Memorandum on the Use of in Silico Methods for Assessment of Chemical Hazard (original) (raw)
Related papers
Chemical Risk Assessment Using the CHAP, NIOSH, USEPA, and ILO e-Tools and Other Exposure Information, 2022
Chemical safety in the workplace is important. However, understanding the danger of hazardous different can be difficult, especially if exposure guidelines are lacking. Small and medium-sized workplaces often get much of their information on chemicals from the Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) supplied with each product. Chemical manufacturers, suppliers or distributers are required to provide information on chemical hazard and the correct use and application of the chemical or product. While only the most recent version of the SDS should be used for an exposure risk assessment, evaluating the occupational exposure can be difficult. Additional chemical information can be found in the
Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety SCCS OPINION ON preservative EcoG
2016
SCCS OPINION ON preservative EcoG+ SCCS The Committee, on request of Commission services, provides Opinions on questions concerning health and safety risks (notably chemical, biological, mechanical and other physical risks) of non-food consumer products (e.g. cosmetic products and their ingredients, toys, textiles, clothing, personal care and household products such as detergents, etc.) and services (e.g.: tattooing, artificial sun tanning, etc.).
2018
The main task of the Nordic Expert Group for Criteria Documentation of Health Risks from Chemicals (NEG) is to produce criteria documents to be used by the regulatory authorities as the scientific basis for setting occupational exposure limits for chemical substances. For each document, NEG appoints one or several authors. An evaluation is made of all relevant published, peer-reviewed original literature found. The document aims at establishing dose-response/dose-effect relationships and defining a critical effect. No numerical values for occupational exposure limits are proposed. Whereas NEG adopts the document by consensus procedures, thereby granting the quality and conclusions, the authors are responsible for the factual content of the document.
Computational Toxicology, 2019
In silico chemical safety assessment can support the evaluation of hazard and risk following potential exposure to a substance. A symposium identified a number of opportunities and challenges to implement in silico methods, such as quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) and read-across, to assess the potential harm of a substance in a variety of exposure scenarios, e.g. pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and industrial chemicals. To initiate the process of in silico safety assessment, clear and unambiguous problem formulation is required to provide the context for these methods. These approaches must be built on data of defined quality, while acknowledging the possibility of novel data resources tapping into on-going progress with data sharing. Models need to be developed that cover appropriate toxicity and kinetic endpoints, and that are documented appropriately with defined uncertainties. The application and implementation of in silico models in chemical safety requires a flexible technological framework that enables the integration of multiple strands of data and evidence. The findings of the symposium allowed for the identification of priorities to progress in silico chemical safety assessment towards the animal-free assessment of chemicals.
The Nordic Expert Group for Criteria Documentation of Health Risks from Chemicals
2013
The main task of the Nordic Expert Group for Criteria Documentation of Health Risks from Chemicals (NEG) is to produce criteria documents to be used by the regulatory authorities as the scientific basis for setting occupational exposure limits for chemical substances. For each document, NEG appoints one or several authors. An evaluation is made of all relevant published, peer-reviewed original literature found. The document aims at establishing dose-response/dose-effect relationships and defining a critical effect. No numerical values for occupational exposure limits are proposed. Whereas NEG adopts the document by consensus procedures, thereby granting the quality and conclusions, the authors are responsible for the factual content of the document.
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computation for Science and Technology, 2015
In frame of risk analysis, hazard identification and characterization are parts of risk assessment that should be performed to assure the safety aspect of a substance that will be used as food additive. According to WHO guidance, the two steps can be performed experimentally, based on epidemiological data or based on chemical structure calculation. In line with this guidance, the aim of this research was to obtain data describe the hazardous properties of several compounds used as food additive applying predictive in silico methods. Hazardous properties were limited to mutagenicity and carcinogenicity effects. The software applied including Toxtree, T.E.S.T., VEGA Benigni/Bossa, VEGA CAESAR and VEGA SARpy. A positive result can be accepted if all the prediction models give the same results and alerts on the compound for carcinogenic and mutagenic potential. If only one or more, but not all those prediction models, showing alert on a compound or give positive result, than it is assumed that the results are still not enough to predict carcinogenic or mutagenic effects of that compound unless experimental data supporting those effects are available. Fifty four compounds of flavour functional class were included in our study. Following our criteria, 20 compounds of them show negative results on mutagenicity prediction; however the rests 34 compounds give different prediction results and hence need experimental data for confirmation. In the case of carcinogenicity predictions, 14 compounds of them were predicted to show no carcinogenic potential, 10 compounds of them were predicted to show carcinogenic potential, while the rests 30 compounds show different prediction results and hence need experimental data for confirmation. Based on overall results, it was concluded that this in silico approaches can be used to perform preliminary evaluation of hazardous properties, especially those of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity effects.