Introduction: Unraveling the Tangle State-Society Negoations over Natural Resources in Himachal Pradesh (original) (raw)
2001, Himalaya the Journal of the Association For Nepal and Himalayan Studies
AI-generated Abstract
This paper explores the complex negotiations between state and society regarding natural resource management in Himachal Pradesh, particularly focusing on the Great Himalayan National Park. It examines the impact of public demonstrations on policy decisions, the historical context of land rights, and the interplay between conservation efforts and local livelihoods. The authors underscore the need for broader representation of diverse geographic and socioeconomic conditions in research, and highlight critical areas yet to be addressed, such as agricultural changes, hydropower projects, and urban development.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
459_Hponkanrazi Wildlife Sanctuary_Web_20 Dec 2016.pdf
v Introduction 1 Governance Principles 2 Study Area 3 Methods 5 Results 7 Community Perceptions of the Hponkanrazi Wildlife Sanctuary, Myanmar 8 Park management staff's perceptions regarding community participation and governance 12 Conclusions and Discussion 14 References 16 iv Acknowledgements This project was funded by HI-LIFE. Thanks to Bandana Shakya for her encouragement and inputs, and to Brij Rathore for reviewing and commenting on the paper. v
Hponkanrazi Wildlife Sanctuary; Two Perspectives from the ground
v Introduction 1 Governance Principles 2 Study Area 3 Methods 5 Results 7 Community Perceptions of the Hponkanrazi Wildlife Sanctuary, Myanmar 8 Park management staff's perceptions regarding community participation and governance 12 Conclusions and Discussion 14 References 16 iv Acknowledgements This project was funded by HI-LIFE. Thanks to Bandana Shakya for her encouragement and inputs, and to Brij Rathore for reviewing and commenting on the paper. v
The parvati and the tragopan: conservation and development in the Great Himalayan National Park
2001
ABSTRACT In 1999 villagers in the Kulu valley in the state of Himachal Pradesh in northern India lost their ancestral rights to graze animals and collect medicinal plants in the area. This blow to their livelihood resulted from the creation of the Great Himalayan National Park, which carved out a vast area for wildlife conservation at the expense of resource use by local residents. However, after excluding villagers from the Park, a part of this protected area was released for the construction of a hydro-electric power project.
We reconstructed the history of Chatthin Wildlife Sanctuary (CWS) to understand how social and economic events, and policy changes affected the sanctuary’s condition. We surveyed 25 villages surrounding CWS to evaluate past and present ecological conditions, compare the results with historical accounts and identify causal relationships. During the first half of the 20th century, the primary threat was the government’s reduction of old growth forest to supply fuel wood for the British-built railway. The railroad opened the area to colonization, but the villagers’ impact on timber and wildlife was low. From 1945 to 1988, villagers became the primary force of landscape degradation. The post-war windfall of firearms increased hunting pressure, and populations of large mammal started to decline. With the economic decline of the1970s and 1980s, the community’s demand for game and forest products intensified, and the large mammal fauna was reduced from eleven to four species. From 1988–2003, the forests surrounding the sanctuary were fragmented and degraded. The absence of large predators rendered the park safe for livestock, and the combined effects of grazing and removal of forest products seriously degraded habitat within CWS. Major threats to CWS during the past two decades have resulted from land use decisions in which government-planned economic enterprises caused encroachment by villagers. Stabilization and recovery of this sanctuary will require management compatible with human needs, including expanded buffer zones, better core area protection, community forestry projects, and probably relocation of villages within the park.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.