Stanislav Byshok - Traditional and modernizing themes in the annual Russian presidential addresses to the Federal Assembly (2012-2021) (original) (raw)
2022, Traditions and modernization in the politics and law of Russia, China and Vietnam: International conference proceedings
From 1994 onwards, Russian presidents give annual addresses to the Federal Assembly. In these speeches, state leaders outline the country’s current economic, social, national defense, and international relations conditions and shape specific directions for future progress in these areas. These addresses are aired nationally and are similar to US presidents’ State of the Union addresses or those of the Chinese Communist Party chairman. Since his return to the presidency in 2012, Vladimir Putin has held nine addresses containing both modernizing and traditional themes—the former having to do with rendering Russia able to catch up with the most developed states while the latter emphasizing the country’s uniqueness and the need to preserve its distinct cultural identity in the ever-globalizing world. We assess the contents of Putin’s speeches through a Constructivist lens distinguishing modernizing and traditional tendencies and trying to trace the enduring topics of the president’s interest. Overall, the Russian president, even though considered a conservative by many, in his annual addresses, maintains a balance between the two currents showing that they are not mutually exclusive. Conservative/traditional tendencies in the Russian policies make the country more attractive to conservatives in Western democracies. In contrast, modernizing policies, including advances in arms and technologies and large-scale infrastructure projects, add to the country’s soft power in the eyes of less ideology-driven observers in Asia and elsewhere.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
“Putin’s New Russia: Foreign Policy”
My research paper attempts to concisely answer what are the main ideological schools of thought behind Russia's Foreign Policy agenda and by whom. Additionally, analyzing why the concentration of foreign policy prescriptions remain solely in the Executive Branch. I found that the pre-curser for power concentration within the Executive Branch was due to Yeltsin's institutional architecture.
Europe-Asia Studies, 2020
This study analyses official Russian foreign policy discourses to contribute to our understanding of how Russia portrays its role in world politics and vis-à-vis neighbouring states. Building on previous studies, we offer a new, comprehensive analysis of Foreign Policy Concepts and the annual Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly during President Vladimir Putin's third term (2012-2018). By systematically coding these documents, counting references to particular discourses and undertaking a careful interpretation of the texts, we provide insights about three broader discourses related to foreign policy: the world order and sovereignty; civilisation, identity and values; and economics and modernisation. THE RETURN OF VLADIMIR PUTIN TO THE RUSSIAN PRESIDENCY IN 2012 saw a renewed interest in official foreign policy discourses. Commentators claimed that the beginning of Putin's third term (2012-2018) marked a turn in Russian foreign policy discourse away from the pragmatism that was often seen as the hallmark of his first two terms as
Putin had a more modest foreign policy rhetoric and seemed to be far more pragmatic than Primakov during his first term of presidency. However, such conditions did not last long and Russian government chose a more assertive stance once political stability was ensured and economic growth showed signs of improvement. In the following article we have assumed that similar patterns of thinking and acting which have not been necessarily subject to considerable changes as a result of vibrant conditions can be found in Russian foreign policy. It seems as if guiding principles of foreign policy are deeply embedded in political culture of the country. Despite some tactical changes to compensate for country"s backwardness and economic difficulties as a historical tradition, Russians have never retreated from claiming the status of a globally recognized great power and international rule maker. In this article using descriptive-analytical method we have examined the following: "Despite domestic and international ups and downs, how can continuity in the rhetoric and action of Russian foreign policy since 2004 be explained?" Our hypothetical answer to this question is that: "Russian foreign policy has very deep ideational roots influencing the nature and identity of the state, which have been shaped through centuries by natural-geographical characteristics of the land, and historical and intellectual developments."
GWU Russia Program Papers, 2023
It has long been noted that when public figures and politicians start talking obsessively about their country’s great “originality,” “special path,” or “unique mission in the world,” it is a sure sign they are facing mounting problems with forging a modern democratic polity, civic nation, and respectable international identity. Contemporary Russia is a case in point. Its new foreign policy doctrine, signed into law by President Vladimir Putin on March 31, 2023, is a truly remarkable document, as it has for the first time declared at the highest official level Russia’s civilizational uniqueness.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.