The needs of disabled fans must not be ignored when sports stadiums reopen to spectators (original) (raw)

“Will it ever be completely safe to be in a crowd again?”: the return of disabled supporters to football stadiums during COVID-19

Managing Sport and Leisure

Our aim in this short article is to provide an analysis of the implications of reopening football stadium doors to a group that have not been at the forefront of management considerationdisabled spectators. In order to achieve this aim, we uphold a social model approach to disability to review the current spectator sport situation across English professional football and outline the problems posed for disabled fans. We then provide the context to disabled people's experiences in football fandom which have often been unsatisfactory. This context then underpins a series of implications that will arise from the reopening of stadia in England. To conclude this commentary, we provide several management recommendations that we argue should facilitate a more disability-inclusive restart for spectator sport.

Fitzgerald, H. and Long, J. (2017) Integration or Special Provision? Positioning disabled people in sport and leisure. In Long, J., Fletcher, T. and Watson, B. (eds) Sport, Leisure and Social Justice. London: Routledge, pp.126-138.

In the context of 'Sport for All' we begin by considering the dominant understandings of disability found within society, the medical and social models. Despite a somewhat simplistic binary, these models speak to the different ways in which disabled people are ‘visible’ in sport and leisure. Attention then focuses on separate and integrated provision and we consider the different circumstances and identify the problems and merits associated with each type of provision. In doing this, it is not our intention to present one type of provision as better than the other and our coverage is not exhaustive. Rather we hope this paper offers an insight into the possibilities and challenges that emerge when enabling disabled people to participate in sport and leisure.

Major sporting events and geographies of disability

Urban Geography

Major sporting events for athletes with disabilities have become part of a strategic agenda to create positive social legacies for those typically marginalized in their communities. These events are subject to strict guidelines set forth by the International Paralympic Committee to deliver broad based accessibility. In some cases, changes to accessibility are temporary, where in others upgrades remain as permanent fixtures for venues, transportation, and public spaces. However, the temporality at the heart of major event projects can also work against long-term, sustainable improvements to the material conditions persons with disabilities face as they experience the urban realm. In this paper, we draw upon case studies of the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games and the Toronto 2015 Parapan American Games to explore the value of major sporting events in delivering urban accessibility improvements and offer a critical commentary on the limitations of the event project to herald sustainable change.

Facilitating inclusivity and broadening understandings of access at football clubs: the role of disabled supporter associations

European Sport Management Quarterly, 2016

Research question: To which extent do Disabled Supporters Associations (DSAs) contribute to improve access of fans with disabilities to football? This research question addresses two interrelated gaps: The lack of attention to supporters in European policies on inclusion in and through sport, and the excessive focus on physical barriers over other dimensions of access in both policy and research on disability and sport. Research methods: The study uses visual auto-ethnography. Seven disabled supporters, members of three different DSAs at football clubs in England took part in the study. They were asked to take photographs of their life as a supporter over a period of eight weeks, and were interviewed at the end to discuss and clarify the meaning of the pictures. Results and Findings: Attention to physical spaces is not enough to ensure inclusivity in the stands. Further dimensions need attention by clubs, including knowledge, relationships and participation, and power of advocacy. DSAs have the potential to play a pivotal role in helping clubs improving their provisions for disabled fans, since they act as both a social forum a point of contact for clubs, but they are hampered for their lack or resources and clubs' almost exclusive focus on physical access. Nind and Seale's multi-dimensional model of access for the disabled is one useful way of interpreting these results. Implications: Conceptual understandings of access and inclusion can be broadened by using Nind and Seale's model. Policies addressing inclusion in football should focus not only on those doing sport, but also on those spectating.

Toward an understanding of the needs of sport spectators with disabilities

2006

Linkage between the current study and existing literature ………………………... Limitations of the study …………………………………………………………… 140 Areas for Future Research ………………………………………………………… Managerial Implications …………………………………………………………... 145 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………….... CHAPTER TWO REVIEW OF LITERATURE This chapter is presented by first reviewing the disability literature, including an overview of the Americans with Disabilities Act, an examination of how the sport and recreation industries are continuing to implement the ADA, and a discussion of the emerging awareness to provide an enhanced service experience for guests with disabilities. Next, a review of the service quality literature is provided including a discussion of how the existing literature informed the study. Americans with Disabilities Act Overview of the Americans with Disabilities Act The ADA was enacted to provide a national mandate to eliminate discrimination faced by individuals with disabilities on a day-today basis (42 U.S.C. 12101(b)). The ADA prohibits discrimination in employment, public services, and places of public accommodations operated by private entities (Wong, 2002). The key provisions applicable to sport facilities are Title II and Title III (Grady & Andrew, 2003). Title II mandates that public entities, including state and local governments, give people with disabilities an equal opportunity to benefit from all of their programs, services, and activities (42 U.S.C.12132). Title III provides protection for individuals with disabilities seeking access to places of public accommodation (42 U.S.C. 1282) and prohibits a public accommodation from denying people with disabilities the opportunity to benefit from goods or services, or by providing people with disabilities with different or separate goods or services (28 C.F.R. 36 et seq., 2000). The requirements for facility accessibility, including sport stadiums, are laid out in Title II and Title III of ADA as well as in the federal regulations implementing the ADA. The ADA has two distinct standards for stadium accessibility, depending on date of construction and date of first occupancy. For newly constructed "assembly areas" set for first occupancy after January 26, 1993, and for alterations occurring after January 26, 1992 (referred to as "newly constructed" facilities), there are far more rigorous accessibility requirements (28 C.F.R. § § 36.401-.402, 36.406 (2003)). These requirements include wheelchair accessible seating, companion seats, comparable lines of

Enabling Inclusive Sport Participation: Effects of Disability and Support Needs on Constraints to Sport Participation

Leisure Sciences, 2016

Framed by a social approach to disability and leisure constraints theory, this paper presents the results of a national study examining the constraints to sport participation for people with disability. Responses were obtained from a multi-platform questionnaire survey capturing data on constraints to participation, dimensions of disability, and level of support needs. The Exploratory Factor Analysis identified five structural together with intrapersonal and interpersonal constraint factors. While intrapersonal and interpersonal considerations were found to constrain sport participation and nonparticipation, the five structural factors had the most significant constraining impact on sport participation. The findings showed that disability type and level of support needs explain significant variations in constraints to participation and nonparticipation. When the 2-Way MANOVA included type of disability and level of support needs as contingent independent variables, the level of support needs was the most significant indicator of the likelihood of having constraints to participation or nonparticipation. EFFECTS OF DISABILITY AND SUPPORT NEEDS 3 3 Enabling Inclusive Sport Participation: Effects of Disability and Support Needs on Constraints to Sport Participation Article 30 of the United Nations' (2006) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPWD) states that its signatories "…recognize the right of persons with disabilities to take part on an equal basis with others in cultural life" (defined as participation in recreation, leisure, the arts, sport and tourism). The CRPWD is based on social model conceptualisations of disability now used by more than 160 nations. The CRPWD reinforces disability discrimination policies and legislation that many countries have in place to enshrine the right of citizens to a cultural life. These include, for example, the US's Americans with Disability Act 1990, Australia's Disability Discrimination Act 1992, and the UK's Equality Act 2010. Despite these enabling policy initiatives, people with disability (PwD) experience significant discrimination, exceptionally lower levels of employment and significantly higher levels of poverty than the general population (World Health Organization & World Bank, 2011). In relation to sport, studies in the U.S., Australia and the UK (e.g., Verdonschot, De Witte, Reichrath, Buntinx, & Curfs, 2009) have found that PwD participate at lower rates than the general population in all forms of cultural life. The low participation rates of PwD are particularly notable in sport activities (e.g., Jong, Vanreusel, & Driel, 2011). When access to sport is constrained, inhibited or denied, PwD are not able to realise the benefits of participation available to other population groups (Driver & Bruns, 1999). PwD's levels of participation in sport are reflective of many considerations, including historical contexts, discrimination issues and legal approaches (DePauw & Gavron, 2005). To create more inclusive practices and counter historical influences, a reformed sporting agenda that moves from focusing on the deficits of individuals towards understanding the complexity of sporting practices through a social model approach to disability has been suggested (Misener & Darcy, 2014).

Rio 2016 and disability – an analysis on the Sport-For-

This paper investigates how the legacy of the 2016 Paralympic Games, in Rio de Janeiro, has been discussed on the Facebook page ‘Cidade Olímpica.’ The City Council of Rio De Janeiro manages this page, which uses the Sport-For-Development discourse in order to disclose information about projects that are being developed in the city, and to justify the investments that are made with public money. Furthermore, the main objective of this paper is to identify whether the Sport-For-Development discourse has been used to discuss the legacies for disabled people. This study was developed during the 2014 FIFA World Cup because it was during that period that the Brazilian government released details of some of the main projects for the Olympics and then presented the great planned impacts of these legacies. The season of that mega event was important for the country in order to promote Brazil as a strong brand for tourism and sport for development. Consequentially, this period represented an opportunity to address the Paralympic legacy topic, similar to the entire legacy of the Games and their impacts on society.

Inclusive by design: transformative services and sport-event accessibility

his paper examines the service dimensions required to be inclusive of people with access needs within a major-sport event context. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities seeks to counter disability discrimination and enable citizenship rights of people with disabilities, including access to goods and services, across all dimensions of social participation including major-sport events (e.g. Olympic and Paralympic Games, world cups in football, cricket and rugby union). Providing for people with disability and access needs is also an emerging tourism focus with initiatives addressing accessible tourism included in the World Tourism Organizations mission and recent strategic destination plans. To enhance the understanding of service delivery for an accessible tourism market in a major-sport event context, a case study of the Vancouver Fan Zone for the FIFA Womens World Cup Canada, 2015 is analyzed through the lens of transformative services. From this analysis future research directions are identified to benefit those with access needs who wish to participate in major-sport events.