DETERMINANTS OF JAPANESE DIRECT INVESTMENT IN SELECTED BIMP-EAGA COUNTRIES (original) (raw)
Related papers
Determinants of Japanese direct investments in selected BIMP-EAGA countries
2007
This paper uses panel data analysis to identify how Japanese multinational corporations (MNCs) allocate their investments in the selected BIMP-EAGA countries (i.e. Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines). The paper hypothesizes that the following six elements would influence the inflow of Japanese Direct Investments (JDI) into the area: country's market size, growth rate of market size, per capita income, trade deficit, inflation rates and political condition. The main findings from the panel data analysis are that there is a significant relationship between Japanese direct investments and political condition in the recipient countries. The inflows of Japanese investment tend to decrease as the political risk increases. It means that Japanese MNCs tend to allocate more investments into the countries with better political condition.
ARE FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN INDONESIA INFLUENCED BY POLITICAL RISK? A PANEL REGRESSION APPROACH
2019
Foreign direct investment was needed to encourage a country's economic growth. Foreign direct investment did not only function as an engine of development, but also became a picture of economic openness. Theoretical developments showed that foreign direct investment was not only influenced by macroeconomic variables, but also institutional and political. By using six political risk indicators from the World Bank, this study aimed to look at the influence of political risk and macroeconomic variables on investment in Indonesia. The data used were secondary data from 2004 to 2017 and used the panel data regression model. Political risk indicator data showed that Indonesia's political indicators were getting better from year to year. While the panel data regression results showed that overall political risk did not have a significant effect, the effectiveness of bureaucracy had a significant influence on foreign direct investment in Indonesia.
Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment Inflows in Asia and the Pacific Region Ways Forward
International Review of Management and Development Studies, 2018
The study examined the nexus between FDI net inflows, GDP growth rate, degree of financial openness, gross fixed capital formation, inflation, industry value added, and corporate tax rates in Asia and the Pacific Region for the period 2002-2015. It also explored the determinants’ effect on FDI inflows before and after the financial crisis. For the three (3) panel regression models (pooled OLS, fixed effects, and random effects) using aggregate data, random effects model was preferred in explaining the relationship between FDI inflows and its determinants. There is strong evidence of a positive impact of degree of openness and GFC while a strong negative impact of corporate tax rate on FDI inflows. As the majority are low-income and middle-income countries, conducive business environment for FDI to flourish through better tax and lower inflation rates were provided. On the other hand, mixed results were generated for the impact of Global crisis where a fixed effect was preferred over random effects model. Trade openness and corporate tax rates were found to be significant predictors of FDI net inflows before the crisis. After the crisis, consumer price index and inflation showed positive and significant effects, which are deemed to provide negative implications to most countries due to high cost of investments. The results provides certain policy implications for the countries in the region where FDI inflows can be influenced by the type of incentives provided by host country and the attractiveness of the domestic businesses which have not been too vibrant for international business to consider capital investments.
Japanese Foreign Investment: An Empirical Study Using a Multi-Sectoral Econometric Model
1999
This paper focuses on the Japanese foreign direct investment (FDI) behaviors and their effects on the balance of payments. An econometric model which we built enables us to analyze these effects quantitatively. The model consists of the domestic sector and the international sector, and its equations describe Japanese overseas activities and trade between Japanese foreign affiliates and domestic firms by industry. The equations of the international sector explain the displacement and associated effects of Japanese exports and the boomerang effect due to the increased overseas production. Some simulation results tell us that an increase of Japanese FDI did not necessarily contribute to reducing the huge Japanese trade surplus in the 1980's, but suggest that the structural changes of overseas production in the 1990's may have had a great impact on the trade balance.
Optimum: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is recognized as a major force that integrates developing countries into the world economy and is expected to be a key factor in driving sustainable and balanced economic growth. Emerging Market Asia countries are the host countries that receive the highest inflows of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) compared to other emerging market countries. Even in crisis conditions, emerging market countries, especially the Asian region, are still the destination for investment because of their resilience to crisis shocks. In analyzing the determinants of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), the variables used are Market Size, Trade Openness, Interest Rates, Control of Corruption, Education Levels and Telecommunication Infrastructure. The analytical method used is the Fixed Effect Model (FEM) Data Panel. The results of the study show that market size, corruption control and telecommunications infrastructure have a positive and significant effect on foreign direct inve...
Japanese direct foreign investment and the Asian financial crisis
Geoforum, 2001
This paper examines the extent to which the Asian currency crisis of 1997±1998 impacted upon the behaviour of Japanese foreign direct investment (FDI) in the manufacturing sector. Much literature has claimed that transnational corporations (TNCs) are unlikely to be ®rmly embedded in the host countries where they operate. If this is the case, then Japanese ®rms in Asia might have exhibited a high degree of disinvestment or plant closure and transfer of operations to other countries following the onset of the ®nancial crisis. Although the events surrounding the Asian crisis and subsequent recovery are still unfolding, FDI data, surveys of Japanese ®rms, and initial reactions by Toyota Motor Corporation and Matsushita Electric Industrial were reviewed to examine this proposition. In general, the evidence suggests that Japanese TNCs have not¯ed Asia bur rather they responded in the following manner. First,¯ows of Japanese FDI into Asia overall held steady throughout ®scal year 1997±1998, although it was set to decline thereafter, at least for the short term. Second, at the level of individual corporations, there is some evidence to show that major ®rms have maintained their operations, and that they have shifted to an export-orientation so as to earn income from their Asian production in overseas currencies. Third, the survey evidence points to a long-term commitment to Asia by Japanese transnationals. Ó
U.S. and Japanese Foreign Direct Investment in East Asia: A Comparative Analysis
Policy Studies Journal, 2008
East Asia has led the world in economic growth and export expansion in recent decades. The phenomenal rate of economic growth among the so-called "four little tigers"-Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan-enabled them to achieve newly industrializing country (NIC) status in the 1980s, followed by Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Earlier studies explained the development from the government-led development paradigm, or the so-called the statist approach. Scholars also argue that foreign direct investment (FDI) played an important role in the economic development, thanks to technology transfers. Kojima and Ozawa and later Kohama, however, argue that Japanese FDI help East Asian economies while U.S. FDI do not because Japanese technology transfer practices are appropriate for East Asian countries but not the United States'. Thus, we revisit the issue of East Asian economic development and test the economic effects of FDI from the United States and Japan. Using a Barro-type growth model, we test the effects of FDI from the United States and Japan on economic growth in East Asian NICs. We find that FDI from both the United States and Japan helped economic growth in the "four little tigers," but not in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand.
Japanese Direct Investment in China and Other Asian Countries
2002
This paper examines the recent trends, characteristics and determinants of Japanese direct investment in China. To study these issues, we first use qualitative and survey data to compare Japanese direct investment in China with similar investment in other Asian countries. We found that within Asia, China is the largest recipient of Japanese direct investment, with Hong Kong and Thailand coming in second and third. 76.5% of Japanese direct investment in China is in manufacturing. Such concentration in manufacturing is typical for Japanese investment in developing Asia, but rather unusual compared with Japanese investment in other developed countries. Almost one-third of Japanese investment in China is in electrical machinery. 40% of Japanese firms invest in China for cost reasons, while 21% say that they invest in China to expand market shares in China. In 1999, Japanese affiliates in China procure 47% of their inputs from China and sold 47% of the goods locally in China. We also examine econometrically the determinant of Japanese direct investment in various regions of China and compare these locational factors for direct investment from Hong Kong, the largest foreign investor in China. We found that Hong Kong companies place a stronger emphasis on labor costs and a smaller emphasis on labor quality compared to Japanese multinationals. In addition, Japanese firms prefer Economic and Technology Development Zones (ETDZs) while Hong Kong firms are attracted to Special Economic Zones (SEZs).
On Foreign Direct Investment from the ASEAN-8 Countries: A Panel Data Estimation
2022
This paper examines how capital flight, loan interest rates, inflation, exchange rates and economic growth influence foreign direct investment in the ASEAN-8 countries. We apply fixed effect estimation to panel data for data belonging to eight countries from the period 1994 to 2018. The results show that capital flight and economic growth have a positive and significant effect on foreign direct investment. An increase in capital flight, capital retain from sources of funds which greater than the use of funds, has encouraged foreign direct investment to increase. Furthermore, increased economic growth has stimulated foreign direct investment. We find that an increase in loan interest rate (SIBOR), inflation and depreciation of the exchange rate triggers a significant decline in foreign direct investment. This finding implies that capital retention from capital flight and economic growth are the main factors that create an increase in foreign direct investment in the ASEAN-8 countries. Meanwhile, loan interest rates (SIBOR), inflation and depreciation of the exchange rate are the risk factors that investors need to consider when investing in those particular countries. This paper is useful for policy makers in the ASEAN-8 countries to consider these five variables, as the important factors that significantly influence foreign direct investment in the ASEAN-8 countries.
2020
This paper examines how the relationship between IFDI and its determinants change depending on different economic development stages in Asia following The Strategies of the Flying Geese and patterns of IFDI and the previous work by Jadhav (2012), Rashid et.al (2016) and Jaiblai and Shenai (2019). The sample consists of panel time-series data between 2000 and 2018 and comprises a total of 20 Asian countries, divided into four groups of economic development stages: emerging countries, developing countries, transition countries and LDCs. The empirical results reveal that: (i) an increase in exchange rate affects the relationship between IFDI more negative in transition countries as compared to LDCs, (ii) an increase in inflation rate affects the relationship between IFDI more positive in emerging countries as compared to developing countries, (iii) an increase in inflation rate affects the relationship between IFDI more positive in emerging countries as compared to LDCs, and (iv) there...