Report on citizenship law : India (original) (raw)
Related papers
Report on citizenship law : Pakistan
2016
Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS), created in 1992 and directed by Professor Brigid Laffan, aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research on the major issues facing the process of European integration, European societies and Europe's place in 21 st century global politics. The Centre is home to a large post-doctoral programme and hosts major research programmes, projects and data sets, in addition to a range of working groups and ad hoc initiatives. The research agenda is organised around a set of core themes and is continuously evolving, reflecting the changing agenda of European integration, the expanding membership of the European Union, developments in Europe's neighbourhood and the wider world.
International Journal of Law, 2023
This paper examines the idea of citizenship introduction in India and the importance of citizenship in determining who gets to elect the country's leaders. Almost every country adheres to the notion of citizenship, which has given rise to many debates and, at the same time, established a clearly defined nation. You may get a thorough explanation of the guidelines that must be followed and the requirements for becoming an Indian citizen in this essay. In December of 2019, the Indian Parliament passed the Citizenship (Amendment) Act. (CAA). A new rule will make it much simpler for non-Muslim refugees leaving conflict in Bangladesh, Afghanistan or Pakistan to become citizens of India. Widespread demonstrations broke out in India shortly after the CAA was approved, leading to the government's use of force to suppress the protesters. In view of this legislation and the associated idea for a state wide National Registry of Citizens, the widespread deprivation of voting rights of Indian Muslims is of great concern. This essay summarizes the CAA and talks about how India's great stride toward religious freedom has historically influenced the country and will continue to do so in the future.
Report on citizenship law : Bangladesh
2016
Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS), created in 1992 and directed by Professor Brigid Laffan, aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research on the major issues facing the process of European integration, European societies and Europe's place in 21 st century global politics. The Centre is home to a large post-doctoral programme and hosts major research programmes, projects and data sets, in addition to a range of working groups and ad hoc initiatives. The research agenda is organised around a set of core themes and is continuously evolving, reflecting the changing agenda of European integration, the expanding membership of the European Union, developments in Europe's neighbourhood and the wider world.
Exclusionary Trends in the Indian Citizenship Regime
The Routledge Handbook of Refugees in India, 2022
Citizenship is one of the most debated constitutional topics in India since independence. This chapter documents the evolution of Citizenship Acts, principally, with respect to refugees. The role of ad hoc constitutional provisions which grant the parliament the right to change citizenship norms is also scrutinized. It investigates how the idea of citizenship has undertaken a drastic ideological shift from jus soli, the inclusionary idea, to jus sanguinis, the exclusionary one on religious lines. The chapter reviews the constituent assembly discourses on citizenship before and after the partition of India and analyzes the impact of the latter in bringing exclusionary dimensions to the notion of citizenship. Citizenship Act 1955 and the manifold amendments it was subject to and the aggravation of exclusionary aspect apropos refugees with reference to the chaotic Assam movement is cohesively analyzed. The inclusionary characteristics of Indian citizenship and the features and drawbacks of the recent Citizenship Amendment Act 2019 are also discussed at length. I emphasize how the exclusionary idea of citizenship is manifested with religion as a criterion and stress the need to adopt an inclusive citizenship regime based on the idea of secularism, equality, and fraternity.
India’s citizenship and nationality at the crossroads | Forward Press
Forward Press, 2020
How did the exclusionary citizenship law of today come to be? Goldy M. George traces the birth of the Citizenship Act and the several amendments it underwent over the years and explains the implications of the hotly debated latest amendment. The Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) 2019 has sparked a nationwide protest with thousands taking to the streets across the country. Many state governments have already registered their opposition and have announced that they would not implement the Act in their respective territories. These include state governments led by allies of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
Global Implications of India's Citizenship Amendment Act 2019
Russian International Affairs Council, RIAC, Moscow (Russia), 2020
Citizenship Amendment Act 2019 (CAA) in India has underlined the deep division within the country and in the international community. The world press frequently publishing what damage has been done to the India’s settled foreign policy and its global position in the aftermath of CAA. The significant issue is that India steadily moving towards isolation in the global stage and its trusted allies have also questioned India’s constitutional commitment towards minorities rights, secularism and democracy.
Citizenship in India: Some preliminary results of a national survey
‘Citizenship in India: Some preliminary results of a national survey’ Economic and Political Weekly of India, Feb 27, 2010 Subrata Mitra South Asia Institute, Heidelberg University, Germany Abstract Citizenship is a valued resource whose wide dispersal across the population enhances the resilience of a political system. While legal entitlement to citizenship under the laws of the land is a necessary condition, by itself, it does not suffice for the individual to feel the full power and potentials of citizenship. Other complementary factors such as rights, capacity, sentiments, and a sense of moral obligation enhance the sense of citizenship. This article reports the preliminary findings of a survey of a representative sample (n=> 7000) of the Indian population, conducted by Lokniti, CSDS, in July-August 2009, on the basis of questions linked to the principal components of citizenship. The results show a widely dispersed sense of citizenship that largely overcomes the differences resulting from social class, ethnicity, religion, gender and generation. However, the underlying variance, particularly at the level of citizenship across India’s regions, reveal the political limits of the Indian model, and the scope for policies at extending citizenship to sections of the population which are outside its reach. In a comparative perspective, when it comes to ‘making citizens out of subjects’, the Indian ‘experiment’ holds important lessons for post-colonial, multi-cultural societies.
CARIM-India RR2013/26 Dual citizenship in the relationship India-Europe
2016
This paper discusses the politically controversial topic of dual or multiple citizenship in the context of the relationships between India and Europe, and EU member States in particular. The paper first focuses on the attitude of the Indian legislator towards dual citizenship and pays particular attention to the development of a special status for Overseas Indians holding another citizenship. Thereafter it discusses the attitude of Member States of the European Union towards dual or multiple citizenship, and how this attitude has changed in the course of the years. Finally, the paper explores the changes that would occur if India would accept the possibility to possess dual citizenship c.q. if it would considerably increase the rights of Overseas Citizens of India.
IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP AND INDIAN LAWS: DOMESTIC & INTERNATIONAL PROSPECTIVE, Satym International Law, 2021
Citizenship represents the relationship between citizens and the state. It also contains rights and obligations of both and significantly deals with the politics of inclusion and exclusion. Globalization has become a challenge to social and political theory of citizenship, and also poses challenges for welfare state. India is socialist democratic country, and basically a caste ridden society where class differences are very prominent. Poverty, hunger, malnutrition and labour exploitation occur due to inequality in status. The Principle of equality of status has been enshrined in the preamble and signified in fundamental rights. So far as social citizenship rights are concerned, conferred in Part IV of the Constitution, non-justifiable but Judicial system has striving to foster social equality by interpreting fundamental rights and directive principles to enforce constitutional goals of equality, dignity and fraternity. Socialism is very significant to eliminate social inequality, poverty, and labour exploitation. Implementation of directive principles of state policy is necessary to do away to bring social justice to its citizens and equality of status to all its citizens.
GJ #2018, 1, European Citizenship as Rights Claiming, by Ali Emre Benli and Daniele Archibugi
European citizenship, which was once seen as the symbol of European integration, is increasingly perceived as an obstacle to self-government and a threat to national welfare. As European ruling classes fail to provide an adequate response to the tensions that arise from the wider trends of globalization, anti-political movements are gaining support. A significant part of European citizenry is aligning with parties that preach the restoration of national borders and the reinstatement of cultural identity as the source of sovereign power embodied in the nation state. Does the way forward reside in dissolving the European project or reducing the power held by European institutions? In this article, we suggest the opposite. We need to begin by recognizing the significance of European integration as an evolving political experience of immense magnitude. We need to emphasize that Europe today provides citizens with unique means to claim social, political and economic rights by going beyond the borders of their states, create alliances, invoke different conventions and treaties, and debate and contest dominant perspectives in front of diverse audiences. Ultimately, we need to utilize a European citizenship that reinstates political power to citizens towards fostering fresh sentiments for a new form of integration.