Comparison of Anterior Chamber Parameters between Normal and Keratoconus Eyes using Scheimpflug Photography (original) (raw)
Anterior Segment Characteristics of Keratoconus Eyes Using ScheimpflugPlacido Topography
Peertechz Journals
View PDFchevron_right
Rotating Scheimpflug Imaging Indices in Different Grades of Keratoconus
Maged Roshdy
Journal of Ophthalmology, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
Comparative Analysis of Anterior Segment Parameters in Normal and Keratoconus Eyes Generated by Scheimpflug Tomography
Ebru Toker
Journal of Ophthalmology, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Repeatability and agreement of three Scheimpflug-based imaging systems for measuring anterior segment parameters in keratoconus
Chaitra Jayadev
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
The role of reference body selection in calculating posterior corneal elevation and prediction of keratoconus using rotating Scheimpflug camera
Illés Kovács, Monika Ecsedy
Acta Ophthalmologica, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Evaluation of Scheimpflug Tomography Parameters in Subclinical Keratoconus, Clinical Keratoconus and Normal Caucasian Eyes
Samira Huseynli
Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of Two Different Scheimpflug Devices in the Detection of Keratoconus, Regular Astigmatism, and Healthy Corneas
Gerd Geerling
Journal of Ophthalmology, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Evaluation of Scheimpflug imaging parameters in subclinical keratoconus, keratoconus, and normal eyes
Muhip Ozkan
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Corneal Aberrations in Keratoconus: A Pentacam Scheimpflug Imaging Study
Hamidu Gobeka
Journal of Contemporary Medicine, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
Comparative analysis of corneal thickness parameters using Scheimpflug imaging system and HD-OCT in keratoconic eyes
Marta Robak
2021
View PDFchevron_right
Correlation of corneal elevations measured by Scheimpflug corneal imaging with severity of keratoconus
Reza Moghadam
journal of current ophthalmology, 2019
View PDFchevron_right
Comparative evaluation of dual Scheimpflug imaging parameters in keratoconus, early keratoconus, and normal eyes
Jacqueline Cater
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
Revisiting keratoconus diagnosis and progression classification based on evaluation of corneal asymmetry indices, derived from Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconic and suspect cases
George Asimellis
Clinical Ophthalmology, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of corneal measurements using two different Scheimpflug analyzers in Sirius and Pentacam devices
Parisa Abdi
Scientific Reports
View PDFchevron_right
Intrasubject repeatability in keratoconus-eye measurements obtained with a new Scheimpflug photography–based system
Jorge Alio
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Assessment of Anterior Segment Parameters of Keratoconus Eyes in an Australian Population
Mark Daniel
Optometry and Vision Science, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
Sensitivity and Specificity of Posterior Corneal Elevation Measured by Pentacam in Discriminating Keratoconus/Subclinical Keratoconus
Davide Turco
Ophthalmology, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Corneal thickness measurements with Scheimpflug and slit scanning imaging techniques in keratoconus
Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal of Current Ophthalmology, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
Evaluation of Corneal Elevation in Eyes with Subclinical Keratoconus and Keratoconus using Galilei Double Scheimpflug Analyzer
Mohammad Jafarinasab
European Journal of Ophthalmology, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Scheimpflug Camera Measurement of Anterior and Posterior Corneal Curvature in Eyes With Previous Radial Keratotomy
Michele Carbonelli
Journal of Refractive Surgery, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Corneal elevation indices in normal and keratoconic eyes
Han Bor Fam
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2006
View PDFchevron_right
Corneal Asymmetry Analysis by Pentacam Scheimpflug Tomography for Keratoconus Diagnosis
fernando fuentes
Journal of Refractive Surgery, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Correlation of Anterior and Posterior Corneal Shape in Clinical Keratoconus
Aida Jimenez-Corona
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
Repeatability and agreement of 2 Scheimpflug analyzers in measuring the central corneal thickness and anterior chamber angle, volume, and depth
Andrea Bedei
European Journal of Ophthalmology, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Agreement Between Three Different Scheimpflug Systems in Measuring Corneal and Anterior Segment Biometry
Alejandro Navas
Journal of Refractive Surgery, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
Evaluation of Intereye Corneal Asymmetry in Patients with Keratoconus. A Scheimpflug Imaging Study
Illés Kovács
PLoS ONE, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
A Novel scoring system for distinguishing keratoconus from normal eyes
Faik Orucoglu
Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
Anterior segment characteristics of keratoconus eyes in a sample of Asian population
Seyed Mahdi Ahmadi Hosseini
Contact Lens and …, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Clinical evaluation of keratometry and computerised videokeratography: intraobserver and interobserver variability on normal and astigmatic corneas
Costas Karabatsas
British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1998
View PDFchevron_right
Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of curvature and aberrometric measurements of the posterior corneal surface in normal eyes using Scheimpflug photography
David P Piñero
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
Corneal elevation and thickness in relation to the refractive status measured with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system
Muhip Ozkan
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Use of the Visante™ OCT to measure the sagittal depth and scleral shape of keratoconus compared to normal corneae: Pilot study
J M
Journal of Optometry, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Measurements of anterior segment parameters using three different non-contact optical devices in keratoconus patients
Yusuf Yıldırım
International journal of ophthalmology, 2013
View PDFchevron_right