Multiple criteria evaluation of the mass transit systems in european cities (original) (raw)
Related papers
The use of multiple-criteria ranking methods for designing public transport systems
Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich, 2014
The aim of the paper was an attempt at application of multiple-criteria analysis for planning public transport system. Methodological rules of an assessment of public transport systems were presented, including: defining variants and coherent family of criteria. Modelling decision-maker's preferences and seeking the most desirable solution. The problem of an assessment of public transport systems was formulated as a multiple-criteria problem of variants ranking. Schemes of appropriate communication connections (routes) were developed in the work using GIS technology and subjected to the assessment by means of a coherent family of criteria using the decision maker's preferences.
Urban Transport XXIII, 2017
The construction choice between two different transport systems in urban areas, as in the case of Light-Rail Transit (LRT) and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) solutions, is often performed on the basis of cost-benefit analysis and geometrical constraints due to the available space for the infrastructure. Classical economic analysis techniques are often unable to take into account some of the non-monetary parameters which have a huge impact on the final result of the choice, since they often include social acceptance and sustainability aspects. The application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques can aid decision makers in the selection process, with the possibility to compare non-homogeneous criteria, both qualitative and quantitative, and allowing the generation of an objective ranking of the different alternatives. The coupling of MCDA and Geographic Information System (GIS) environments also permits an easier and faster analysis of spatial parameters, and a clearer representation of indicator comparisons. Based on these assumptions, a LRT and BRT system will be analysed according to their own transportation, economic, social and environmental impacts as a hypothetical exercise; moreover, through the use of MCDA techniques a global score for both systems will be determined, in order to allow for a fully comprehensive comparison.
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis of Sustainable Urban Public Transport Systems
2021
Urban public transport systems must be economically efficient and additionally environmentally sustainable. Available decision support systems, including multiple criteria decision models, allow identifying which urban public transport vehicles are acceptable and those that should no longer be used in efficient and environmentally friendly cities. Previous research has ranked urban public transport vehicles by applying analytic hierarchy process multi-criteria decision-making models, from economic and non-polluting perspectives. However, until now, the types of vehicles acceptable for fleet renewal have not been identified. This study proposes a consistent combination of the ELECTRE TRI multiple criteria decision sorting method and the DELPHI procedure, the objective of which is to identify which urban public transport vehicles are acceptable, taking into consideration a suggested sustainable threshold, which includes economic and environmental strict requirements. The proposed mode...
Czasopismo Techniczne, 2018
This article presents the main components of the multi-criteria decision making (mCDm) methodology and their application in the assessment of several public transportation solutions in a specific traffic corridor. The corridor in question is 15 km long and runs through the centre of Wrocław, Poland. The analysis focused on six alternative scenarios. The following elements were taken into consideration in their design: alternative means of land transport; different types of vehicles and priorities for public transportation; location of bus and tram stops. The individual solutions were assessed based on six criteria designed to measure different aspects of the problem with the use of two alternative mCDm methods: electre III/Iv and ahP. Computational experiments established the final ranking of transport solutions in the corridor from best to worst in terms of the analysed criteria.
Sustainability
The quality of the public transport sector affects the economy and the daily livelihoods of passengers. One of the most important objectives of policymakers is to choose the influencing criteria for performance evaluations. A variety of factors are crucial for raising the standards of public transportation services. In this investigation, we used a decision-based model with uncertainty in order to identify significant criteria in the public transport sector. We also performed a comparative analysis to rank the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC) bus depots based on their performance using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques such as TOPSIS, VIKOR, and ELECTRE. To handle judgement ambiguities, in this work we incorporated the Delphi method (DM) and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), along with fuzzy set theory. The fuzzy Delphi method was used to filter the important criteria. Using a fuzzy AHP approach, the screening criterion weights and ranking...
A multiple criteria approach for the evaluation of the rail transit networks in Istanbul
Transportation, 2004
The deficiencies in the Istanbul transportation system have led the local authorities to plan several alternative transportation projects. In this paper three alternative rail transit network proposals are evaluated by using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a multiple criteria decision support system. The AHP facilitates decision-making by organizing perceptions, experiences, knowledge and judgments, the forces that influence the decision, into a hierarchical framework with a goal, scenarios, criteria and alternatives of choice. Based on this analysis, the decision makers have developed a new alternative as a combination of the most closely competing two alternative rail transit networks. This combination rail transit network is currently under construction.
Multi-criteria approaches for urban passenger transport systems: a literature review
Annals of Operations Research, 2014
Megacities around the world are highly concerned about the impacts of urban transportation. The rapid urbanization and motorization in megacities have a direct impact on sustainable development. Hence, it is very frequently to find the multiple actors from both private and public sectors involved in the design and operation of urban passenger transportation systems to make decisions that seek at optimizing their own particular objectives. However, urban passenger transport system is a very complex task involving multiple criteria related to economic, environmental and socio-political issues. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques actually aid the decision making process by assessing such problems. This paper presents a review of research papers published between 1982 and 2014 (up to May) concerning MCDM for the design and operation of urban passenger transport systems. From the analysis over more than 30 years, the current paper highlights the importance of taking into account the multiplicity of actors and their own decision criteria, as well as the resolution technique. Finally, some suggestions for future research are discussed. Keywords Passenger transport • Multi-criteria • Decision-making • Review 1 Introduction Transport infrastructure is a prerequisite, and somehow a guarantee, of economic development (Adler 1987). Transport is an essential service in cities that highly contributes to the
Multi-criteria analysis model to evaluate transport systems: An application in Florianópolis, Brazil
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017
Urban mobility via public transport is currently one of the major challenges facing policymakers and residents. The increasing demand for transport, the growing number of vehicles on the road, and the improvement of road infrastructure in large cities are some of the trends that need to be addressed by government agencies and society as a whole. Public transport services should play an important role, providing high quality services for users, being more attractive to potential users, and providing an efficient use of urban space. However it is necessary to understand how users evaluate the available services by evaluating the objective and subjective aspects involved in the perception of service quality. The present study aims to develop a multi-criteria model to assess urban public transport, with an approach centered on user perceptions. Through the use of multi-criteria evaluation, it is possible to identify the objective and subjective factors that determine a user's opinion of the service, enabling improvements. The study is applied in a specific transport system, the Integrated Public Transport System (SIT), implemented in Florianópolis and other Brazilian cities.
2018
User satisfaction is an intrinsic aspect of any service and since public transport is a service based supply, it has to be continuously assessed for user satisfaction. This paper aims at depicting the results of the hybrid approach based on user satisfaction and multi criteria decision making, applied for the ranking of the public bus alternatives in Kathmandu. The implemented approach expounded vividly in the methodology is abode of three stages, explicitly, collection of data pertaining to user satisfaction under each established criteria, determination of relative weights of criteria used to evaluate the alternatives on the basis of judgements from the experts and finally the integration of user satisfaction with expert opinion to rank the alternatives. Fuzzy environment endows a comfortable opportunity to the users and the experts to provide pertinent ratings in qualitative terms like high, very high or low rather than ratings in discrete numbers
European Transport Research Review
Introduction: The use of participatory techniques in the field of transport is coming to the forefront recently. In this frame, eight co-creation workshops and five online crowdsourcing campaigns took place in Thessaloniki, Southern Tuscany, Rotterdam/The Hague, and Frankfurt, from which many innovative ideas to enhance Public Transport were generated by citizens. Purpose: A simple list of innovations would not be very useful for Public Transport Operators, as they cannot implement all of them at once. There was an obvious need for their ranking and this is the purpose of this paper. Methods: The ranking was realized with the most used Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis method in transportation research, i.e. the Analytic Hierarchy Process, using three criteria: Feasibility, Utility, and Innovativeness. An online questionnaire was distributed to experts, using a modified snowball sampling technique, which yielded 97 completed questionnaires. Results: Utility (42.90%) was found to be the most important criterion, followed by Feasibility (40.10%), and Innovativeness (17.00%). Four lists of innovations were derived, ranked with respect to a) all three examined criteria, b) Feasibility, c) Utility, and d) Innovativeness. The highest ranked innovation for a) and c) was found to be Mobility as a Service and platform with real-time travel, comfort, and multi-modal information; for b) City marketing from a Public Transport perspective; and for d) Advanced e-ticketing system. Conclusion: The results revealed which of the innovations are the most promising and provide valuable insight into how to integrate innovation with Public Transport to make it more attractive. Public Transport Operators may use the results according to the peculiarities of their city and the importance they give to Feasibility, Utility, and Innovativeness.