Single-pass Whole-body vs Organ-selective Computed Tomography for Trauma—Timely Diagnosis vs Radiation Exposure: An Observational Study (original) (raw)

Single Pass Whole-Body versus Organ-Selective Computed Tomography for Trauma: Timely diagnosis versus radiation exposure? – An observational Study

2019

Background Single Pass Whole-Body Computed Tomography (WBCT) has been used as a high yield diagnostic tool in trauma. However, increased exposure to radiation and delay in treatment, have been cited as challenges to its widespread use. We hypothesized that WBCT has at least the same radiation exposure compared to Organ-Selective CT and it does not inflict further delays in treatment. Methods We retrospectively review all trauma patients in whom CT-scans were performed on arrival at a Level I Trauma Center from January, 2016 to December, 2017. Results 123 patients were included: 53 in the OSCT group and 70 in the WBCT group. In the OSCT group, 64.1% of the patients had penetrating trauma and chest injuries were the most common injured body cavity (79.3%). In the WBCT group, 65.7% had blunt trauma and head injuries were the most common (71.9%) injured organ. The OSCT group required subsequent trips to the scanner suite for follow-up studies to rule out other potential injuries which i...

Radiation Exposure From Diagnostic Imaging in Severely Injured Trauma Patients

The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 2007

Background: Trauma patients often require multiple imaging tests, including computed tomography (CT) scans. CT scanning, however, is associated with high-radiation doses. The purpose of this study was to measure the radiation doses trauma patients receive from diagnostic imaging. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted from June 1, 2004 to March 31, 2005 at a Level I trauma center in Toronto, Canada. All trauma patients who arrived directly from the scene of injury and who survived to discharge were included. Three dosimeters were placed on each patient (neck, chest, and groin) before radio-logic examination. Dosimeters were removed before discharge. Surface doses in millisieverts (mSv) at the neck, chest, and groin were measured. Total effective dose, thyroid, breast, and red bone marrow organ doses were then calculated. Results: Trauma patients received a mean effective dose of 22.7 mSv. The standard "linear no threshold" (LNT) model used to extrapolate from effects observed at higher dose levels suggests that this would result in approximately 190 additional cancer deaths in a population of 100,000 individuals so exposed. In addition, the thyroid received a mean dose of 58.5 mSv. Therefore, 4.4 additional fatal thyroid cancers would be expected per 100,000 persons. In all, 22% of all patients had a thyroid dose of over 100 mSv (mean, 156.3 mSv), meaning 11.7 additional fatal thyroid cancers per 100,000 persons would result in this subgroup. Conclusion: Trauma patients are exposed to significant radiation doses from diagnostic imaging, resulting in a small but measurable excess cancer risk. This small individual risk may become a greater public health issue as more CT examinations are performed. Unnecessary CT scans should be avoided.

Radiological findings and radiation exposure during trauma workup in a cohort of 1124 level 1 trauma patients

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2016

Background During the initial assessment of patients with potential severe injuries, radiological examinations are performed in order to rapidly diagnose clinically relevant injuries. Previous studies have shown that performing these examinations routinely is not always necessary and that trauma patients are exposed to substantial radiation doses. The aim of this study was to assess the amount and findings of radiological examinations during the initial assessment of trauma patients and to determine the radiation doses to which these patients are exposed to. Methods We analyzed the 1124 patients included in a randomized trial. All radiological examinations during the initial assessment (i.e., primary and secondary survey) were assessed. The examination results were categorized as positive findings (i.e., (suspicion for) traumatic injury) and normal findings. The effective radiation doses for the examinations were calculated separately for each patient. Results Eight hundred and three patients were male (71 %), median age was 38 years, and 1079 patients sustained blunt trauma (96 %). During initial assessment, almost 3900 X-rays were performed, of which 25.4 % showed positive findings. FAST of the abdomen was performed in 989 patients (88 %), with positive findings in 10.6 %. Additional CT scanning of specific body regions was performed 1890 times in 813 patients (72.1 %), of which approximately 43.4 % revealed positive findings. Hemodynamically stable patients showed more normal findings on the radiographic studies than unstable patients. The mean radiation doses for the total population was 8.46 mSv (±7.7) and for polytraumatized patients (ISS ≥ 16) 14.3 mSv (±9.5). Conclusion Radiological diagnostics during initial assessment of trauma patients show a high rate of normal findings in our trauma system. The radiation doses to which trauma patients are exposed are considerable. Considering that the majority of the injured patients are hemodynamically stable, we suggest more selective use of X-ray and CT scanning.

Whole-body CT-based imaging algorithm for multiple trauma patients: radiation dose and time to diagnosis

The British journal of radiology, 2015

Objectives: To determine the number of imaging examinations, radiation dose, and the time to complete trauma-related imaging in multiple trauma patients before and after introduction of whole-body CT (WBCT) into early trauma care. Methods: 120 consecutive patients before and 120 patients after introduction of WBCT into our hospitals' trauma algorithm were compared regarding number and type of CT, radiography, focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST), additional CT examinations (defined as CT of same body regions after radiography and/or FAST), and the time to complete trauma-related imaging. Results: In the WBCT cohort significantly more patients underwent CT of the head, neck, chest, and abdomen (P<.001) as compared to the non-WBCT cohort, whereas the number of radiography of the cervical spine, chest and pelvis and of FAST examinations were significantly lower (P<.001). There were no significant differences between cohorts regarding the number of radiography ...

Radiation from CT scans in paediatric trauma patients: Indications, effective dose, and impact on surgical decisions

Injury, 2014

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the effective dose of radiation due to computed tomography (CT) scans in paediatric trauma patients at a level 1 Canadian paediatric trauma centre. We also explored the indications and actions taken as a result of these scans. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective review of paediatric trauma patients presenting to our centre from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2008. All CT scans performed during the initial trauma resuscitation, hospital stay, and 6 months afterwards were included. Effective dose was calculated using the reported dose length product for each scan and conversion factors specific for body region and age of the patient. Results: 157 paediatric trauma patients were identified during the 2-year study period. Mean Injury Severity Score was 22.5 (range 12-75). 133 patients received at least one CT scan. The mean number of scans per patient was 2.6 (range 0-16). Most scans resulted in no further action (56%) or additional imaging (32%). A decision to perform a procedure (2%), surgery (8%), or withdrawal of life support (2%) was less common. The average dose per patient was 13.5 mSv, which is 4.5 times the background radiation compared to the general population. CT head was the most commonly performed type of scan and was most likely to be repeated. CT body, defined as a scan of the chest, abdomen, and/or pelvis, was associated with the highest effective dose. Conclusions: CT is a significant source of radiation in paediatric trauma patients. Clinicians should carefully consider the indications for each scan, especially when performing non-resuscitation scans. There is a need for evidence-based treatment algorithms to assist clinicians in selecting appropriate imaging for patients with severe multisystem trauma. ß

Radiation exposure before and after the introductionof a dedicated total-body CT protocolin multitrauma patients

Emergency radiology, 2013

Total-body CT (TBCT) scanning in trauma patients is being increasingly used in trauma assessment. One of the major disadvantages of CT scanning is the amount of radiation exposure involved. The aim of this study was to assess the number of radiological investigations and their associated radiation exposure in multitrauma patients before and after the introduction of a total-body CT protocol as a primary diagnostic tool. The Trauma Registry was used to identify trauma patients admitted to our Level 1 trauma centre in 2008 (pre-TBCT protocol) and 2010 (post-TBCT protocol). Consecutive patients with an Injury Severity Score of ≥16 were included. Patients aged 16 or under, referrals from other hospitals and patients with specific low-energy injury mechanisms were excluded. Subsequent effective doses were estimated from literature and from dose calculations. Three hundred one patients were included, 150 patients pre- and 151 post-introduction of the TBCT protocol. Demographics were compa...

Radiation Organ Dose Measurement and Cancer Risk Estimation in CT Examination on Trauma Patients

Middle East Journal of Cancer, 2019

Background: This study intended to measure radiation doses to various organs and calculate the risk of cancer incidence from neck computed tomography and head computed tomography scans of trauma patients by using a thermoluminescent dosimeter. Methods:We assessed 93 patients who presented to the Emergency Department. Based on their health conditions, different computed tomography scans were performed. We used a fixed tube current of 200 mAs and tube voltage of 120 kVp for all patients. Next, we derived the effective radiation dose by multiplying the dose length product and conversion factor of each computed tomography scan based on the International Commission on Radiological Protection 103. Organ dose estimations were calculated from the dosimeter readout. We calculated the life attributable risk for cancer incidence based on the Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII preferred models. Results: Neck computed tomography scans had a mean effective dose of 2.18 ...

Evaluating the Necessity and Radiation Risk of Brain CT Scans Requested by the Trauma Emergency Department

Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2021

Background: Numerous Computed Tomography (CT) scan requests for trauma patients have raised serious concern about the impacts of radiation such as radiationinduced cancers. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the necessity rate of requested head CT scans for traumatic patients and to ultimately estimate the risk of radiation-induced brain cancer. Material and Methods: In this retrospective analytical study, traumatic patients, who had undergone a head CT scan in a two-month period from August 23 to October 22, 2018, were considered as the study population. Two radiologists reviewed each patient individually to evaluate the rate of normal and abnormal cases. Dose length product in milligrays (mGy) was utilized to calculate the effective dose (ED) in millisieverts (mSv), resulting in an assessment of the risk of radiationinduced brain cancer using ICRP 103. Results: Among 523 scans, 460 patients (88%) received normal reviews, while only 47 patients (9%) had findings related to their current trauma. The mean effective dose value was 1.05±0.36 mSv. Risk of the radiation induced brain cancer was calculated to be 0.037 and 0.030 new cancer cases in 10000 males and females per Gy, respectively. Conclusion: Final results demonstrated that a significant number of traumatic patients undergoing a CT scan are in fact, healthy. Such reckless usage of CT and consequently the excess exposure could result in a dramatic rise in cancer rates. The need to limit unnecessary CT scan usage and keeping the radiation given to patients as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) when collecting essential diagnostic data is more critical than ever.