Conceptual Developments in Environmental Law: An Interdisciplinary Approach (original) (raw)
Related papers
Weaving a Web of Environmental Law
2008
This book is the very first attempt to describe the development of environmental law. In particular, those developments under the auspices of the Environmental Law Programme of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, and within the network of the International Council of Environmental Law and all concerned national and international agencies and organizations.
Validity, Nature, and Future Generations: An Environmental Perspective of Legal Theory
Environmental law has been living a period of consolidation. However, the proliferation of legal sources became a burden for lawyers and judges. The problem of too much environmental law has generated duplication and conflicts between norms and regimes, scattered in several layers. It is rather debatable whether this increasing quantity of environmental law has really improved the state of the environment and fostered sustainable development and intergenerational justice. This essay aims to drag legal theorists and their perspectives to the field of environmental law, in order to improve regimes which are still undergoing the transition from youth to middle age.
Towards a Critical Environmental Law
This chapter aims to develop further the underlying aim of the anthology 'Law and Ecology', namely the production of what can be called Critical Environmental Law. Situated in this wider ecology of unhomeliness (no all encompassing oikos) and miscommunication (no unifying logos), environmental law finally faces its foundational paradox: that its conceptual limits are both potentially all-inclusive (since every societal problem can be seen as more or less environmental) and devoid of any content (since environmental law can no longer distinguish its ‘object’, namely environment per se). The traditional imaging of the environment as the thing that turns (French virer) around a stable pivot (a distilled sense of pure humanity) has been discredited in view of the collapse of the boundaries between the natural/human/artificial. In order to address this permeability, environmental law has the opportunity and responsibility to construct an adequate theoretical base for its role in environmental protection. The chapter argues for four critical environmental positions that are necessary for environmental law’s attempt at catching up both with other disciplines and the demands made to it by an ever-changing ecology. Thus, first, environmental law must theorise itself as acentric, namely conceive of itself as only one amongst a multiplicity of perspectives, none of which could ever claim to be central (yet all of them claiming precisely that); second, environmental law must de-individualise the individual and position the human in an ecological plane beyond anthropo/ecocentricity; third, environmental law must relinquish the (traditional ecological) ideal of unity and accept uncertainty as a structural and constantly present inevitability rather than an invisibilised externality; and fourth, environmental law must move beyond the illusionary construction of prescriptive idealities and focus on a measured legal description of its own limitations. Largely following a critical reading of Niklas Luhmann’s theory of autopoiesis, and influenced by postecological, feminist, spatial and other radical theoretical writings, the chapter attempts to carve a space of critique simultaneously within and outside environmental law, a mirror of ethical responsibility against which the law can measure its potential, its limits and ultimately its objects of desire. In effect, critical environmental law is an acentric, postecological, manifold and self-aware “thrown-together” of events and spaces which become ‘solid’ and relatively permanent through repetition.
Environmental Law for the 21st Century
Pace Environmental Law Review, 2023
One of the commenters on a preliminary draft of this article suggested that we have a love-hate relationship with law and economics. Perhaps a better metaphor would be that we are prodigal sons. We both studied under the great Guido Calabresi, one of the founders of Law and Economics. We revere him as a mentor, and we believe that we are applying and extending his work to our field. We both also learned a great deal from professors Bruce A. Ackerman and Susan Rose Ackerman, also our colleagues at Yale, who were among the first to apply law and economics thinking to Environmental Law. 1 Elliott was privileged to co
Transnational Environmental Law, 2017
Scott explores how transnational law developments challenge understandings of what is ' legal ' and give rise to various conceptions of ' law ' , the most conservative of which resembles law ' as we currently know and practice it ' but adapted to actions or events that transcend national boundaries. 8 See ch 1, n 103. 9 See ch 5(II)(C). 10 eg ch 4(V)(B)(ii). Administrative lawyers are also confronted with the increasing use of policy and soft law in governance and (thus) judicial review actions: Robyn Creyke and John McMillan , ' Soft Law v Hard Law ' in Linda Pearson , Carol Harlow and Michael Taggart (eds), Administrative Law in a Changing State (Hart 2008). 11 See ch 3(II).
Law and Ecology: New Environmental Foundations
2012
Law and Ecology: New Environmental Foundations contains a series of theoretical and applied perspectives on the connection between law and ecology, which together offer a radical and socially responsive foundation for environmental law. While its legal corpus grows daily, environmental law has not enjoyed the kind of jurisprudential underpinning generally found in other branches of law. This book forges a new ecological jurisprudential foundation for environmental law - where ‘ecological' is understood both in the narrow sense of a more ecosystemic perspective on law, and in the broad sense of critical self-reflection of the mechanisms of environmental law as they operate in a context where boundaries between the human and the non-human are collapsing, and where the traditional distinction between ecocentrism and anthropocentrism is recast. Addressing current debates, including the intellectual property of bioresources; the protection of biodiversity in view of tribal land demands; the ethics of genetically modified organisms; the redefinition of the 'human' through feminist and technological research; the spatial/geographical boundaries of environmental jurisdiction; and the postcolonial geographies of pollution - Law and Ecology redefines the way environmental law is perceived, theorised and applied. It also constitutes a radical challenge to the traditionally human-centred frameworks and concerns of legal theory.