Integrity testing and the prediction of counterproductive behaviours in the military (original) (raw)
Related papers
Military Incompetence Revisited : The Dark Side of Professionalism
In 1997, Donna Winslow documented how the Canadian Airborne Regiment's (CAR) culture and initiation rites led to morally incompetent, disgraceful behaviour in the field, including the beating to death of a Somali youth. The unit's culture was based on a stereotyped form of hypermasculine warrior, which had no place in any field operation and so deeply rooted was this culture that the government disbanded the CAR rather than seeking to change its leaders and practices. One aspect of the unit culture is far from peculiar in military and civilian organizations : a belief in the need to rally round to protect peers, subordinates and superior officers from outside enquiry and challenge, and hostility to any 'whistle blowing' about incompetence and/or wrongdoing , which is seen as a betrayal of the unit. 2 Thus, incompetence can involve a breach of technical professional and/ or moral rules that underpin the military profession. A professional, but morally, not just technically, incompetent military can betray not only those who deserve protection in the field, such as civilian non-combatants, but those within the organization to whom it owes a duty of care, not least young soldiers under training. For twenty years the British Army has had to deal with the incidents at the Deepcut soldier training establishment and respond to a number of enquiries investigating the deaths of a number of trainee soldiers and the question of whether or not their deaths were suicides. Issues arising included : whether there was a sufficient number and quality of officers especially NCOs in the establishment, and whether it was wise to place priority on The author would like to thank Dr. Karl Ydén for advice on the themes of this article and for the Swedish Armed Forces for financial support (grant AF9225337) of the research that underpins it.
Ethical Lapses and the Military Profession: Three Problems and a Solution
In a recent issue of this journal, we published an article titled " Fault Lines of the American Military Profession ". Donald S. Travis subsequently wrote a Dipustatio Sine Fine rejoinder that raised a number of criticisms of our piece and suggested several ways forward. For our part, we detect three serious problems in Travis's analysis and offer a single syncretic response. Our solution builds on the insights of Travis's critique while avoiding the pitfalls of his specific line of reasoning. We conclude by urging others to continue to debate and research these very consequential and timely issues. Recently in this journal, we published an article titled " Fault Lines of the American Military Profession " (Crosbie & Kleykamp, 2017). Donald S. Travis subsequently wrote a Dipustatio Sine Fine rejoinder that raises a number of criticisms of our piece and suggested several ways forward. In what follows, we respond to his critiques while offering critiques of our own which cast doubt on his proposed alternative. Ultimately, however, we extend our thanks to Travis for advancing the debate, and
Ethical Lapses and the Military Profession
Armed Forces & Society, 2018
In a recent issue of this journal, we published an article titled “Fault Lines of the American Military Profession”. Donald S. Travis subsequently wrote a Dipustatio Sine Fine rejoinder that raised a number of criticisms of our piece and suggested several ways forward. For our part, we detect three serious problems in Travis’s analysis and offer a single syncretic response. Our solution builds on the insights of Travis’s critique while avoiding the pitfalls of his specific line of reasoning. We conclude by urging others to continue to debate and research these very consequential and timely issues.
Psychology under fire: Adversarial operational psychology and psychological ethics
Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 2012
The 9/11 attacks on the United States have motivated psychologists to advance counterterrorism and related operations through psychological principles and skills. These operational psychologists seek to legitimize adversarial interventions against targets by prioritizing societal welfare over traditional, individual-focused principles of psychological ethics. In this essay, we distinguish adversarial operational psychology, which facilitates deceptive and coercive operations, from collaborative operational psychology, which optimizes personnel performance in high-risk operations. Our analysis finds that adversarial operational psychology is largely unsupported by the American Psychological Association Ethics Code, that its potential benefits are exceeded by the likelihood of irreversible harms, and that its military necessity is undemonstrated. We offer a three-factor framework for distinguishing between adversarial and collaborative operational psychology, and we recommend institutional separation of these roles so that professional psychologists do not serve in adversarial capacities.
In a Dutch military trainee sample, we investigated the validity of overt and personality-based integrity tests, HEXACO personality dimensions, and general mental ability, for predicting self (N 5 336) and supervisor (N 5 175) ratings of behavioral integrity. Both self and supervisor ratings were predicted by integrity and personality tests, but not by general mental ability. Incremental validity was partially observed for specific tests of integrity and personality. Findings contribute to various underresearched areas in the domain of integrity testing, as they show evidence of validity (1) for predicting a rarely observed criterion (ratings of behavioral integrity), (2) beyond two alternative types of predictors in personnel selection, (3) in a military setting, and (4) outside North America.
An Examination of "Adversarial" Operational Psychology
Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 2015
Operational psychology has remained under pressure from its critics. Arrigo, Eidelson, and Bennett (2012) proposed a split of operational psychology activities into 2 categories: "collaborative" and "adversarial," on the basis of their concerns that certain professional activities are unethical and inappropriate for psychology practitioners. Arguments to separate these activities are examined along with the authors' recommendations to bar psychologists from practicing in areas deemed "adversarial" by the Arrigo et al. criteria. Implications for military, government, public safety, and industrial psychologists are discussed. The applicability of the American Psychological Association's (2010) Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct is also addressed.
Military Psychology: Time to embrace a front-line diplomatic role
Scientia Militaria: South African Journal of Military Studies, 2022
The weapon systems created for the purpose of fighting the enemy in World War I caused terrible losses of human life on all sides of the conflict. However, World War I was also the event that gave birth to what became the field of Military Psychology. This position article, briefly tracing the development of the field, encourages the development of an expanded scope for this sub-discipline of Psychology. In its infancy, the role of Military Psychology was the selection and placement of soldiers based on a series of cognitive tests. After World War II, the scope of Military Psychology quickly expanded exponentially into areas such as leadership development, psychological warfare, and the enhancement of morale, motivation, resilience, and human factors, as military psychology with its sub-disciplines became integrated into national military forces to enhance the capabilities of the modern fighting soldier psychologically, physically and technologically. As the discipline matured, its present role can be described as to create soldiers whose skills sets greatly surpass those of their predecessors in meeting the ever-increasing complex demands of the modern battlefield. In recent years, Afghanistan and Iraq illustrated that conventional warfare tactics are rendered all but obsolete by small numbers of militia fighters with improvised devices and even outdated weapons in a demonstration of human ingenuity trumping advanced technology and well-equipped, superior military forces that inevitably failed dismally to subdue insurgent opposition forces. Even the destruction of the Islamic State in Libya (ISIL) and the Islamic State in Syria (ISIS) forces serves to emphasise that the world can no longer afford to continue armed conflict as a means to settle territorial and international disagreements because these eventually become the rationalisation for ongoing, unnecessary conflict. In its contribution to the defence role, alternatives to engagement in ill-advised military options must involve the strategic deployment of Military Psychology in a front-line capacity to research, comprehend and then, through diplomatic means, counter the psychological and ideological factors at play in creating the world's current conflict areas. If not, an even greater catastrophe will arise from ongoing ill-informed, ideologydriven international military interventions around the world.
Journal of curriculum and teaching, 2022
The urgency of the issue of the development of integrity and intolerance to corruption in the system of preparation for military service is becoming increasingly publicised, since the number of such negative social phenomena, manifested in the form of abuse of power or official position to obtain illegal material benefits, is constantly growing, which as a result provokes an imbalance in the main paramilitary structures of Ukraine, in particular the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The purpose of this study is to analyse the current systems of educating socially positive qualities that are necessary to prevent the spread of corruption, to highlight their disadvantages and solutions that will help to overcome them. This research aimed at studying the sphere of military security and integrity of officers who are the personnel of military bodies was conducted using such methods as logical analysis, comparative analysis, the formal-legal, synthesis, deduction, analysis of scientific literature. The result of this study is to identify and highlight the theoretical and practical foundations of the mechanism of educating socially important qualities and intolerance to corruption in the military during preparation for military service, their effectiveness in affirming in the minds of each officer the main principles and foundations for countering abuse of power and obtaining benefits of various kinds. The research is aimed at developing and educating intolerance to corruption and other socially dangerous phenomena in preparing for military service, since in the future this may lead to a decrease in the authority of a particular structure and in the level of trust in it from the population, the introduction of methods that will improve and make such preventive systems more effective.