Achieving Sustained Virologic Response in Liver Transplant Recipients with Hepatitis C Decreases Risk of Decline in Renal Function (original) (raw)
Related papers
Liver Transplantation, 2014
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is associated with renal complications. We aimed to determine whether a sustained virological response (SVR) was associated with improvements in renal function (RF) in liver transplant (LT) recipients treated for HCV. Changes in RF were compared 1, 3, and 5 years after therapy as a function of the stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) before treatment (BT). Variables associated with renal dysfunction [RD; 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD-4) value 60 mL/minute] at the last follow-up (LFU) were evaluated for all treated LT patients with a minimum follow-up of at least 1 year since the end of treatment (EOT; n 5 175). There were 99 patients with stage 2 CKD BT (MDRD-4 value 60-89 mL/minute/1.73 m 2 ), and an improvement in RF was observed more frequently among SVR patients versus nonresponders (NRs). The median changes in the MDRD-4 values BT to 1, 3, and 5 years after treatment were 20.5, 4.5, and 9.4 mL/minute for the SVR patients and 21, 20.3, and 21.5 mL/minute for the NRs (P 5 0.61, P 5 0.06, and P 5 0.004, respectively). RD was present in 31% of the patients at the LFU at a median of 3.8 years after EOT (range 1-9 years). The follow-up did not differ between SVR patients and NRs. RD was present at the LFU in 19% of SVR patients versus 40% of NRs (P 5 0.002). In the multivariate analysis, RD at the LFU was associated with NRs [relative risk (RR) 3.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5 1.3-11.23, P 5 0.01], EOT MDRD-4 values (RR 5 1.022, 95% CI 5 1.001-1.04, P 5 0.04), and female sex (RR 5 5.6, 95% CI 5 1.84-17.5, P 5 0.002). In conclusion, SVR leads to improved RF in HCVinfected LT recipients with stage 2 CKD BT. Liver Transpl 20:25-34, 2014.
Effect of Hepatitis C Treatment on Renal Function in Liver Transplant Patients
Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology
Background and Aims: Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) is uniformly recurrent after liver transplant (LT) and recurrence is associated with an increased risk of mortality. Immunosuppressive medications increase the risk of chronic kidney disease, and the presence of chronic kidney disease presents a challenge for HCV treatment in LT recipients. The aim of this study was to assess changes in glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) of LT recipients receiving HCV treatment. Methods: This is a retrospective study of LT patients who received HCV treatment between 2015 and 2016 (n = 60). The outcomes of interest were differences in serum creatinine levels and in GFR, measured at treatment initiation and at 24 weeks after treatment. The average age of the patients was 59 years-old, and 17% were cirrhotic and 67% were treatment-experienced. All patients received sofosbuvir/ledipasvir without ribavirin. Results: All patients achieved sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12). At baseline, 55% of patients had GFR <60 mL/min per 1.73 m 2. Among those patients, GFR did not change in 18%, 33% had improved GFR, and 48% had worsened GFR. Up to 45% of the patients had a GFR >60 mL/min per 1.73 m 2. Among those patients, GFR did not change in 81%, and 19% had worsened GFR. In the entire cohort, 65% of patients had improved or stable GFR and 35% had worsened GFR. The average change in serum creatinine between baseline and 24 weeks was 0.10 (p = 0.18). Conclusions: This study showed improved or unchanged GFR in 65% and worsened GFR in 35% of LT recipients who achieved SVR12. Worsening of GFR was more frequently encountered in those with impaired renal function at baseline. Caution should be used when treating HCV in LT recipients, especially those with baseline status of renal impairment.
Pathogens and Immunity, 2020
Background: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy among hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected kidney transplant recipients is associated with short-term improvement in protein/creatinine (P/C) ratios, but how HCV cure affects long-term graft outcomes remains unknown.Methods: This is a retrospective follow-up study of 59 HCV-infected patients who underwent kidney transplant at the University of Alabama at Birmingham between 2007-2015 who were followed until the end of 2017. We examined the association of DAA-induced HCV cure with graft failure or death by survival analyses (Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression).Redsults: Mean age was 55 years, 73% were African American, and 68% were male. Median baseline creatinine was 1.4 mg/dL, P/C ratio was 0.5, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 59 mL/min. Of those who received DAA, 24 (83%) achieved cure. The remaining 5 DAA patients (17%) did not have documented evidence of sustained virologic response (SVR). Overall, 19 (32%) patients expe...
The impact of hepatitis C virus infection on long-term outcome in renal transplant patients
The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2011
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of hepatitis C virus infection on patient and graft survival and liver function in renal transplant patients. 1811 renal transplant patients were included in this study. One hundred renal transplant patients (5.5%) were anti-hepatitis C virus-positive. We evaluated demographic, clinical, biochemical, and serological data of patients and compared patient and graft survivals between hepatitis C virus-positive and -negative renal transplant patients. The median follow-up period was 35.7 months. One hundred (5.5%) patients were anti-hepatitis C virus-positive. There were no differences between anti-hepatitis C virus-positive and -negative renal transplant patients regarding age, etiology of renal disease, number of pre-transplant blood transfusions, and hepatitis B virus coinfection rate. Rate of graft loss in anti-hepatitis C virus-positive renal transplant patients was significantly higher than in anti-hepatitis C virus-negative patien...
American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1997
Q Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in end-stage renal failure patients. It is not known whether the prognosis of HCV-positive patients differs depending on whether they remain on dialysis or receive a kidney transplant. To address this question, we compared the outcomes of HCV-positive renal transplant recipients and HCV-positive patients who were acceptable candidates but had not yet received transplants. We reviewed all patients referred to our institution for renal transplantation evaluation between January 1992 and December 1995. Anti-HCV antibody was detected in 151 of 2,053 (7.4%) patients. HCV-positive patients were more often male (74% v 56%; P < 0.0001), black (68% v 49%; P = 0.001), unemployed (87% v 74%; P = 0.0004), on dialysis (88% v 78%; P = 0.0026), and on dialysis longer (30 ± 44 months v 13 ± 23 months; P = 0.0001) than HCV-negative patients. We determined the outcomes of HCV-positive patients who had at least 2 years' follow-up. Thirty-three HCVpositive patients received kidney transplants (group I); 25 HCV-positive patients were acceptable transplant candidates but had not yet received an allograft (group II). Group I and II HCV-positive patients were similar with respect to age, race, duration of dialysis, cause of renal failure, prevalence of heart disease, and results of liver function tests. Survival was significantly decreased in group II versus group I (P = 0.043). Our study showed that HCVpositive renal transplant recipients had a better survival than similar HCV-positive patients awaiting transplantation.
Effect of Kidney Transplantation on Outcomes among Patients with Hepatitis C
2015
The long-term outcome of kidney transplantation in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and end stage renal disease (ESRD) is not well described. We retrospectively identified 230 HCV-infected patients using enzyme immunoassay and nucleic acid testing obtained during the transplant evaluation. Of 207 patients who had a liver biopsy before transplant, 44 underwent 51 follow-up liver biopsies at approximately 5-year intervals either while on the waitlist for a kidney or after kidney transplantation. Advanced fibrosis was present in 10 % of patients biopsied, identifying a population that may warrant consideration for combined liver-kidney transplantation. Kidney transplantation does not seem to accelerate liver injury; 77 % of kidney recipients who underwent follow-up biopsies showed stable or improved liver histology. There was a higher risk for death during the first 6 months after transplant, but undergoing transplantation conferred a long-term survival advantage over rem...
Hepatitis monthly, 2011
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection occursin 0% to 51% of dialysis patients, and manyHCV-positive patients are urged to undergo kidney transplantation. However, the outcome of renal transplantation in HCV-positive recipients is unknown. Our review aimed to address the outcomesof renal transplantation recipients (RTRs)following kidney transplantation. We selected studies that used the adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% CI of all-cause mortality and graft loss in HCV-positive compared with HCV-negative RTRs as study endpoints. Cox proportional hazard analysis was usedin all studies to calculate the independent effects of HCV infection on RTR outcomes. Sixteen retrospective cohort studies and 2 clinical trials were selected for our review. Sixteen studies were related to patient survival, and 12 examined graft survival. The combined hazard ratio in HCV-infected recipients was 1.69-fold (1.33-1.97, p < 0.0001) and 1.56 times (1.22-2.004, p < 0.0001) greaterthan that of HCV-negativ...
Changing pattern of chronic hepatitis C in renal transplant patients over 20 years
European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2019
Background The prevalence and clinical epidemiological profile of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have changed over time. Aim This study aimed to evaluate these changes in renal transplant recipients (RTx) comparing two different decades. Materials and methods RTx with HCV referred to RTx from 1993 to 2003 (A) and from 2004 to 2014 (B) were studied retrospectively. The demographic and clinical characteristics and different outcomes were compared between groups A and B. Variables that were statistically different were tested for inclusion in a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model predicting patient survival within the group. Results Among 11 715 RTx, the prevalence of HCV was 7% in A and 4.9% in B. In the more recent period (B), the mean age was older (46.2 vs. 39.5 years), with more males (72 vs. 60.7%), larger number of deceased donors (74 vs. 55%), higher percentage of previous RTx (27 vs. 13.7%), less frequent history of blood transfusion (81 vs. 89.4%), lower prevalence of hepatitis B virus coinfection (4.7 vs. 21.4%), and higher percentage of cirrhotic patients (13 vs. 5%). Patients of group B more frequently underwent treatment of HCV (29 vs. 9%), less frequently used azathioprine (38.6 vs. 60.7%) and cyclosporine (11.8 vs. 74.7%), and more frequently used tacrolimus (91 vs. 27.3%). In the outcomes, graft loss showed no difference between periods; however, decompensation was more frequent (P = 0.007) and patients' survival was lower in the more recent period (P = 0.032) compared with the earlier one. Conclusion The profile of RTx with HCV has changed over the last 20 years. Despite a decrease in the prevalence of HCV, new clinical challenges have emerged, such as more advanced age and a higher prevalence of cirrhosis.