Sustainability Assessment Report: Year 4 (original) (raw)
Related papers
H&AC 2012 Sustainability Report
We define sustainability as the presence of structures and processes that allow a program to leverage resources to most effectively implement evidence-based policies and activities over time.
The program management process with sustainability considerations
Journal of Project, Program & Portfolio Management, 2010
Program management has been widely accepted as an effective tool for making strategic and tactical changes. A brief review of the program management process showed that the ambiguity-reduction learning loop together with the uncertainty-reduction performance loop would make program management a feasible sustainability-oriented management tool for addressing the needs of a sustainable society. The requirements and impacts of sustainability are becoming important considerations in formulating a program; however, not much related literature can be found within the project management body of knowledge. This paper aims to facilitate the understanding of “Sustainability in Program Management”. Sustainability considerations adopting a three pillars approach is proposed. A “Program Sustainability Assessment Framework” is constructed to help the program manager incorporate sustainability considerations into program management practices. The key factors for aligning program sustainability to ...
Using the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool to Assess and Plan for Sustainability
Preventing Chronic Disease, 2014
Implementing and growing a public health program that benefits society takes considerable time and effort. To ensure that positive outcomes are maintained over time, program managers and stakeholders should plan and implement activities to build sustainability capacity within their programs. We describe a 3-part sustainability planning process that programs can follow to build their sustainability capacity. First, program staff and stakeholders take the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool to measure their program's sustainability across 8 domains. Next, managers and stakeholders use results from the assessment to inform and prioritize sustainability action planning. Lastly, staff members implement the plan and keep track of progress toward their sustainability goals. Through this process, staff can more holistically address the internal and external challenges and pressures associated with sustaining a program. We include a case example of a chronic disease program that completed the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool and engaged in program sustainability planning.
Program sustainability begins with the first events
Evaluation and Program Planning, 2005
This study examines the process by which a program becomes sustainable. In health promotion, sustainability is usually modeled as the final stage of a program's evolution. In practice, however, this stage model appears deceiving. This article proposes that processes for implementing programs and for ensuring their sustainability are concomitant. Using a multiple-case study methodology, we examined routinization-the sustainability process in organizations-of the Quebec Heart Health Demonstration Project in five community health centers over 10 years. Data came from documents and interviews. The analysis considered themes using the Critical Incident Technique. Our results suggest routinization-related events occurred as soon as the project began, and the occurrence of specific routinization events foresaw the presence of program-related routines. These events were concomitant with those associated with implementation. This supports the proposition. It suggests health promoters should consider program sustainability from the very beginning, and can take inspiration from the events presented herein when looking for ways to influence the sustainability of their programs. q
A dissertation to understand the global rhetoric on the subject of sustainability to identify a true meaning amongst the fog.
Making public health programs last: conceptualizing sustainability
Evaluation and Program Planning, 2004
In public health, programs constitute an important method of improving health, and program sustainability is critical. Knowledge on sustainability raises nevertheless two major issues. The first concerns the social structures within which programs are sustained. The literature suggests different structures however only organizational structures, namely routines, are used for analysis. The second issue concerns the temporal aspect of sustainability that is typically conceived as the final phase of program development after the planning, implementation, and evaluation phases. This 'stage' model does not allow one to consider that sustainability must be prepared in advance, concomitantly with implementation. These structural and temporal dimensions ground our proposal to re-conceive sustainability. The literature on organizations defines two relevant social structures, one organizational (routines), and one institutional (standards). This in turn suggests three degrees of sustainability. We then emphasize how sustainability is concomitant with the implementation process, by exploring events that characterize these processes. q
The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool: A New Instrument for Public Health Programs
Preventing Chronic Disease, 2014
Public health programs can deliver benefits only if they are able to sustain programs, policies, and activities over time. Although numerous sustainability frameworks and models have been developed, there are almost no assessment tools that have demonstrated reliability or validity or have been widely disseminated. We present the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT), a new and reliable instrument for assessing the capacity for program sustainability of various public health and other programs.
World Development, 2004
Sustainability'' is an inherently dynamic, indefinite and contested concept. ''Sustainable development'' must, therefore, be seen as an unending process-defined not by fixed goals or the specific means of achieving them, but by an approach to creating change through continuous learning and adaptation. How, then, do we evaluate a development programÕs contribution to such a process? This paper constructs a framework for evaluating sustainable rural development programs using both process-and outcome-oriented criteria, and demonstrates its application. The SANREM CRSP/SEA research and development program in The Philippines-including ICRAFs efforts to organize communities around agroforestry and environmental conservation-is assessed.
Sustainable Program Management: Hierarchical Causal Systems
This research paper focuses on strengthening program management protocols, which can help in mitigating nuances along with duplication, and redundancies. In this context, seven components have been considered for facilitating the achievement of sustainable management of a development program. Thus, for conducting this study, a conceptual framework of the "CARROT-BUS" model has been taken into due consideration. CARROT mainly stands for Capacity, Accountability, Resources, Results, Ownership, and Transparency, which emphasizes enabling the environment while BUS is perceived as a bottom-up strategy. Correspondingly, this holistic and causal model can be considered to be conceptually synonymous with Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory. Additionally, each step of the model needs to be well-defined and described. Hence, designing and implementing sustainable development programs can be considered to be complex. Therefore, the systems presented in this abstract are a way of addressing these complexities.