Análise da influência das variáveis socioeconômicas no nível satisfação do Transporte Público Urbano (original) (raw)

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (21)

  1. BERTRAND, J. W. M.; FRANSOO, J. C. Operations management research methodologies using quantitative modeling. International Journal of Operations & Production Management V. 22, p.241-264, 2002.
  2. CHAPMAN, L. Transport and climate change: a review. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(5), 354-367, 2007. CHIOU, Y. C.; JOU, R. C.; YANG, C. H. Factors affecting public transportation usage rate: Geographically weighted regression. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 161-177, 2015.
  3. DA SILVA, R. A. N.; AZEVEDO FILHO, M. A. N. de, MACÊDO, M. H., SORRATINI, J. A., DA SILVA, A. F.; LIMA, J. P.; PINHEIRO, A. M. G. S. A comparative evaluation of mobility conditions in selected cities of the five Brazilian regions. Transport Policy, 37, 147-156, 2015.
  4. DE OÑA, J.; DE OÑA, R. Quality of service in public transport based on customer satisfaction surveys: A review and assessment of methodological approaches. Transportation Science, 49(3), 605-622, 2015.
  5. DE OÑA, R.; DE OÑA, J (2013b) Analyzing transit service quality evolution using decision trees and gender segmentation. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, v. 130, p. 611-621, 2013. de Operações Energéticas Sustentáveis " Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, Brasil, 20 a 23 de outubro de 2020.
  6. DIEZ-MESA, F.; DE OÑA, R.; DE OÑA, J. The Effect of Service Attributes' Hierarchy on Passengers' Segmentation. A Light Rail Transit Service Case Study. Transportation Research Procedia, v. 18, n. June, p. 234-241, 2016.
  7. DOS SANTOS, J. B.; LIMA, J. P.; OLIVEIRA, M. L. de. Estudo de indicadores de qualidade para transpo rte público urbano. Anais -XXXIX Encontro Nacional De Engenharia De Produção, ENEGEP, Santos, 2019.
  8. GUIRAO, B.; GARCÍA-PASTOR, A.; LÓPEZ-LAMBAS, M. E. The importance of service quality attributes in public transportation: Narrowing the gap between scientific research and practitioners' needs. Transport Policy, v. 49, p. 68-77, 2016.
  9. GRISÉ, E.; EL-GENEIDY, A. Evaluating the relationship between socially (dis) advantaged neighbourhoods and customer satisfaction of bus service in London. Journal of Transport Geography, v. 58, p. 166-175, 2017.
  10. HAN, Y.; LI, W., WEI, S.; ZHANG, T. Research on Passenger's travel mode choice behavior waiting at bus station based on SEM-logit integration Model. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6), 2018.
  11. MAHMOUD, M.; HINE, J. Using AHP to measure the perception gap between current and potential users of bus services. Transportation Planning and Technology, 36(1), 4-23, 2013.
  12. MARAGLINO, V.; DELL'OLIO, L.; BORRI, D.; PORTILLA, A. I. Methodology for a Study of the Perceived Quality of Public Transport in Santander. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 160, n. Cit, p. 499-508, 2014. NTU -Associação Nacional das Empresas de Transportes Urbanos. Anuário: 2017-2018. Brasília: NTU, 2018. NTU -Associação Nacional das Empresas de Transportes Urbanos. Anuário: 2018-2019. Brasília: NTU, 2019.
  13. RIBEIRO, K.; KOBAYASHI, S.; BEUTHE, M.; GASCA, J.; GREENE, D.; LEE, D. S.; MUROMACHI, Y., NEWTON, P. J., PLOTKIN, S., SPERLING, D., WIT, R., ZHOU, P. J. Transport and its infrastructure. Cambridge University Press, NY, USA, 2007.
  14. SARKAR, P. P.; MALLIKARJUNA, C. Effect of perception and attitudinal variables on mode choice behavior: A case study of Indian city, Agartala. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2017.
  15. TEMBE, A.; NAKAMURA, F.; TANAKA, S.; ARIYOSHI, R.; MIURA, S. The demand for public buses in sub-Saharan African cities: Case studies from Maputo and Nairobi. IATSS Research, 43(2), 122-130, 2018.
  16. TURRIONI, J. B.; MELLO, C. H. P. Metodologia de pesquisa em engenharia de produção: estratégias, métodos e técnicas para condução de pesquisas quantitativas e qualitativas. Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia de Produção, Universidade Federal de Itajubá, Itajubá, 2012. de Operações Energéticas Sustentáveis " Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, Brasil, 20 a 23 de outubro de 2020.
  17. VIJ, A.; CARREL, A.; WALKER, J. L. Incorporating the influence of latent modal preferences on travel mode choice behavior. Transportation Research Part A, 54, 164-178, 2013.
  18. WENG, J.; DI, X.; WANG, C.; WANG, J.; MAO, L. A bus service evaluation method from passenger's perspective based on satisfaction surveys: A case study of Beijing, China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(8), 1-15. 2018
  19. YÁÑEZ, M. F.; RAVEAU, S.; OETÚZAR, J. D. D. Inclusion of latent variables in Mixed Logit models : Modelling and forecasting. Transportation Research Part A, 44, 744-753, 2010.
  20. YANG, Y.; WANG, C.; LIU, W.; ZHOU, P. Understanding the determinants of travel mode choice of residents and its carbon mitigation potential. Energy Policy, 115, 486-493, 2018.
  21. ZAILANI, S.; IRANMANESH, M., ARIFFIN, T.; CHAN, T. Is the intention to use public transport for different travel purposes determined by different factors ? Transportation Research Part D, 49, 18-24, 2016.