Analysis of Ethics Teaching in Law Schools: Replacing Lost Benefits of the Apprentice System in the Academic Atmosphere, An (original) (raw)
AI-generated Abstract
The paper analyzes the current state of ethics teaching in law schools, highlighting its historical shortcomings and the shift from the apprentice system to academic environments. It identifies the need for comprehensive education in ethical principles relevant to legal practice, categorizes teaching goals and methodologies, and suggests ways to enhance the effectiveness of ethics instruction in law schools.
Related papers
Teaching Ethics In and Outside of Law Schools: What Works and What Doesn’t
2006
I started teaching law school courses in Professional Responsibility in 1984. I taught my first ethics CLE program in 1985. Right from the beginning, I noticed that navigating the classroom in Professional Responsibility was a much trickier business than teaching the other courses I taught. In 1988 I went to a conference at which David Luban gave a talk called “12 ways to fail as a PR teacher.” I was astonished to learn that it wasn’t just me, and that even David Luban (who, like Deborah Rhode, is one of my permanent role models) was finding it difficult to teach legal ethics. Luban inventoried some of what I have since learned are “the usual problems” that legal ethics teachers encounter. For example, how do you overcome the disengagement or hostility of cynical students who think the class is a bunch of hooey? How can a teacher avoid being regarded as a touchy-feely Pollyanna? How is one supposed to teach an increasingly voluminous and complex body of law without becoming a doctri...
Teaching Ethics Seriously: Legal Ethics as the Most Important Subject in Law School
Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal, 1998
Despite the strong commitment of leaders of the bar and legal education to improve the ethics of law students and lawyers, legal ethics remains at best a second-class subject in law school. The Article explains “that that the persistent disregard for teaching legal ethics is grounded in three outdated ideological perspectives:” an unproven faith in the moral superiority of lawyers and of legal education, an outmoded pedagogical approach grounded in a late nineteenth century understanding of legal education that rejects teaching values, and a preconceived notion that as adults law students lack the capacity for moral development. Contrary to these biases, current scholarship demonstrates the potential for teaching law students ethics. This can only be done effectively through a first year course that teaches both doctrine and the role of the lawyer in society, and that sends students a message that ethical responsibility is central to thinking and acting like a lawyer. Taking the rhe...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.