, with providing opportunities such as financial loans and infrastructure investment which are essential to realize the appealing policy of Joko Widodo's, Global Maritime Fulcrum. However, this project doesn't seem without implications for Indonesian Maritime Security given current unsolved problems, South China Sea Dispute, IUU fishing and Natuna island. Indonesian Foreign Policy has always been on one of the main policy which is Free and Active. Also, internal and external factors such as anti-Chinese sentiment and US-China rivalry have been determinative for Joko Widodo's Policy as well. The researcher used the Qualitative research method with an explanatory approach in conducting the research and processing the data. The primary data document directly from ministries as an official statement and speech of leaders. Secondary data, written and visual sources such as scientific books or journals, archival sources, personal documents, internet sources, other official documents. This research concluded that Indonesian Foreign Policy is crucial in order to obtain benefits while reducing implications. Therefore, this research sought to establish how Indonesian Foreign Policy has been managing China's New Silk Road to maintain Maritime Security of Indonesia.
2019
Indonesia's foreign policy stance toward China is a significant issue as it is a major player and a core member of ASEAN. Southeast Asia is increasingly a competitive and important region of the world where China is asserting its great power status. Since 2009, China-related South China Sea controversies have intensified. After submitting its South China Sea claim to the United Nations in opposition to Malaysia and Vietnam's claim in 2009, China has increasingly defended its claim through increasing exercises and other forms of power assertion. The main purpose of this thesis is to show how and why Indonesia's China policy shifted after 2009 in reaction to China's action. The thesis explains each presidential administration's China policy between 1999 and 2019 by using Kuik's framework to identify the presence of two counteracting policies: risk-contingency and returns-maximizing options. Both of these policy options were executed by each Indonesian presidential administration toward China. After 2009, Indonesia's degree of power rejection toward China increased in comparison to power acceptance. It showed a growing tendency to balance against China by intensifying its risk-contingency policy. Thus, Indonesia's China policy shifted in the direction of balancing post-2009.
The Synergy of Indonesia’s Maritime Power Instrument to Face China’s Claim Over South China Sea
Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara, 2018
Despite the fact that Indonesia is not one of the claimant states, China's provocation through its fishing boats escorted by Chinese Coast Guard has been violating Indonesia Exclusive Economic Zone on South China Sea (SCS) which intersects with Nine Dashed Line (NDL). Up to this day, the synergy among Indonesian maritime power instruments to defend Indonesia's sovereign rights is still weak, thus the problem identified in this research is how the instrument of power authorized in Indonesia's maritime domain synergizes to face China's claim over SCS. Synergy analysis is seen from three aspects: perspective, policy, and Rules Of Engangement (ROE) applied to operational. This research uses qualitative method to further explore the research question, with Soft System Methodology technique to approach the problems through comparison between system of thought and real world in a structured manner, as well as supported by NVivo to execute the process of data triangulation. Research results show that Indonesia's maritime power instrument have not a harmonious perspective on NDL yet. This study also shows that policy created by policy makers and strategic derivatives created by strategy makers of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia have not been in harmony, thus appropriate ROE at operational level to face China's provocation on the SCS has not been formulated by adjusting authority with instrument capability. Overall, the study found that the synergy of Indonesia's maritime power instruments is not yet reliable to deal with China's Claims over the territory of Indonesia in the SCS.
The Diplomatic Effort on the Dispute between Indonesia and China in the North Natuna Sea
IJASS, 2022
Indonesia and China are having tensions over the conflict in the North Natuna Sea, yang berlokasi di Laut China Selatan. This tension is beginning from a Reuters report (published December 2, 2021) which stated that China sent a letter of protest asking Indonesia to stop oil and natural gas drilling activities in North Natuna Sea. This paper was compiled to find out the extent of the government's efforts through diplomacy to overcome the North Natuna conflict with China. The method used for this study was a literature study. The data obtained were compiled, analyzed, and concluded so as to obtain conclusions regarding the study of literature. The results show that, Indonesia and China have their respective interests in the South China Sea area, both in terms of national security and economy. Meanwhile, Indonesia has made soft diplomacy efforts to resolve the conflict with China. So far, Indonesia has implemented three subtle forms of diplomacy in the maritime field, namely Cooperative, Persuasive, and Coercive.
ASIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2019
After being a neutral actor for decades in the complex South China Sea (SCS) territorial disputes, Indonesia has seen itself compelled by China's assertiveness to become firmer about protecting its territorial sovereignty around the Natuna Islands (NI). Jakarta is alarmed by China's claims that it has undeniable historical fishing rights in the NI territorial waters because they undermine Indonesia's territorial sovereignty. Our analysis loosely adopts the securitization conceptual framework proposed by the Copenhagen School to reveal that Jakarta swiftly securitized the NI issue between 2014 and 2016. Using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, this paper unpacks how the Indonesian printed mainstream media discussed the NI in recent years. By the end of 2016, the Indonesian media portrayed China's claims that it has historical fishing rights in the NI territorial waters as the most urgent national security threat to Indonesia, i.e. the NI issue was securitized. This analysis shows that the Indonesian people accepted Jakarta's security discourse, i.e. Jakarta had successfully securitized China's claims over the NI territorial waters. This paper makes a new contribution to the securitization literature by simultaneously analysing the Indonesian news and social media outlets.
Soldiers and Diplomats: Indonesian Naval Diplomacy in the South China Sea
Indonesian Journal of International Relations
This paper seeks to understand why the Indonesian Navy is utilized as an instrument of diplomacy rather than as war fighters in the South China Sea. The disputes create a threat to Indonesia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Historically Indonesia has responded with the use of force in similar situations, however, this is not the case in the South China Sea Disputes. The qualitative method is used in this research in understanding and analyzing the data which is gathered from secondary sources. The theoretical framework used for this research is the national attribute and international system levels of analysis which posits that domestic and international conditions create constraints that affect foreign policy. The research finds that there are several conditions that constrain Indonesia’s response options in the South China Sea disputes and concludes that these constrains cause Indonesia to utilize her navy for diplomacy rather than battle.