Between the instrumental and the substantive: Paradoxes of a “common” project (original) (raw)
Related papers
Profits and purpose: Organizational tensions in social enterprises
Intangible Capital
Purpose: This paper aims to explore the way in which three indigenous social enterprises from Guatemala, Mexico and Peru, solve the paradox of simultaneously producing social and economic value, which creates organizational tensions.Design/methodology/approach: This research follows a qualitative method based on a case study research strategy. Three different data collection techniques are applied: Analysis of internal reports, direct observation, and semi-structured interviews with relevant stakeholder, mainly employees and managers.Findings: Indigenous social enterprises deal with organizational tensions by adopting different organizational structures and privileging one dimension over the other (social or economic) in decision making Social implications. Indigenous social enterprises generate quality of life and reduce historical exclusion patterns by strengthening local economy dynamics through social innovation.Originality/value: Social innovations, appreciated in different org...
Reconciling social enterprise: beyond the paradox perspective
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 2022
PurposeThe paper aims to critically review the increasingly taken-for-granted view of social enterprise (SE) as inherently paradoxical and tackles the research question as follows: are the tensions experienced by SE and social entrepreneurs (SEnt) actually paradoxical and if not, what are the implications for theory and practice?Design/methodology/approachA paradox theory (PT) approach has been utilized to explore the implications, validity and helpfulness of the paradox perspective in understanding and managing the tensions that are inherent in SE.FindingsConceptualizing the primary tension of doing social good through commercial activity as a paradox is argued to be a limiting misnomer that conspires to reify and perpetuate the tensions that SE and SEnt have to manage. Drawing upon PT, the findings of the paper reconceptualize these tensions as myths, dilemmas and dialectics, which are subsequently used to develop a more complete ontological framework of the challenges that arise ...
SOCIAL BUSINESS DILEMMAS IN BRAZIL: REDE ASTA CASE
Social businesses seek financial, social and even environmental results. Academic knowledge on how such organizations operate, however, has emerged more recently. This article sought to investigate qualitatively the main tensions and dilemmas occurring throughout the history of Rede Asta, a pioneer social business in direct catalog sales of artisanal products in Brazil. Results indicate the Rede Asta managers have experienced tensions and dilemmas in three of the four categories identified by Smith, Gonin, and Besharov (2013): social and financial performance, organizational aspects and learning. One of the dilemmas involves organizational aspects and learning, since Asta achieves feasibility with two organizations: a nonprofit association and a for-profit corporation. On perceptions of belonging, stakeholders declared they felt they were a part of the organization’s social and environmental goals; some even as activists.
Squaring the challenge: reconciling business and ethical goals in social enterprises
2013
The narrative surrounding social enterprise, both politically and theoretically, tends to emphasise a narrow definition and a set of expectations as to their role and meaning, generally reducible to organisations able to reconcile business and ethical aspirations. Policies devised to support the development of these organisations are generally based on the assumption that social enterprises have to be self-financing and that their developmental pathways lead to financial sustainability, generally achievable through trade. The experiences of organisations encountered in the course of this research
The notion of social responsibility in social enterprises and non-profit organizations
Corporate Governance: Search for the advanced practices
This contribution focuses on forms of CSR of the likes of NPOs, social enterprises, cooperative firms, and multi-stakeholder governance. Their common feature is that they all are organizational types which do not maximize profits and add the social dimension in the operation and aims of the organization as fundamental elements. The explicit recognition of a social dimension can, therefore, be studied at different levels, starting from basic institutions, such as control rights and governance, up to strategic and operational dimensions such as organizational routines, managerial models and employment relations. The issue to be examined, in these respects, is how these firms design their governance consistently with the instrumental role of profit and other commercial objectives, and how the role of profit is reconciled with the main societal aims.
Overcoming organisational tensions : strategic actions taken by social enterprises
2018
This dissertation looks to explain the response of social enterprise in the face of organisational tensions from the implemented of strategic actions, mainly through company culture, organisational structure, and hiring process. Organisational tensions emerge through an organisation’s commitment to contradictory structures, cultures, practices and processes. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the strategic decisions taken by social enterprises operating in Portugal and explain how they allow them to deal with the internal tensions. To that purpose, a qualitative study was conducted based on semi-structured, face-to-face interviews to managers of social enterprise, and support through analysis of secondary data. The research concluded that the strategic actions helped the enterprises by ensuring a consistent level of internal communication, through the construction of a holographic company culture, and a hiring process that identified potential employees with a commitment to social...
2021
Throughout the past decade, the novel concept of social investments has increasingly gained footing within the Danish welfare arena. The marketization of social security services appears to be inextricably linked with ideological disputes, a fact that became more evident than ever in connection to the establishment of the public social investment fund, Den Sociale Investeringsfond (DSI), in 2018. DSI’s activities implicate numerous actors across different sectors who all hold distinct expectations and perceptions of DSI and vice versa. Through a critical and normative inquiry, this paper seeks to examine DSI’s approach to responsible stakeholder management as well as to assess the fund from the perspective of corporate ethics and legitimacy. More specifically, the research focuses on DSI’s capacity for practicing moral values through an interpretation of the fund’s processes of deliberation and dialogical practices with its stakeholders. Empirically, the study is grounded in an individual interview with a consultant from DSI’s secretariat as well as a collection of textual sources, e.g., legislation files, articles, and public hearing statements. The findings indicate that DSI’s legal construction as a public fund poses a liability for the fund’s legitimacy in certain aspects. As a pioneer in an emergent field, DSI and its activities are faced with much skepticism from various actors, including its founding body, the Ministry of Social Affairs. This prompts DSI to pursue a strategy of legitimacy, concerned with instrumental and consequential demands, rather than altruistic and moral ideals. The study concludes that the field of social investments is still emergent and that outputs need to be well-documented with an eye to the distinct features of both economic and social evaluation methods, in order to legitimately respond to the different demands from the surrounding environment.