The Worst of Anthro Job Ads for 2021 (original) (raw)
2022, American Anthropologist
Every fall, some lucky anthropology departments get to hire. The search for a new colleague happens behind the scenes for a while before it goes public-five-year plans have been written, external reviews have been navigated, lots of conversations have occurred, and some pleading with a dean has taken place. But the first public hint that the department has been successful in its campaign is the job ad. And what a text it is! Written by a committee, endorsed by a department, approved by HR (in some institutions), and then read earnestly and over and over again by job applicants wondering if they should apply. And these job applicants often find themselves wondering: Who wrote this ad? Why do they need so much material from their applicants? Who is actually going to read three writing samples for two hundred applicants? Job applicants might have other questions; they might want to know a salary range, if moving costs will be reimbursed, and if they will in fact be told in a timely fashion whether they made a cut or were rejected. But job seekers are supplicants, and they might feel too vulnerable to ask. There is no way for applicants to point out that the job ads are taking too much time out of the scholarly community's collective time bank. And so into the breach we go-awarding the title of "Worst Job Ad of 2021" to remind departments that job ads can be written with more consideration and care for applicants and that their carelessness has costs that applicants and letter writers are paying (and resenting every moment of). [...]
Related papers
Market share and recent hiring trends in anthropology faculty positions
PloS one, 2018
Between 1985 and 2014, the number of US doctoral graduates in Anthropology increased from about 350 to 530 graduates per year. This rise in doctorates entering the work force along with an overall decrease in the numbers of tenure-track academic positions has resulted in highly competitive academic job market. We estimate that approximately79% of US anthropology doctorates do not obtain tenure-track positions at BA/BS, MA/MS, and PhD institutions in the US. Here, we examine where US anthropology faculty obtained their degrees and where they ultimately end up teaching as tenure-track faculty. Using data derived from the 2014-2015 AnthroGuide and anthropology departmental web pages, we identify and rank PhD programs in terms of numbers of graduates who have obtained tenure-track academic jobs; examine long-term and ongoing trends in the programs producing doctorates for the discipline as a whole, as well as for the subfields of archaeology, bioanthropology, and sociocultural anthropol...
Inaugural Statement from the New Editorial Team
Practicing Anthropology, 2015
We are excited to face the challenge of bringing all anthropologists interested in the use of anthropology together, particularly at a historic juncture: more than half of anthropologists in the United States work outside universities. We particularly want to draw on practitioners' potential to inform scholarship by enticing their participation in a journal different from others where anthropologists tend to publish, using new formats for communication. Practicing Anthropology is a career-oriented publication of the Society for Applied Anthropology that emerged from Sol Tax's goal to establish a vehicle of communication for practitioners and a source of career information for anthropologists working outside academia. With this issue, the Practicing Anthropology Editorship returns to its birthplace at the University of Maryland, where Distinguished Professor Erve Chambers was its first editor.
Divergent Paths to Career Fulfillment in Applied Anthropology
Practicing Anthropology
Despite their academic training, most anthropologists do not work in tenure-track positions in departments of anthropology. While some systematic data indicate where these anthropologists are employed, we know less about their experiences or what led them to work outside the academy. This paper discusses examples of divergent career paths among the special issue contributors and analyzes key themes in their papers. While their histories vary generationally, our authors share commonalities. Many mastered cross-over skills that prepared them to work collaboratively and to apply anthropological insights and methods in research and community settings. Some perceived stigma and barriers to communicating with traditional academic colleagues. Others merged theory and practice to develop pedagogical reforms. Drawing on lessons as mentors in training programs and advocates in our own careers, we recommend that practitioners' narratives be used to re-imagine career options, revise trainin...
Ambiguous Assessment: Critiquing the Anthropology Graduate Admissions Process
This article presents a survey of admissions processes among 43 anthropology departments in the U.S. With the goal of assessing how individual departments make decisions and begin a dialogue about how candidates can be better prepared to submit an application, I conducted a survey of faculty within these departments using email and a web-based survey tool. Additionally, I spoke to prospective doctoral student users of a particular online forum– thegradcafe.com– to assess their understanding of the process and their confidence about admissions. Herein, I further attempt to explain why a transparent admissions process is in the interest of anthropology graduate programs, and suggest how we can emulate efforts made by our colleagues in the humanities to improve the experience for both applicants and faculty.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Related papers
Broadening #MeToo: Tracking Dynamics in Canadian Archaeology Through a Survey on Experiences Within the Discipline, 2020