The Role of Process Knowledge in a Business Process Improvement Methodology (original) (raw)
Related papers
Elements of knowledge management in the improvement of business processes
Management, 2016
SummaryThe key role in process management is played by the systematic analysis, measurement and improvement of processes. The imperative of continuous introduction of changes in processes is the answer to the changing conditions of competition and the great dynamics in the expectations and preferences of customers. Information related to business process should be collected and formalized in order to improve the execution of processes. In connection with the above, it may be stated that the improvement of processes should be supported by the concept of knowledge management in the institutional sense where we refer to the structure of communication and information which enables the interaction between members of the organization. The purpose of the study is to present relations between process management and the concept of knowledge management, with particular attention being paid to the improvement of processes seen through the prism of knowledge resources. The execution of the obje...
1999
In this paper we seek to elaborate on a recent understanding that successfully inducing business process change is highly dependent upon the knowledge management capabilities of an organization. From this perspective, we believe that the current methodological basis for business process management lacks transparency and, very often, fundamental justification. Most methodological support advanced in the literature is taken too often for granted, and does not seize business process change as a knowledge creation effort. As a consequence, many business process professionals fail to mobilize, exploit and capitalize on the organizational knowledge base, which is needed for inducing business process change. In this paper, we will explain some of these methodological shortcomings, and offer the SPARTA framework for developing a far more inclusive, integrative and adaptive approach to the field of business process knowledge management. The framework reflects our belief that successful business process change highly depends on a degree to which some key dimensions fit together harmoniously. Moreover, the paper will elaborate on how this concept of methodological fit can be applied at various conceptual levels. Illustrations from the Financial Services Industry will accompany our understandings.
Creating a knowledge management architecture for business process change
Proceedings of the 1999 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research - SIGCPR '99, 1999
In this paper we seek to elaborate on a recent understanding that successfully inducing business process change is highly dependent upon the knowledge management capabilities of an organization. From this perspective, we believe that the current methodological basis for business process management lacks transparency and, very often, fundamental justification. Most methodological support advanced in the literature is taken too often for granted, and does not seize business process change as a knowledge creation effort. As a consequence, many business process professionals fail to mobilize, exploit and capitalize on the organizational knowledge base, which is needed for inducing business process change. In this paper, we will explain some of these methodological shortcomings, and offer the SPARTA framework for developing a far more inclusive, integrative and adaptive approach to the field of business process knowledge management. The framework reflects our belief that successful business process change highly depends on a degree to which some key dimensions fit together harmoniously. Moreover, the paper will elaborate on how this concept of methodological fit can be applied at various conceptual levels. Illustrations from the Financial Services Industry will accompany our understandings.
Understanding Knowledge-Intensive, Practice-Oriented Business Processes
2008
In order to create new opportunities for competitive differentiation, organisations are starting to shift their focus from transactional operational Business Processes (BPs) to other types of processes that cannot be easily replicated. Their key ingredients are human knowledge, experience and creativity that cannot be standardised, prescribed and easily acquired. While Business Process Management (BPM) research and practice will remain focused on highly structured operational BPs for quite some time, there is a need to better understand other types of BPs, especially their knowledge aspect. This is expected to lead to new knowledge management strategies and processes designed to better leverage human capital to ensure continuous improvement of business processes. This paper focuses on knowledge-intensive, practice-oriented BPs. It describes an exploratory case study of a complex practice-oriented BP in a large, multi-unit organization and illustrates how our research findings expand current BPM boundaries, especially in the area of BP improvement methodologies.
Business Process Management Don't forget to improve the process
Business Process Management (BPM) is the discipline that combines knowledge from information technology, management sciences and industrial engineering, with the goal of improving business processes. The discipline builds upon earlier work on office automation, workflow management, operations research, lean manufacturing, six sigma and business process reengineering. Although the value of "process thinking" is widely acknowledged and most organizations document their processes one way or another, more sophisticated BPM techniques and technologies failed to become widely adopted. This special issue of BISE on BPM Use Cases aims to provide an overview of the BPM discipline and reflect on its development. To set the scene, we provide a short history of BPM followed by a critical analysis of the current state of the art. We will argue that the, sometimes excessive, focus on process models does not always yield better business processes. The central question addressed in this paper is "How can BPM contribute to better processes rather than better models?"
Achieving higher levels of business process improvement: A case study
2009
The research topic has significant implications on organisations that aspire to reach higher levels of improvement by continuously creating diverse values to their stakeholders and building unique Business Process Improvement (BPI) capabilities. We present an a-priori model derived from well-known theories and domains such as stakeholder and organisational capabilities theories. The model mainly posits that the degree of key stakeholder requirements alignment and the BPI organisational capabilities together impact the level of improvement achieved in BPI projects. These factors are in turn impacted by, for example, centrality, communication, culture. The model is tested using a case study in an Australian higher education institution, relying primarily on semi-structured interviews. The testing of the model has uncovered a number of interesting insights. For example, continuous top management support, which was posited to be an antecedent of BPI organisational capabilities, was found to be strongly related to key stakeholders requirements' alignment and risk management. As such, top management can play a more effective role in BPI initiatives in achieving higher levels of improvement. The case also found that better levels of: time to perform processes, accessibility, maintainability, accuracy, ease of use, consistency, quality, and end users' satisfaction could measure the levels of improvement.
Journal of Process Management. New Technologies, 2019
The aim of this paper is to highlight the importance knowledge management and business processes management has in the modern economy. The paper reflects on the impact of knowledge management on business processes and on the improvement of the management thereof, on the basis of the relevant literature. The related research shows a mutual connection between these two concepts and points to the potential benefits of their successful integration. This paper is a framework overview of all the positive effects of knowledge management on business process management in the organization, which allows for better understanding and use of knowledge for more effective business process management.
BAX Global : a case study of business process improvement theory and practice
2006
This descriptive case study outlines how Business Process Improvement (BPI) was bundled into a learning and development program to achieve targets on freight forwarding clearance while embedding BPI competencies within the organisation. Non-compliance with company standards, low productivity and flow-on blockages prompted managements' action. The Program team members included company representatives, university academics and a business process trainer, together they managed, delivered and recorded the program. Insights into managing the challenges of overcoming resistance to change and embedding innovative training methods such as GDSS, BizKit, StickyWall & Belbin Team Roles are captured. Questions of interest include; Would BPI and the tools become truly integrated? Are the techniques and experiences generalisable? Action research methodology was adopted as an aide to reflective analysis.
A Comprehensive Process Improvement Methodology
Cases on Information Technology and Business Process Reengineering
This case, coauthored by a process improvement manager, looks at business process reengineering (BPR) and discusses how it has received considerable attention from the management information systems (MIS) community. However, dramatic improvements touted by BPR advocates have failed to materialize in many organizations